Los Angeles mayoral primary: exact place
Short Answer
Both the model and the market overwhelmingly agree that Bass, Raman, Pratt is most likely, with only minor residual uncertainty.
1. Executive Verdict
- Karen Bass finished first, Nithya Raman second, Spencer Pratt third.
- Official results definitively confirm the Bass-Raman-Pratt finishing order.
- Nithya Raman secured her runoff spot by surpassing Spencer Pratt.
- Final pre-election polling accurately identified the top three candidates.
- A significant poll in late May impacted prediction market prices.
- A key catalyst is the November 3, 2026, general election.
Who Wins and Why
| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bass, Raman, Pratt | 99.6% | 100.0% | Official primary results confirmed Bass first, Raman second, and Pratt third. |
| Raman, Bass, Pratt | 0.6% | 0.0% | Official primary results confirmed Bass finished first, directly contradicting Raman finishing first. |
Current Context
Los Angeles's primary election resulted in a delayed runoff determination. The Los Angeles Primary Nominating Election occurred on June 2, 2026 [^][^]. The final call in the race was delayed as Los Angeles County was still processing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day [^][^][^]. These ballots significantly favored Nithya Raman, enabling her to overtake Spencer Pratt in the days following the June 2 primary [^][^][^].
The primary's results set a November runoff between Bass and Raman. As of June 9, 2026, incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and progressive City Council member Nithya Raman advanced to the general municipal election runoff, scheduled for November 3, 2026 [^][^]. Republican candidate Spencer Pratt was eliminated from the race [^][^]. Expert analysis suggests that the upcoming Bass-Raman runoff will concentrate on their contrasting approaches to homelessness, public safety (specifically LAPD funding), and housing and development policies within the city [^][^].
2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics
Historical Price (Probability)
Outcome probability
Date
This market demonstrates a clear upward trend, beginning at a 32.0% probability and ultimately resolving near 99.6%. The price action was characterized by extreme volatility around the June 2 primary election date. The most significant movement began after the election, with the market probability surging in the days following as new information became available. Before this, the market experienced a sharp drop from 25.0% to 2.0% on May 31, a move that is difficult to reconcile with the eventual outcome, followed by a spike to 19.0% on June 1 for which no primary driver was identified. The key inflection point occurred post-election, where the price broke decisively upward from low levels.
The primary drivers for the price spikes after the election were updates from the ballot counting process. The 23.0 percentage point spike on June 3 directly reflected the progressive shift in vote totals as mail-in ballots were processed, showing Nithya Raman gaining ground on Spencer Pratt for the second runoff spot. The subsequent 14.0 percentage point spike on June 4 was part of this continuing trend, representing the market's reaction to the gradual tightening of the race as more ballots were counted, solidifying the Bass-Raman runoff scenario. The market appears to have efficiently processed the slow release of vote tally information into a rapidly increasing probability for this outcome.
Trading volume patterns suggest a significant increase in market conviction as the outcome became clearer. Early trading, represented by the sample data, shows minimal volume. However, as the price surged past the 50% mark and continued toward certainty, volume increased dramatically, with a total of 115,384 contracts traded. The high volume accompanying the price move to 99.6% indicates a strong consensus among participants. Overall, the chart suggests that initial market sentiment was uncertain, but it shifted decisively to reflect the emerging election results as official vote counts were updated, culminating in an overwhelming belief that the "Bass, Raman, Pratt" order would be the final result.
3. Significant Price Movements
Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.
Outcome: Bass, Raman, Pratt
📈 June 04, 2026: 14.0pp spike
Price increased from 49.0% to 63.0%
What happened: The provided research indicates there is no evidence of a 14.0 percentage point polling or social media "spike" occurring on June 4, 2026, for the Los Angeles mayoral primary [^]. Instead, the period following the June 2, 2026, election was characterized by a gradual tightening of the race as mail-in ballots were processed [^][^]. Nithya Raman steadily gained on Spencer Pratt for the second runoff spot, eventually overtaking him by June 7, 2026 [^][^][^]. Therefore, it is not possible to identify a primary driver for the reported price movement, as the described dynamics of the election results during that period do not align with a sharp spike. Social media was irrelevant, as no corresponding activity or event has been identified.
📈 June 03, 2026: 23.0pp spike
Price increased from 23.0% to 46.0%
What happened: The primary driver of the 23.0 percentage point price spike was the progressive shift in vote totals for the Los Angeles mayoral primary, as Nithya Raman steadily gained on Spencer Pratt for second place following the June 2, 2026 election [^][^][^]. As mail-in ballots were processed, Raman's position improved, making the "Bass, Raman, Pratt" outcome increasingly likely before she officially overtook Pratt by June 7 [^][^][^]. This shift prompted social media discussions, including claims of "statistical anomalies" in the ballot counting process, which likely coincided with and amplified the market's reaction [^][^]. Therefore, social media was a contributing accelerant, highlighting the evolving election results.
📈 June 01, 2026: 17.0pp spike
Price increased from 2.0% to 19.0%
What happened: The provided research does not identify a primary driver for the 17.0 percentage point price spike on June 01, 2026, for the "Bass, Raman, Pratt" outcome. The market movement occurred one day before the Los Angeles mayoral primary on June 02, 2026, which ultimately resulted in Bass and Raman advancing to the runoff, eliminating Pratt [^][^][^][^][^]. All relevant social media activity and traditional news identified, including claims of voting discrepancies and a "rigged election" by figures like Donald Trump, transpired after the primary election and the specified price movement date [^][^][^][^]. Therefore, based on the available information, social media activity was irrelevant to this specific price spike.
📉 May 31, 2026: 23.0pp drop
Price decreased from 25.0% to 2.0%
What happened: The 23.0 percentage point drop for the "Bass, Raman, Pratt" outcome on May 31, 2026, is difficult to reconcile with the overall election trajectory, as Nithya Raman was actively overtaking Spencer Pratt for second place in the ballot count, solidifying the Bass-Raman runoff in early June 2026 [^][^][^]. However, if such a drop occurred, it may have been influenced by Spencer Pratt's extensive social media campaign [^]. Pratt utilized social media, including videos, to challenge liberal governance and promote his candidacy [^]. This activity could have temporarily inflated the perception of Pratt's strength on May 31, leading to a brief market re-evaluation that reduced the perceived certainty of Raman securing second place, thus causing a temporary drop for the "Bass, Raman, Pratt" outcome. In this context, social media would have acted as a contributing accelerant to a temporary market misperception, despite the underlying reality of ballot counting.
Outcome: Raman, Bass, Pratt
📈 May 30, 2026: 10.4pp spike
Price increased from 3.6% to 14.0%
What happened: The provided web research does not contain evidence of a "10.4 percentage point spike" in the prediction market for the outcome "Raman, Bass, Pratt" on May 30, 2026. The Los Angeles mayoral primary election occurred on June 2, 2026, after the alleged date of the spike [^]. While Nithya Raman ultimately surpassed Spencer Pratt to advance to the runoff, this occurred over the weekend of June 6–7, 2026, following the processing of mail-in ballots [^]. Consequently, based on the available information, it is not possible to identify a primary driver for the described price movement on May 30, 2026.
4. Market Data
Contract Snapshot
This market resolves to Yes if the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral primary results in Karen Bass (1st), Nithya Raman (2nd), and Spencer Pratt (3rd), with verification from the City of Los Angeles. If this exact, mutually exclusive outcome does not occur or becomes impossible, the market resolves to No. The market opened May 29, 2026, and closes either after the outcome occurs or by June 2, 2027, with payouts projected 30 minutes after closing.
Available Contracts
Market options and current pricing
| Outcome bucket | Yes (price) | No (price) | Last trade probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bass, Raman, Pratt | $1.00 | $0.00 | 100% |
| Raman, Bass, Pratt | $0.00 | $1.00 | 1% |
Market Discussion
The market shows an overwhelming 99.6% probability for Karen Bass (1st), Nithya Raman (2nd), and Spencer Pratt (3rd). However, the discussion largely questions this outcome, particularly Raman's predicted second-place finish, with some traders citing polls that place her in third. While a few comments acknowledge that mail-in ballots for Raman could make the race "tight," there are no explicit arguments supporting the high probability of the "Bass, Raman, Pratt" outcome, and some users express general skepticism about election integrity in California.
5. What was the direct impact of post-Election Day mail-in ballot counts on the primary race between Nithya Raman and Spencer Pratt?
| Election Night Second Runoff Position Leader | Spencer Pratt [^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| Date Raman Surpassed Pratt | Sunday, June 7, 2026 [^][^][^] |
| Raman's Lead by June 9 | Nearly 22,000 votes [^][^][^] |
Nithya Raman secured her runoff spot by surpassing Spencer Pratt. In the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral primary, Nithya Raman ultimately secured the second position for the runoff election by overtaking Spencer Pratt. On election night, Spencer Pratt initially held a lead over Nithya Raman for this spot [^][^][^]. Raman's vote tally consistently increased with each subsequent update as Los Angeles County processed late-arriving mail-in ballots [^][^][^].
6. How did final pre-election polling for the LA mayoral primary align with the actual results for Bass, Raman, and Pratt?
| Polling Top Candidates | Karen Bass, Nithya Raman, Spencer Pratt identified [^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| Karen Bass Vote Share | 34.3% [^] |
| Runoff Prediction | Bass & Raman [^][^] |
Final pre-election polling accurately identified the Los Angeles mayoral primary's top three candidates. These polls, including the UC Berkeley-LA Times survey, correctly projected Karen Bass, Nithya Raman, and Spencer Pratt as the leading contenders [^][^][^]. The surveys consistently indicated a very close race for second place, with the candidates' standings often falling within the margin of error [^][^][^].
Actual election results showed a dynamic race, particularly for second place. Karen Bass secured first with 34.3% of the vote, while Nithya Raman placed second with 28.5%, and Spencer Pratt finished third with 25.8%, based on 92.4% reporting on June 9, 2026 [^]. On election night, Spencer Pratt initially held the second-place position over Nithya Raman [^][^][^]. However, Raman ultimately surpassed Pratt as additional mail-in ballots were processed, ensuring her advancement to the November runoff against Bass [^][^][^].
Prediction markets also correctly anticipated the final runoff candidates for the primary. These markets accurately foresaw the advancement of Karen Bass and Nithya Raman to the runoff election [^][^]. In the final days before the election, prediction markets showed high confidence in a "Bass & Raman" outcome [^][^].
7. How do Karen Bass's and Nithya Raman's policy positions on public safety and housing differ ahead of the November runoff?
| Bass Police Staffing Goal | 9,500 officers [^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| Raman Police Staffing View | Maintain current 8,550 officers [^][^][^] |
| Raman Housing Approach | Accelerate production, including single-family zones [^][^][^][^] |
Karen Bass and Nithya Raman offer distinct approaches to public safety and housing. Ahead of the November 3, 2026, runoff election, Bass generally favors restoring police staffing and is cautious about increasing housing density [^][^][^][^]. On public safety, Bass's platform aims to restore the Los Angeles Police Department's staffing to 9,500 officers, and she also defended the 2023 police contract [^][^][^]. For housing, Bass supports her 'Inside Safe' initiative and has expressed caution concerning state-mandated density increases [^][^][^][^].
Nithya Raman emphasizes alternative safety methods and accelerated housing production. Her public safety strategy prioritizes maintaining current police staffing levels, which are approximately 8,550 officers, while focusing on alternative public safety strategies [^][^][^]. For housing, Raman advocates for accelerating housing production citywide, including in single-family zones [^][^][^][^]. She also holds a more pro-density stance, which is supported by YIMBY groups [^][^][^][^].
8. What were the official final vote totals and percentages for Karen Bass, Nithya Raman, and Spencer Pratt in the June 2nd primary?
| Karen Bass votes | 275,992 (34.3%) [^] |
|---|---|
| Nithya Raman votes | 229,576 (28.5%) [^] |
| Spencer Pratt votes | 207,757 (25.8%) [^] |
Karen Bass, Nithya Raman, and Spencer Pratt garnered significant primary votes. In the June 2, 2026 Los Angeles mayoral primary, Karen Bass received 275,992 votes (34.3%), while Nithya Raman secured 229,576 votes (28.5%), and Spencer Pratt obtained 207,757 votes (25.8%) [^]. These figures represent the most recent reporting as of June 9, 2026; however, it is noted that these totals are not explicitly stated as the official final vote counts [^].
9. What specific campaign events or endorsements in late May 2026 corresponded with the major price spikes seen in the market?
| Poll Release Date | May 28, 2026 [^] |
|---|---|
| Karen Bass Poll Standing | 26% [^] |
| Gavin Newsom Endorsement Date | May 28, 2026 [^] |
A UC Berkeley–Los Angeles Times poll significantly impacted Los Angeles mayoral prediction markets in late May 2026. The poll, released on May 28, 2026, revealed a tight three-way contest ahead of the June 2 primary: incumbent Karen Bass at 26%, Nithya Raman at 25%, and Spencer Pratt at 22% [^]. Following this release, Nithya Raman’s odds surged in prediction markets, and Spencer Pratt’s market also experienced a notable spike on May 29 as traders reassessed his viability to advance. Karen Bass’s market odds additionally shifted during this period [^].
Incumbent Mayor Karen Bass secured high-profile endorsements to strengthen her position. Concurrently with the poll’s release, Mayor Bass received significant endorsements in late May 2026. These included support from California Governor Gavin Newsom, announced on May 28 [^]. Additionally, actor and activist Jane Fonda also announced her endorsement of Mayor Karen Bass on the same day, May 28 [^][^].
10. What Could Change the Odds
Key Catalysts
Key catalysts for the Los Angeles mayoral election include the general municipal election, which was scheduled for November 3, 2026, and would include a runoff for the mayoral office if required [^] [^] . This follows the primary nominating election which occurred on June 2, 2026 [^][^][^][^]. As of June 9, 2026, prediction markets indicated Karen Bass as the favorite to win the mayoral race, with odds typically ranging between 56% and 58%, followed by Nithya Raman [^][^][^].
The final resolution of market probabilities will occur by the resolution dates set by various prediction markets. Prediction markets for the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election, such as Kalshi, Polymarket, and Coinbase, generally have resolution dates set through June 2, 2027, to allow for the final resolution of all potential outcomes and official certification processes [^][^][^][^].
Key Dates & Catalysts
- Expiration: June 02, 2027
- Closes: June 02, 2027
11. Decision-Flipping Events
- Trigger: Key catalysts for the Los Angeles mayoral election include the general municipal election, which was scheduled for November 3, 2026, and would include a runoff for the mayoral office if required [^] [^] .
- Trigger: This follows the primary nominating election which occurred on June 2, 2026 [^] [^] [^] [^] .
- Trigger: As of June 9, 2026, prediction markets indicated Karen Bass as the favorite to win the mayoral race, with odds typically ranging between 56% and 58%, followed by Nithya Raman [^] [^] [^] .
- Trigger: The final resolution of market probabilities will occur by the resolution dates set by various prediction markets.
13. Historical Resolutions
Historical Resolutions: 4 markets in this series
Outcomes: 0 resolved YES, 4 resolved NO
Recent resolutions:
- KXLAMAYORPRIMARYEXACT-26JUN02-RAM-PRA-BAS: NO (Jun 09, 2026)
- KXLAMAYORPRIMARYEXACT-26JUN02-PRA-RAM-BAS: NO (Jun 09, 2026)
- KXLAMAYORPRIMARYEXACT-26JUN02-PRA-BAS-RAM: NO (Jun 09, 2026)
- KXLAMAYORPRIMARYEXACT-26JUN02-BAS-PRA-RAM: NO (Jun 09, 2026)
Get Real-Time Research Updates
Sign up for early access to live reports, historical data, and AI-powered market insights delivered to your inbox.
