Dougaz vs Jubb

Expiration: May 4, 2026 Updated: April 21, 2026 Sports Tennis

Short Answer

Both the model and the market expect Paul Jubb to win, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.

1. Executive Verdict

Aziz Dougaz shows strong hold/break statistics on outdoor hard Challenger courts.
Paul Jubb recently reached an M25 tournament final, indicating good form.
Specific Challenger-level efficiency statistics for Paul Jubb are unavailable.
Dougaz's most recent tournament ended in an M25 quarter-final exit.
The market saw a significant price spike for Dougaz on April 20.

Who Wins and Why

Outcome	Market	Model	Why
Paul Jubb	57.0%	54.2%	Market higher by 2.8pp
Aziz Dougaz	44.0%	45.8%	Model higher by 1.8pp

2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

Historical Price (Probability)

Outcome probability

Date

This analysis covers the price action for the "Dougaz vs Jubb" prediction market. The market opened with a "YES" probability of 19.0%, indicating low initial confidence in this outcome. The price then experienced a significant and rapid upward movement on April 20th, spiking 24.0 percentage points to reach 43.0%. This was the most dramatic shift in the market's history. Following this spike, the price has stabilized around its current level of 43.0%. The overall trend is upward, moving from a low of 19.0% to a peak of 94.0% before settling. The total traded volume of 756,487 contracts indicates a highly active and liquid market.

The primary price spike on April 20th occurred without any specific external news provided in the context. This suggests the sharp increase in perceived probability was likely driven by live, in-match events that traders reacted to in real-time. The volume pattern supports this, as trading was initially non-existent and then surged as the price began its ascent, indicating that the move was backed by strong market participation. This high volume during the price rise suggests conviction among traders who were buying into the "YES" outcome. The subsequent drop in volume as the price stabilized around 43.0% suggests the market has reached a temporary equilibrium or point of consolidation after the initial volatile period.

From a technical perspective, the initial price of 19.0% acted as a clear support level from which the market launched its rally. The current price area around 43.0% is now acting as a new level of consolidation. The historical high of 94.0% represents a significant resistance point where sentiment peaked before reversing. Overall, market sentiment has shifted dramatically from bearish to neutral or slightly bullish on the "YES" outcome. The market initially priced this as a low-probability event but quickly reassessed, with the current price reflecting a much more uncertain or evenly matched contest than was initially anticipated.

3. Significant Price Movements

Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.

📈 April 20, 2026: 24.0pp spike

Price increased from 19.0% to 43.0%

Outcome: Aziz Dougaz

What happened: No supporting research available for this anomaly.

4. Market Data

View on Kalshi →

Contract Snapshot

The market resolves to "Yes" if Paul Jubb wins the professional tennis match against Aziz Dougaz after a ball has been played; otherwise, it resolves to "No." The market opened on April 20, 2026, at 2:21 am EDT and will close either after the outcome or by May 4, 2026, at 2:10 pm EDT, with projected payout 1 minute after closing. If the match does not start, it resolves to a fair price; if a player withdraws or forfeits after the match has started, that player's outcome is "No." Postponed or delayed matches remain open and close after rescheduling within two weeks.

Available Contracts

Market options and current pricing

Outcome bucket	Yes (price)	No (price)	Last trade probability
Paul Jubb	$0.57	$0.45	57%
Aziz Dougaz	$0.44	$0.57	44%

Market Discussion

The market discussion primarily revolves around the status of the match, with several traders noting that the game has been delayed. One user suggests the match has been delayed until 12:30 PM EST. There are no detailed arguments or consensus regarding which player is favored to win, with traders simply stating their "Yes" positions for either Paul Jubb or Aziz Dougaz without further explanation.

5. What are Aziz Dougaz and Paul Jubb's combined hold/break percentages?

Aziz Dougaz Hold Percentage	75.3% (Outdoor Hard, Challenger, 52 weeks) ^{[^]}
Aziz Dougaz Break Percentage	17.6% (Outdoor Hard, Challenger, 52 weeks) ^{[^]}
Paul Jubb Data Availability	Not available for specific conditions ^{[^]}, ^{[^]}, ^{[^]}, ^{[^]}

Aziz Dougaz shows strong service and return statistics. Over the last 52 weeks in ATP Challenger Tour main draw matches on outdoor hard courts, Aziz Dougaz maintained a 75.3% hold percentage, meaning he won approximately three-quarters of his service games. During the same period and under the same conditions, his break percentage was 17.6%, indicating the rate at which he won return games against opponents ^{[^]}.

Paul Jubb's specific data for these conditions is unavailable. The research did not yield the required hold and break percentage data for Paul Jubb under the precise conditions of outdoor hard courts in ATP Challenger Tour main draw matches over the past 52 weeks. Sources such as tennisratio.com ^{[^]}, coretennis.net ^{[^]}, tennisexplorer.com ^{[^]}, and tennistonic.com ^{[^]} do not provide the detailed metrics necessary to ascertain his service game and return game win percentages filtered by the exact tour level, surface, and timeframe requested.

Combined hold-plus-break percentage cannot be calculated. Consequently, due to the absence of the necessary hold and break percentage data for Paul Jubb, it is not possible to determine a combined hold-plus-break percentage for both players based on the information provided.

6. Can Paul Jubb's Pinnacle Sports Moneyline Movements Be Determined?

Opening Moneyline Price Paul Jubb	Not determinable from available sources ^{[^]}
Moneyline Price 1 Hour Before Match	Not determinable from available sources ^{[^]}
Price Shifts > 10 Cents (Low Volume)	Not determinable from available sources ^{[^]}

Historical Pinnacle Sports moneyline data for Paul Jubb was unavailable. The precise moneyline price movement for Paul Jubb on Pinnacle Sports, from the opening line to one hour before the match, including any price shifts greater than 10 cents on low trading volume, could not be determined from the research. The provided sources do not contain specific historical odds data for Pinnacle Sports required to answer the query ^{[^]}.

Referenced sources did not provide required historical Pinnacle odds. While various betting information providers like Polymarket ^{[^]}, Meridianbet ^{[^]}, and Flashscore ^{[^]} were examined, none offered the detailed historical Pinnacle Sports moneyline data necessary for this analysis. Furthermore, some sources that mentioned "Pinnacle" were found to refer to unrelated financial or mergers and acquisitions firms ^{[^]}. One betting-related source pertained to a different match not involving Paul Jubb, making it irrelevant to the research question ^{[^]}.

7. Can Aziz Dougaz and Paul Jubb's specific performance be determined?

Aziz Dougaz performance vs. top-50 return rating	Cannot be directly extracted or calculated ^{[^]}
Paul Jubb performance vs. top-50 serve rating	Cannot be directly extracted or calculated ^{[^]}
Filtering by opponent rating and specific match count	Not supported by available sources ^{[^]}

Specific performance data could not be extracted from research sources. The requested data for Aziz Dougaz against players with a top-50 return rating and for Paul Jubb against players with a top-50 serve rating in their last 20 hard court matches, including win percentages and sets won/lost, could not be directly extracted or calculated. This limitation arose because the available information does not support such highly specific filtering and analysis ^{[^]}.

Advanced opponent categorization was unavailable in the research sources. While general match statistics, historical performance data, and head-to-head information for Aziz Dougaz on hard courts were identified ^{[^]}, and comparable data for Paul Jubb on hard courts was also accessible ^{[^]}, these resources lack the functionality to categorize opponents by specific "top-50 return rating" or "top-50 serve rating." Furthermore, the ability to isolate and calculate metrics within a precise "last 20 hard court matches" context against such specifically rated opponents is not provided. Consequently, a direct comparison requiring advanced opponent filtering and a limited match count could not be performed using the web research results.

8. How Did Aziz Dougaz And Paul Jubb Perform Recently?

Aziz Dougaz Sets Completed	9 sets ^{[^]}
Paul Jubb Sets Completed	11 sets ^{[^]}
Travel Distance Between Tournaments	0 km (for both players) ^{[^]}

Aziz Dougaz completed nine sets in one tournament location. He competed in the M25 Hammamet tournament in Tunisia between April 6 and April 19, 2026 ^{[^]}. During this period, Dougaz played four matches, winning three and losing one in the quarter-finals. His total of nine sets was completed within this single tournament, resulting in a cumulative travel distance of 0 km between tournament locations ^{[^]}.

Paul Jubb completed eleven sets, also from a single tournament. He participated in the M25 Sharm El Sheikh event in Egypt during the same timeframe, leading up to April 20, 2026 ^{[^]}. Jubb played five matches, winning four and reaching the final where he ultimately lost. He completed a total of eleven sets. Like Dougaz, his cumulative travel distance between tournament locations was 0 km because he remained at a single tournament site ^{[^]}.

Both players completed numerous sets without any travel between events. Aziz Dougaz completed nine sets and Paul Jubb completed eleven sets in the 14 days prior to April 20, 2026. Neither player incurred any travel distance between tournament venues, as each focused on a single event during the specified period ^{[^]}.

9. Why Are No Pre-Match Reports Available for Dougaz vs Jubb?

Match Status	Scheduled for future date (April 20, 2026) ^{[^]}
Report Availability	No on-site pre-match reports available ^{[^]}
Primary Source Types	Live score and H2H results pages ^{[^]}

No on-site reports detailing pre-match activities for Dougaz vs. Jubb are currently available. There are no on-site reports from accredited tennis journalists or live bloggers detailing either player's warm-up intensity, visible physical issues, or interaction with trainers in the final hour before the "Dougaz vs Jubb" match. This absence is primarily due to the match being scheduled for a future date, specifically April 20, 2026 ^{[^]}.

The current sources do not offer the requested pre-match insights or journalistic coverage. The provided information consists mainly of live score and head-to-head (H2H) results pages from platforms such as Sofascore and Flashscore, which do not offer the specific pre-match details requested ^{[^]}. Since the match date of April 20, 2026, is in the future, journalistic reports or live blogs detailing warm-up activities or physical conditions would not exist at this time. Other available sources refer to different matches involving Aziz Dougaz or general news not related to this specific future encounter ^{[^]}.

10. What Could Change the Odds

Key Catalysts

Catalyst analysis unavailable.

Key Dates & Catalysts

Expiration: May 04, 2026
Closes: May 04, 2026

11. Decision-Flipping Events

Trigger: Catalyst analysis unavailable.

Recent resolutions:

KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR21COPROM-ROM: YES (Apr 21, 2026)
KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR21COPROM-COP: NO (Apr 21, 2026)
KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR21HERDEN-HER: YES (Apr 21, 2026)
KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR21HERDEN-DEN: NO (Apr 21, 2026)
KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR21TOPCRE-TOP: NO (Apr 21, 2026)

Get Real-Time Research Updates

Early Access →