Short Answer

The model sees potential mispricing: the United Party for National Development is favored to win the next Zambian National Assembly election at 88.6% model probability versus 63.0% market probability. This suggests the market may be undervaluing its chances.

1. Executive Verdict

  • New constituencies announced, projected to create a UPND structural seat bonus.
  • Surveys report strong negative economic sentiment, a risk for incumbent UPND.
  • The Patriotic Front is crippled by persistent, severe internal leadership disputes.
  • PF's campaign narrative aligns with reported widespread negative economic sentiment.
  • Fragmented opposition may find opportunity amidst ruling and main party issues.

Who Wins and Why

Outcome Market Model Why
Patriotic Front 9.9% 11.4% The Patriotic Front is not expected to win the next Zambian National Assembly election.
United Party for National Development 63.0% 88.6% The United Party for National Development is widely expected to win the next election.

Current Context

Zambia's 2026 general elections are underway with significant electoral preparations. The next general elections in Zambia are scheduled for August 13, 2026, for the purpose of electing a president, members of the National Assembly, and local government officials [^]. The Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) has begun preparations for these polls, including a delimitation exercise that will create 70 new constituencies, bringing the total number of National Assembly seats to be contested to 280 [^][^].
The political landscape in Zambia is currently dynamic, featuring shifting alliances. As of May 2026, the political environment is highly fluid, characterized by evolving alliances and ongoing legal challenges involving various political parties [^][^][^]. Recent developments include the validation of new opposition presidential candidates and the withdrawal of others, often amidst existing legal disputes [^][^][^].
Expert consensus on the election winner remains elusive amid active campaigning. There is no definitive expert agreement regarding the likely winner of the upcoming election, as perspectives diverge significantly between supporters of the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) and various opposition factions [^][^][^]. Both sides are actively campaigning, focusing on key issues such as the cost of living and political representation [^][^][^].

2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

Historical Price (Probability)

Outcome probability
Date
This prediction market has seen a consistent downward trend, with the probability of a "YES" outcome declining from a starting point of 69.0% to its current price of 63.0%. The most significant movement was a sharp 6-point drop early in the market's history. This re-pricing appears to coincide with reports on preparations for the 2026 election, which include a major electoral change involving the creation of 70 new constituencies. This development, along with a political landscape described as highly fluid with evolving alliances, may have introduced significant uncertainty, causing participants to revise their expectations downward for the "YES" side.
The market is characterized by very low trading volume, with only 36 contracts traded in total. The significant price drop occurred on a volume of just 6 contracts, which suggests that the shift in sentiment may not be driven by strong market conviction. Since the drop, the price has established a clear support level at 63.0%, holding steady at this price for the remainder of the observed period. This stability suggests a temporary consensus has been reached, but the low overall participation indicates that market sentiment remains tentative and could be subject to further changes as more information becomes available.

3. Market Data

View on Kalshi →

Contract Snapshot

This market resolves to "Yes" if the United Party for National Development wins the next Zambian National Assembly election, expected by 2026, and "No" otherwise. The market opened on July 16, 2025, and will close upon the outcome, or by August 13, 2027, at the latest, with payouts projected 30 minutes after closing. Resolution is based on official certification by the Electoral Commission of Zambia; if the election is postponed, the contract remains open for up to two additional years, and contested results are determined by the final certified outcome from the relevant authority.

Available Contracts

Market options and current pricing

Outcome bucket Yes (price) No (price) Last trade probability
United Party for National Development $0.71 $0.37 63%
Patriotic Front $0.11 $0.90 10%

Market Discussion

The incumbent United Party for National Development (UPND), led by President Hakainde Hichilema, is widely anticipated to win the next Zambian National Assembly election, primarily due to President Hichilema's strong popularity and the party's perceived organizational strength and development achievements [^][^][^][^]. The opposition is largely viewed as fragmented and lacking national presence, despite efforts to form alliances such as the Tonse Alliance [^][^][^]. While there are concerns about electoral fairness and system changes, a majority of survey respondents expressed confidence in the overall fairness of the 2026 elections [^][^][^].

4. How do the electoral strategies of the United Party for National Development (UPND) and the Patriotic Front (PF) compare for capturing the 70 new constituencies created by the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ)?

President Hichilema's Poll Standing60% (against 35% for combined opposition) [^][^]
Undecided Voters32% [^][^]
Number of New Constituencies70 [^][^][^]
The United Party for National Development (UPND) is strategizing to capitalize on structural advantages and economic achievements within the 70 newly established constituencies. The party aims to consolidate its base in regions where most of these new areas are located, leveraging the increased Constituency Development Fund (CDF) to visibly demonstrate its impact at the grassroots level [^][^][^]. The UPND also plans a centralized approach for candidate adoption, employing internal consultations to strategically position new candidates [^]. This strategy may also involve encouraging smaller or youth-led parties to run independently, with the intention of absorbing their proportional representation votes and aligning after the election [^]. Furthermore, the UPND intends to emphasize its economic accomplishments, such as debt restructuring and reduced inflation, to appeal to voters in both urban and rural areas [^][^].
Conversely, the Patriotic Front (PF) is focusing its strategy on discrediting the UPND's governance and energizing its own supporters. The PF campaign accuses the current administration of "five years of lies, mismanagement of the economy, rampant corruption, broken promises, and abuse of human rights" [^][^][^]. This narrative is designed to delegitimize any potential gains made by the UPND in the new constituencies [^][^][^]. The PF also plans intensive ground mobilization efforts in both new and existing constituencies to ensure high voter turnout, recognizing that party unity is a critical factor for successfully contesting these electoral areas [^][^][^][^][^].
Despite the PF's counter-campaign, UPND currently holds a lead in public opinion polls. Incumbent President Hichilema and the UPND are ahead, with Hichilema securing 60% support compared to 35% for the combined opposition in a recent survey [^][^]. However, a significant portion of the electorate, specifically 32%, remains undecided or unwilling to disclose their voting intentions. This indicates a potential for shifts in voter sentiment as the election approaches [^][^].

5. What impact could the final resolution of the Patriotic Front's internal leadership disputes have on its electoral competitiveness against the UPND in the 2026 election?

PF Internal StateCrippled by severe internal leadership disputes (1)(2)(3)(4) [^]
PF Electoral RiskPotential for political irrelevance before 2026 elections (1)(2) [^]
UPND ChallengesFaces significant headwinds jeopardizing re-election bid (5)(6) [^]
Persistent internal disputes severely hinder the Patriotic Front's electoral viability [^] . - The Editor Zambia">[^]. The Patriotic Front (PF) is significantly hampered by persistent internal leadership disputes, which have led to legal paralysis and cast doubt on its ability to effectively field candidates or maintain its legal standing for the 2026 general election (1)(2)(3)(4) [^]. This intense factional infighting has prompted some observers to suggest a potential electoral collapse for the party, raising concerns that it may become politically irrelevant before the 2026 elections (1)(2)(3)(4) [^]. The available research, however, does not explicitly detail the specific impact a final resolution of these disputes would have on the PF's electoral competitiveness against the United Party for National Development (UPND) (1)(2)(3)(4) [^]. The incumbent UPND faces challenges despite opposition fragmentation [^]. Despite the struggles within the Patriotic Front, the incumbent United Party for National Development (UPND) confronts significant challenges, including economic hardship, rising costs of living, and accusations of democratic backsliding, which critics argue could jeopardize its re-election bid in 2026 (5)(6) [^]. To counter the governing UPND, the PF has joined the Tonse Alliance, which has designated Brian Mundubile as its presidential candidate for the 2026 election (6) [^]. Nevertheless, the opposition bloc generally remains fragmented compared to the incumbent's consolidated position (6) [^].

6. What do recent by-election results and economic sentiment data from 2024-2025 indicate about the UPND's incumbency advantage leading into the 2026 campaign?

UPND Ntanda Ward by-election votes (2025)445 (vs 64 for Socialist Party) [^][^]
UPND Mang’unza Ward by-election votes (2025)887 (vs 64 for runner-up) [^][^]
Zambians believing country is heading in wrong direction (2024-2025)66% (increased 20 points from 2022) [^]
UPND shows strong local incumbency advantage in by-elections. Recent by-election results from 2025 indicate robust local performance for the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) as the 2026 general election approaches. The party secured significant victories, including 445 votes in Ntanda Ward (Mpongwe) compared to 64 for the Socialist Party, and 887 votes in Mang’unza Ward (Choma) against 64 for the runner-up. These wins are interpreted as a clear indication of the party's strength at the local level [^][^].
Negative economic sentiment contrasts with local election successes. This local political success, however, is set against a backdrop of strongly negative economic sentiment reported across Zambia during 2024-2025. Afrobarometer data reveals that a substantial 66% of Zambians believe the country is heading in the wrong direction, representing a 20-point increase since 2022. Furthermore, 73% describe the current economic condition as “fairly bad” or “very bad,” with only 36% of the population anticipating economic improvement in the coming year [^].
Economic woes create significant political risk for the incumbent. The challenging economic environment, characterized by persistent inflation exceeding 15% for several months and a severe 2024 drought that destroyed 70% of the harvest, is directly linked to increased political risk for the incumbent government. Experts suggest that the upcoming 2026 election could function as a referendum on the administration's performance, potentially diminishing the 'change' dividend the ruling party previously enjoyed amid growing cost-of-living pressures [^][^].

7. Which reputable polling organizations are conducting national voter intention surveys for Zambia's 2026 election, and what is their historical accuracy?

Next General ElectionAugust 13, 2026 [^]
Active Research Organization (2026)Zambia Election Research Network (ZERN) [^]
Historical Polling Accuracy DataLimited systematic data available [^]
Zambia's 2026 elections prompt ongoing voter intention research. The next general elections, which will include the election of both the President and members of the National Assembly, are scheduled for August 13, 2026 [^]. In preparation for these elections, the Zambia Election Research Network (ZERN) is noted for actively conducting research on public perceptions and voter intentions [^].
Limited data exists on reputable commercial polls in Zambia. Despite ZERN's ongoing work, there is a recognized limitation in systematically available data regarding the historical accuracy of publicly released polling information in Zambia [^]. While organizations like the Zambian Election Panel Survey (ZEPS) were significant for studying the 2021 election, ZEPS is primarily an academic research project rather than a commercial polling entity [^]. The research indicates a lack of specific information on other reputable commercial polling organizations conducting national voter intention surveys for the 2026 election, as well as an absence of comprehensive historical accuracy data for polling within the country [^].

8. How might key legislative actions or economic policy decisions by the UPND government in late 2025 and early 2026 serve as catalysts affecting voter sentiment before the election?

National Assembly Seat ChangeIncreased from 167 to 280 seats [^][^]
New Proportional Representation Seats40 for women, youth, and persons with disabilities [^][^]
Next Election DateAugust 13, 2026 [^][^][^][^]
Economic policies and legislative actions significantly influence voter sentiment. The UPND government's economic policies and actions in late 2025 and early 2026 are crucial in shaping voter perception. While the government emphasizes improved GDP growth and successful debt restructuring under an IMF program, critics argue that these policies have caused substantial hardship for citizens [^][^][^][^]. This has led to widespread discontent among voters, marked by rising costs of living, persistent inflation, and inconsistent electricity supply [^][^][^][^]. Furthermore, there are allegations that the government is intentionally delaying more severe structural reforms until after the August 2026 election, a factor that could further impact public perception [^][^][^][^].
A constitutional amendment has reshaped the political landscape. A major legislative action in late 2025 involved a constitutional amendment that increased the National Assembly from 167 to 280 seats and introduced 40 proportional representation seats specifically for women, youth, and persons with disabilities [^][^]. This development takes place amidst growing political tensions, documented increases in electoral code violations, a decline in voter education initiatives, and general concerns regarding the integrity of the electoral process leading up to the August 13, 2026, polls [^][^][^][^]. Surveys suggest that President Hichilema may be vulnerable due to public discontent, even in the absence of a unified opposition challenger [^][^][^][^].

9. What Could Change the Odds

Key Catalysts

The Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) announced 70 new constituencies on 2026-04-16, anchored on the constitutional amendment that increased constituency-based seats from 156 to 226, for the August 2026 general election cycle [^] . The ECZ also stated the delimitation exercise kicked off in February 2026 with consultations in 116 districts, with names and boundaries to be published in the Government Gazette by 2026-04-15 and taking effect after the next dissolution of Parliament [^].
At least one public analysis links Zambia’s 2026 constituency delimitation to a projected UPND advantage of ~133 out of 226 constituency seats (~58.8%) under past voting patterns [^] . A second analysis claims the delimitation generates a UPND “structural seat bonus,” citing ~155–165 of 226 at ~50% popular vote, and discusses how proportional representation or nominated seats could shift the final composition [^].

Key Dates & Catalysts

  • Expiration: August 13, 2027
  • Closes: August 13, 2027

10. Decision-Flipping Events

  • Trigger: The Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) announced 70 new constituencies on 2026-04-16, anchored on the constitutional amendment that increased constituency-based seats from 156 to 226, for the August 2026 general election cycle [^] .
  • Trigger: The ECZ also stated the delimitation exercise kicked off in February 2026 with consultations in 116 districts, with names and boundaries to be published in the Government Gazette by 2026-04-15 and taking effect after the next dissolution of Parliament [^] .
  • Trigger: At least one public analysis links Zambia’s 2026 constituency delimitation to a projected UPND advantage of ~133 out of 226 constituency seats (~58.8%) under past voting patterns [^] .
  • Trigger: A second analysis claims the delimitation generates a UPND “structural seat bonus,” citing ~155–165 of 226 at ~50% popular vote, and discusses how proportional representation or nominated seats could shift the final composition [^] .

12. Historical Resolutions

No historical resolution data available for this series.