Dalla Valle vs Chazal
Short Answer
Both the model and the market expect Maxime Chazal to win, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.
1. Executive Verdict
- Dalla Valle exhibits strong clay court service and return game win percentages.
- Dalla Valle has recent match play, suggesting good match fitness.
- Specific clay court performance data for Maxime Chazal is critically absent.
- Maxime Chazal's lack of recent match play implies a lack of rhythm.
- Dalla Valle's game win percentage recently dipped; he lost his last match.
Who Wins and Why
| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maxime Chazal | 86.0% | 82.7% | Dalla Valle's recent performance dipped, including a straight-sets loss, potentially favoring Chazal. |
| Enrico Dalla Valle | 15.0% | 17.3% | Enrico Dalla Valle has strong clay court service and return game win percentages and recent match play. |
2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics
Historical Price (Probability)
Outcome probability
Date
This prediction market opened with a strong consensus favoring a "YES" outcome, with the price for Dalla Valle to win holding steady at approximately 67.0% for several days. This initial stability suggests a period of low activity and agreement among early traders. However, the market experienced a single, dramatic price movement on April 2, 2026, when the probability dropped 19 percentage points from 66.0% to 47.0%. This sharp decline established a clear downward trend and represents the most significant event in the market's history, bringing the price to its current and lowest level.
The catalyst for this significant price drop appears to be the resolution of the underlying event, the tennis match on March 31. The sudden influx of trading volume, jumping from zero to over 99,000 contracts on the day of the price collapse, indicates that the move was driven by high conviction as traders reacted to new, decisive information, likely the match result. This shift from a two-thirds probability of a Dalla Valle win to less than 50% reflects a complete reversal in market sentiment. The market's initial optimism was swiftly replaced by a strong belief that the "YES" proposition would not resolve successfully.
From a technical perspective, the price action established clear levels of interest. The 67.0% to 69.0% range acted as initial resistance, a level the market could not surpass. The subsequent drop created a new floor at 47.0%, which now serves as the primary support level. The chart essentially shows a market that was stable at one distinct price level before a high-volume event triggered a rapid repricing to a new, lower level, indicating a definitive change in the perceived outcome.
3. Significant Price Movements
Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.
📈 April 02, 2026: 22.0pp spike
Price increased from 34.0% to 56.0%
Outcome: Maxime Chazal
What happened: No supporting research available for this anomaly.
4. Market Data
Contract Snapshot
This market resolves to "Yes" if Maxime Chazal wins the Dalla Valle vs Chazal professional tennis match in the 2026 ATP Challenger Barletta Round Of 32, provided a ball has been played; otherwise, it resolves to "No". If the match is cancelled before a ball is played due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other reasons, the market will resolve to a fair price. If postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match, provided it occurs within two weeks.
The market opened on March 30, 2026, and will close after the outcome occurs, or by April 14, 2026, at 6:10 am EDT, with projected payout one minute after closing.
Available Contracts
Market options and current pricing
| Outcome bucket | Yes (price) | No (price) | Last trade probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maxime Chazal | $0.86 | $0.15 | 86% |
| Enrico Dalla Valle | $0.16 | $0.85 | 15% |
Market Discussion
Traders overwhelmingly anticipate Maxime Chazal will win, with the market showing an 84% chance for him to take the match. Supporters like "nosedive," "tomytaja," and "databait750" posted short exclamations affirming Chazal's victory, which aligns with the live score showing Chazal ahead. While one user, "SilkyDavid," briefly suggested Dalla Valle would win, this was an outlier against the prevailing sentiment and the live game progress.
5. What are Enrico Dalla Valle's clay court win percentages?
| Dalla Valle 52-week combined win % | 100.5% [^] |
|---|---|
| Dalla Valle last 3 tournaments combined win % | 97.0% [^] |
| Maxime Chazal clay court win percentages | Not available [^] |
Enrico Dalla Valle's clay court performance shows strong service game statistics. Over the past 52 weeks on clay, he has maintained a service games won percentage of approximately 67.5% and a return games won percentage of about 33.0%. This results in a combined service and return game win percentage of 100.5% [^].
Dalla Valle's recent tournament performance on clay slightly decreased. In his last three tournaments on clay courts, his service games won percentage was approximately 65.0%, and his return games won percentage stood at about 32.0%. These figures combine for a total win percentage of 97.0% across these recent events [^].
A direct comparison with Maxime Chazal's data is unavailable. The detailed statistics for Maxime Chazal's service and return game win percentages for both the past 52 weeks and his last three tournaments on clay are not provided within the research [^]. Consequently, a comprehensive differential calculation between the two players cannot be performed due to the absence of comparable data for Chazal.
6. Are Pinnacle Sports Dalla Valle vs Chazal Odds Available?
| Opening Moneyline Odds | Not available for Dalla Valle vs Chazal match [^] |
|---|---|
| Implied Probability Shifts | Cannot be performed due to lack of data [^] |
| Sharp Money Influence | Cannot be determined or assessed without odds data [^] |
Specific Pinnacle Sports odds for Dalla Valle vs Chazal are unavailable from the provided web research. The opening moneyline odds from Pinnacle Sports for the Dalla Valle vs Chazal tennis match, including any subsequent movements, could not be retrieved [^]. This lack of specific data from a key bookmaker prevents a detailed examination of the initial market sentiment for this match.
Implied probability shifts cannot be accurately determined due to this data gap. Without both the initial opening odds and current odds from Pinnacle Sports, a quantitative assessment of how the implied probability for each player has shifted since the line was released is not possible [^].
Assessing 'sharp money' influence is also impossible without comprehensive odds data. This concept relies on detecting notable odds shifts caused by large professional wagers, which necessitates access to complete historical odds movement that is currently unavailable [^].
7. What Are Break Point Conversion Rates for Dalla Valle and Chazal?
| Enrico Dalla Valle Break Point Conversion Rate | 35.7% (5/14) in 5 clay matches [^] |
|---|---|
| Dalla Valle Deciding Set Break Point Data | Not available (no deciding sets in recent matches) [^] |
| Maxime Chazal Break Point Save Rate Data | Not available in provided sources [^] |
Enrico Dalla Valle converted approximately 35.7% of break points on clay. In his most recent five clay matches, Enrico Dalla Valle successfully converted 5 out of 14 break point opportunities [^]. His conversion efficiency varied considerably across these matches, recording 0% (0/1) against both Vit Kopriva and Luca Nardi, 25% (1/4) against V. Sachko and S. Travaglia, and a higher 60% (3/5) against M. Neuchrist [^]. Specific data regarding his break point conversion in deciding sets is not available, as none of these five matches reached a deciding set [^].
Maxime Chazal's break point save rates are currently unavailable. Detailed statistics concerning Maxime Chazal's break point save rate in his recent five clay matches are not present in the provided sources [^]. While one source, Tennis Explorer, lists his match results and indicates two matches that included deciding sets (losses to A. Barroso Campos and D. Michalski), it does not offer granular data such as break points saved or faced [^]. Consequently, a direct numerical comparison between Enrico Dalla Valle's break point conversion rate and Maxime Chazal's break point save rate, especially concerning performance in deciding sets, cannot be performed with the current information [^].
8. How Do Enrico Dalla Valle's and Maxime Chazal's Recent Workloads Compare?
| Enrico Dalla Valle Matches Played | 3 matches [^] |
|---|---|
| Enrico Dalla Valle Sets Played | 6 sets [^] |
| Maxime Chazal Matches/Sets Played | 0 recorded matches and sets (according to provided sources) [^] |
Enrico Dalla Valle played six sets across three matches recently. He participated in the Barletta Challenger tournament in Italy, competing in three matches between approximately March 25 and March 27, 2026. Dalla Valle secured victories in two qualifying matches, defeating Vincent Ruggeri (6-3, 6-3) and Picchione (6-4, 6-4) [^]. He then advanced to the main draw, where he lost in the Round of 32 to Lorenzo Giustino with a score of 3-6, 1-6 on March 27 [^]. All three of his matches concluded in straight sets, totaling six sets played, and all were held in Barletta, Italy [^].
Maxime Chazal has no recorded matches, indicating a rest advantage. Available web research does not list any tournament matches for Chazal within the 21 days leading up to March 31, meaning he played zero sets during this period. Enrico Dalla Valle's workload of six sets over three matches is considered moderate, and he would have had at least three full days of rest between March 28 and March 30 before a potential match on March 31. This suggests Dalla Valle would not carry significant match-play fatigue. Conversely, Chazal, with no recent play, would have a distinct rest advantage. Dalla Valle's consistent presence in Barletta implies he is well-acclimatized for any local matches, whereas Chazal's acclimatization cannot be determined without information regarding his recent travel or location. Therefore, there is no strong evidence of a significant fatigue or acclimatization disadvantage for either player, beyond Chazal's inherent rest advantage.
9. Are Enrico Dalla Valle and Maxime Chazal Facing Injury or Equipment Issues?
| Enrico Dalla Valle Status | No new injury, illness, or equipment issue reported in 72 hours (OddsDigger [^], Tennis Insight [^], Wikipedia [^]) |
|---|---|
| Maxime Chazal Status | No new injury, illness, or equipment issue reported in 72 hours (Tennis Tonic [^], Wikipedia [^], ProTipster [^]) |
| Primary Source Focus | Match predictions, head-to-head statistics, and general player information (OddsDigger [^], Tennis Insight [^], Tennis Tonic [^]) |
No verifiable information indicates recent player injury or equipment issues. Within the last 72 hours, there is no evidence of a new or aggravated injury, illness, or equipment problem for either Enrico Dalla Valle or Maxime Chazal. The research primarily comprised betting odds, match previews, and player biographical data, none of which explicitly detail such concerns for an upcoming match. These types of sources typically do not report specific, real-time issues unless an official withdrawal or obvious incident has occurred.
Reviewed sources primarily focus on predictions, general stats, and historical data. Betting odds from OddsDigger [^] and ProTipster [^], alongside match previews from Tennis Insight [^] and Tennis Tonic [^], concentrated on match predictions, head-to-head statistics, and general player overviews. Wikipedia pages for Enrico Dalla Valle [^] and Maxime Chazal [^] offered career details and general statistics. Furthermore, one provided source, an NBA injury report [^], was irrelevant to these tennis players, and another referred to the 2025 Barletta Challenger [^], which is not current. Consequently, without specific reports from official tournament channels, player statements, or sports news outlets detailing such issues within the given timeframe, the available research does not indicate any current injury, illness, or equipment problems for either player.
10. What Could Change the Odds
Key Catalysts
Catalyst analysis unavailable.
Key Dates & Catalysts
- Expiration: April 14, 2026
- Closes: April 14, 2026
11. Decision-Flipping Events
- Trigger: Catalyst analysis unavailable.
13. Historical Resolutions
Historical Resolutions: 20 markets in this series
Outcomes: 10 resolved YES, 10 resolved NO
Recent resolutions:
- KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR02ANDPAU-PAU: YES (Apr 02, 2026)
- KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR02ANDPAU-AND: NO (Apr 02, 2026)
- KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR02DEMFOR-FOR: YES (Apr 02, 2026)
- KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR02DEMFOR-DEM: NO (Apr 02, 2026)
- KXATPCHALLENGERMATCH-26APR02ELLJON-JON: NO (Apr 02, 2026)
Get Real-Time Research Updates
Sign up for early access to live reports, historical data, and AI-powered market insights delivered to your inbox.
