Short Answer

Both the model and the market expect Michigan consumer sentiment to go above 65 in 2026, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.

1. Executive Verdict

  • Fed forecasts 2.0% core PCE and 3.1% federal funds rate for 2025.
  • Forecasters project stable job growth but rising unemployment for late 2025.
  • Post-election shifts cause diverse consumer sentiment changes across demographics.
  • ICE-CEC sub-indices spread reliably predicts stalls in consumer sentiment.
  • EIA projects lower energy prices for 2025, potentially easing consumer burdens.

Who Wins and Why

Outcome Market Model Why
Yes 18.0% 20.5% Sustained job growth and moderating inflation could boost consumer confidence by 2026.

2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

Historical Price (Probability)

Outcome probability
Date
Based on the chart data, this market has experienced a distinct upward trend since its inception. The perceived probability of Michigan consumer sentiment exceeding 65 in 2026 has increased from a low of 12.0% to its current price of 18.0%. This represents a significant 6-percentage-point gain. The price movement appears to have occurred relatively quickly in the market's early trading history, establishing the current trading range. No specific news or external context has been provided to explain this initial shift in trader sentiment.
The trading history shows a total volume of 3,529 contracts, indicating some level of participation. However, without volume data corresponding to specific price changes, it is difficult to determine the conviction behind any single move. From a technical perspective, the market has established initial support at its all-time low of 12.0%. The current price of 18.0% acts as the primary resistance level, as it is the highest point the market has reached to date.
Overall, the price action suggests that early market sentiment has become more optimistic about the prospect of higher consumer confidence in 2026. The initial forecast of a 12% chance has been reassessed upwards to 18%. While this is still a relatively low probability, the positive trend indicates that early participants believe the likelihood of the event occurring is greater than when the market first opened. The price consolidating at the 18.0% level will be a key indicator for future direction.

3. Market Data

View on Kalshi →

Contract Snapshot

The market resolves to Yes if any University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index final monthly release, published during calendar year 2026, reports a value above 65.0; otherwise, it resolves to No. Outcomes are verified from the University of Michigan. The market opens on April 25, 2026, and will close early if the Yes condition is met or by December 18, 2026, at 9:55 am EST, with projected payouts 30 minutes after closing.

Available Contracts

Market options and current pricing

Outcome bucket Yes (price) No (price) Last trade probability
Yes $0.18 $0.83 18%

Market Discussion

Limited public discussion available for this market.

4. How Do Fed and WSJ 2025 Economic Forecasts Compare?

Fed 2025 Core PCE Inflation2.0% (Federal Reserve March 2026 SEP [^])
Fed 2025 Federal Funds Rate3.1% (Federal Reserve March 2026 SEP [^])
WSJ 2025 Federal Funds Rate3.80% (Wall Street Journal April 2026 Survey [^])
Federal Reserve projects 2.0% core PCE, 3.1% federal funds rate for 2025. The Federal Reserve's Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) from March 2026 provides median forecasts for year-end 2025. These projections indicate that the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation rate, which excludes food and energy, is anticipated to be 2.0% [^]. Furthermore, the median forecast from the same FOMC materials sets the federal funds rate at 3.1% by the close of 2025 [^].
Wall Street Journal economists forecast higher 2025 inflation and interest rates. In contrast, the Wall Street Journal's Economic Forecasting Survey, published in April 2026, presents slightly different consensus forecasts from participating economists. For year-end 2025, the mean forecast for core PCE inflation in this survey is 2.3% [^]. Regarding the federal funds rate, the survey reports a mean forecast of 3.80% for the end of 2025 [^].

5. What are the H2 2025 Non-Farm Payroll and Unemployment Projections?

Monthly Avg NFP Gains100,000 (Survey of Professional Forecasters) [^]
U3 Unemployment Rate Avg (H2 2025)4.15% (Survey of Professional Forecasters) [^]
U3 Unemployment Rate (Q3 2025)4.1% (Survey of Professional Forecasters) [^]
Professional forecasters project stable job growth and rising unemployment for late 2025. According to the first quarter 2025 Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, the consensus anticipates monthly average Non-Farm Payroll (NFP) gains of 100,000 jobs per month for the second half of 2025 [^]. Specifically, this includes projected gains of 100,000 in both the third and fourth quarters of 2025, indicating stable job growth [^]. Concurrently, the SPF consensus projects a slight increase in the U3 unemployment rate throughout the second half of 2025, with a median forecast of 4.1% for the third quarter and 4.2% for the fourth quarter [^]. This results in an average unemployment rate of approximately 4.15% over the entire second half of the year [^].
These labor market projections are crucial for shaping future perceptions. The anticipated trends in Non-Farm Payroll gains and the U3 unemployment rate during the second half of 2025 will be key in setting the stage for labor market perceptions entering 2026 [^].

6. How Does Post-Election Consumer Sentiment Vary by Party and Income?

Partisan Sentiment ShiftWinning party supporters' sentiment surges, losing party's declines, creating a persistent gap [^]
Income Quintile SensitivityLower-income households sensitive to inflation/unemployment, higher-income to financial markets/wealth [^]
Projected Sentiment 2024-2025Overall sentiment recovery expected, but uneven across income and political groups [^]
Following a presidential election, consumer sentiment shifts dramatically and diversely across demographics. Supporters of the winning party typically experience a substantial rise in optimism regarding economic conditions and the future, while supporters of the losing party see a sharp decline in sentiment [^]. This creates a significant partisan gap, exemplified by the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers reports: after the 2016 election, Republican sentiment surged as Democratic sentiment plummeted, establishing a record partisan divide [^]. A reversed pattern occurred after the 2020 election, with Democratic sentiment improving and Republican sentiment declining [^]. Sentiment trends also differ across income quintiles; lower-income households are more acutely affected by immediate economic pressures like inflation, gas prices, and job security, leading to potentially more pronounced declines and slower recoveries. Higher-income households, conversely, are typically more influenced by broader financial market performance and wealth changes [^].
Future sentiment recovery appears uneven across income and political groups in late 2024 and 2025. While overall consumer sentiment may show signs of recovery, projections indicate this recovery will likely be uneven across different demographic groups [^]. Specifically, the highest income quintile is often projected to maintain a higher absolute sentiment level and exhibit a more robust or faster pace of recovery compared to the lowest income quintile [^]. The persistent partisan divide observed in past post-election periods is also anticipated to continue, with supporters of the newly elected or re-elected administration maintaining higher optimism than the opposition [^]. These ongoing disparities suggest the breadth of sentiment recovery will be narrow or uneven rather than broad and uniformly distributed, implying varied levels of economic security and optimism across the population [^].

7. Does ICE-CEC Spread Reliably Predict Consumer Sentiment Stalls?

Consumer Sentiment Index ComponentsIndex of Current Economic Conditions (CEC) and Index of Consumer Expectations (ICE) [^], [^], [^]
ICE-CEC Spread InterpretationWidening negative spread suggests increasing future pessimism [^]
Predictive Reliability of SpreadRequires specific historical empirical analysis for consistent prediction of recovery stalls [^], [^], [^]
The Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index comprises two key sub-indices. This index is composed of the Index of Current Economic Conditions (CEC) and the Index of Consumer Expectations (ICE) [^], [^], [^]. The CEC assesses consumers' evaluations of their current personal financial situations and buying conditions, while the ICE captures their outlook on the economy and personal finances over the short and long term [^], [^]. Both sub-indices are crucial for understanding consumer attitudes and are widely utilized in economic analysis [^], [^].
The spread between these sub-indices offers insights into economic direction. Economists frequently analyze the spread between the Index of Consumer Expectations and the Index of Current Economic Conditions to gauge future economic trends [^]. A widening negative spread, indicating declining consumer expectations relative to present conditions, typically suggests increasing pessimism about future economic prospects. Historically, the Index of Consumer Expectations is often a more volatile and somewhat leading indicator compared to current conditions, which is observable from charts [^]. However, whether a widening negative spread reliably precedes a stall in the headline Consumer Sentiment Index's recovery 6-9 months later during post-recessionary periods has not been explicitly confirmed as a definitive finding in the provided sources [^], [^], [^]. While such divergence is generally seen as a cautionary signal, the consistency and statistical significance of this specific predictive relationship across multiple post-recessionary cycles require further detailed empirical analysis of historical time series data [^], [^], [^].

8. How Do Projected 2025 Energy Prices Compare to Past Low Sentiment?

Projected 2025 Regular Gasoline Price$3.41 per gallon [^]
Projected 2025 Henry Hub Natural Gas Price$3.07 per million British thermal units ($/MMBtu) [^]
Average Regular Gasoline Price (2022)$3.95/gallon [^]
The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects lower energy prices for 2025, potentially easing consumer burdens. The EIA forecasts average prices for regular gasoline at $3.41 per gallon and Henry Hub natural gas at $3.07 per million British thermal units ($/MMBtu) in 2025 [^]. These projections indicate more favorable energy cost conditions compared to recent years, particularly during periods when Michigan consumer sentiment was sustained at low levels.
Michigan consumer sentiment was historically low during a period of high energy prices. The University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index remained below 65 from December 2021 through October 2023, a timeframe characterized by elevated inflation and economic uncertainty [^]. During 2022, within this period of diminished sentiment, average regular gasoline prices were approximately $3.95 per gallon, and Henry Hub natural gas averaged $6.45/MMBtu [^]. The EIA's 2025 forecasts for gasoline ($3.41/gallon) and Henry Hub natural gas ($3.07/MMBtu) are considerably lower than these figures from the period of low consumer sentiment [^].
Natural gas prices in 2025 will rise from a 2024 record low. The EIA anticipates that U.S. natural gas spot prices in 2025 will increase from a record low observed in 2024 [^]. Despite this increase, these prices are expected to remain below the elevated levels experienced during the recent period of sustained low consumer sentiment [^].

9. What Could Change the Odds

Key Catalysts

Catalyst analysis unavailable.

Key Dates & Catalysts

  • Expiration: December 25, 2026
  • Closes: December 18, 2026

10. Decision-Flipping Events

  • Trigger: Catalyst analysis unavailable.

12. Historical Resolutions

No historical resolution data available for this series.