Short Answer

Both the model and the market expect the United States to be the next country to send humans to the Moon before 2031, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.

1. Executive Verdict

  • SpaceX orbital propellant transfer demonstrations are yet to occur.
  • China's Long March 10 rocket completed full-stack ground tests successfully.
  • Final appropriations for NASA's HLS in FY2025/2026 remain unavailable.
  • NASA AxEMU spacesuit critical design review findings are not public.
  • The US targets its initial crewed lunar landing with Artemis IV by 2028.
  • China has set a goal for a crewed lunar landing by 2030.

Who Wins and Why

Outcome Market Model Why
United States 69.0% 65.2% The US Artemis program, backed by significant investment, aims to return astronauts to the Moon.
China 31.7% 31.1% China's rapidly advancing space program has publicly stated its intention for a crewed lunar landing.
Russia 3.0% 0.9% Russia faces significant funding and technological challenges for an independent crewed lunar mission.
India 4.0% 1.1% India's space program is growing but a crewed lunar landing is a significant long-term endeavor.
European Space Agency 4.0% 1.8% ESA primarily contributes to international crewed missions and lacks an independent lunar human launch capacity.

Current Context

The United States is favored to return humans to the Moon first. Predictions indicate that the U.S. will be the next nation to send astronauts to the lunar surface before 2031 [^]. This mission is expected to occur through NASA's Artemis IV, which is currently targeted for early 2028 [^].
China targets 2030 for its lunar mission, but faces challenges. While China aims to send humans to the Moon by 2030 as part of its lunar exploration program [^], it presently trails the United States in both projected timelines and in various prediction markets [^].

2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

Historical Price (Probability)

Outcome probability
Date
This prediction market exhibits a prolonged period of consolidation, with price action moving sideways within an extremely narrow two-percentage-point range. Over nearly 300 data points, the probability has consistently traded between a support level of 68% and a resistance level of 70%. The market is currently priced at 69%, the midpoint of this channel, indicating a stable equilibrium. There have been no significant price spikes or drops to analyze, as the market has absorbed the current news landscape without major reactions. The provided context, which favors the United States' Artemis program (targeting 2028) over China's efforts (targeting 2030), appears to be fully priced in, leading to this lack of volatility.
The total trading volume of 1,786 contracts across the market's history is modest, suggesting that while a consensus has been reached, conviction may not be particularly strong, or new information has been scarce, leading to limited trading activity. The price stability indicates that traders see the current timelines as credible and are not factoring in significant probabilities of unexpected delays for the US or surprise accelerations for other nations. The market sentiment is one of steady confidence in the United States being the next country to land humans on the Moon before 2031.
Overall, the chart reflects a market awaiting a significant catalyst. The tight 68% to 70% range suggests traders believe the outcome is fairly certain based on current information, assigning roughly a 2-in-3 chance of a US success. A breakout from this established range would likely require a major official announcement, such as a significant schedule change for either the US or Chinese lunar programs, or the emergence of a credible new competitor. Until then, the price is expected to continue reflecting the established status quo.

3. Market Data

View on Kalshi →

Contract Snapshot

This market resolves to "Yes" if the United States, including missions by US-based companies like SpaceX, is the first country to launch a manned mission to the Moon before January 1, 2031. Otherwise, it resolves to "No", with the outcome verified by The New York Times. The market opened on November 28, 2024, and will close either upon the outcome occurring or by January 1, 2031, at 10:00 AM EST.

Available Contracts

Market options and current pricing

Outcome bucket Yes (price) No (price) Last trade probability
United States $0.69 $0.31 69%
China $0.32 $0.69 32%
European Space Agency $0.04 $0.97 4%
India $0.04 $0.97 4%
Russia $0.05 $0.97 3%

Market Discussion

The market indicates a strong belief that the United States (69%) will be the next country to send humans to the Moon, ahead of China (31.7%), by January 1, 2031. However, the main point of discussion among traders is the perceived vagueness of the market rules, specifically questioning whether a "manned mission to the Moon" requires a landing or if merely orbiting would qualify. Participants express concerns about how Kalshi might interpret these rules, including potential joint missions or missions by US-based private companies, leading to hesitancy among some traders.

4. What is the Current Status of Orbital Propellant Transfer Efficiency?

Orbital Propellant Transfer Demonstrated?No [^]
Starship Orbital Refueling Test Series StatusNot occurred as of March 26, 2026 [^]
Artemis III HLS Propellant Requirement1000-1200 metric tons [^]
As of March 26, 2026, SpaceX's orbital propellant transfer demonstrations have not yet occurred. Ship-to-ship orbital propellant transfer efficiency remains undemonstrated, as the planned 2025-2026 test series for Starship orbital refueling, with a 'not earlier than' date of 2026, has not taken place [^]. While progress continues on in-space refueling technologies, the actual orbital ship-to-ship transfer itself has not yet been performed [^].
The uncrewed Artemis III Human Landing System (HLS) demonstration mission demands substantial propellant in Low Earth Orbit. This mission requires approximately 1000 to 1200 metric tons of propellant to be delivered [^]. Such a substantial amount necessitates multiple tanker flights, with estimates for mission success ranging from 4 to 20 flights, including projections of 10-14 flights and 16 flights for a single mission [^]. The transfer process will require extremely high efficiency and effective boil-off management to minimize propellant loss [^].

5. Were China's Long March 10 Rocket Tests Successful and Damage-Free?

Static Fire Test DateAugust 2025 (Successful) [^]
Low-Altitude Flight Test DateFebruary 11, 2026 (Successful) [^]
Wenchang Launch Pad DamageNone reported [^]
China's Long March 10 rocket completed full-stack ground testing at the Wenchang Space Launch Site without significant anomalies. Chinese state media reported successful ground tests, including a static fire test conducted in August 2025, which verified key systems for the lunar rocket program [^]. Commercial satellite imagery analyses, alongside these reports, indicated no damage to the launch pad or other anomalies during this initial testing phase.
A subsequent flight test further demonstrated the rocket and pad's integrity and capabilities. On February 11, 2026, a successful low-altitude flight test of the Long March 10 was performed [^]. The new Wenchang launch pad, specifically designed for future lunar missions, successfully handled its first ignition flight without any damage to the flame trench or concrete, thereby confirming its robust design [^]. Overall web research, encompassing commercial satellite imagery analyses, corroborated the absence of any damage or anomalies at the Wenchang Space Launch Site related to these ground and flight tests. The successful completion of these critical tests, coupled with the reported integrity of the launch pad, indicates a positive progression for China's Long March 10 lunar rocket program [^].

6. What Are NASA HLS Funding Appropriations for FY2025 and FY2026?

NASA HLS FY2025 Budget Request$1,896.1 million [^]
NASA HLS FY2026 Budget Request$1,746.6 million [^]
NASA HLS FY2024 Operational Level$1,418.9 million [^]
Final appropriations for Human Landing System in FY2025 and FY2026 are unavailable. Specific final funding amounts appropriated by the U.S. Congress for NASA's Human Landing System (HLS) line item for fiscal years (FY) 2025 and 2026 are not explicitly stated in the available research. NASA's budget requests for HLS indicate $1,896.1 million for FY2025 [^] and $1,746.6 million for FY2026 [^]. For contextual reference, the HLS operational plan level for FY2024 was $1,418.9 million [^].
Calculating budget request-to-appropriation differences is currently not possible. Without the specific final appropriated funding amounts for the Human Landing System for FY2025 and FY2026, it is impossible to calculate the requested percentage difference between the budget requests and the final appropriations. While overall Congressional appropriations for broader categories exist, such as approximately $7,666 million for Exploration in FY2025 and $7.783 billion for FY2026 [^], these figures do not specify HLS funding. Additionally, the available research lacks detailed historical data on HLS-specific request-to-appropriation ratios for the prior three fiscal years, which precludes any comparative analysis.

7. What are the latest NASA Critical Design Review findings for AxEMU?

NASA AxEMU CDR FindingsNot explicitly stated in available sources (as of March 26, 2026) [Web Research Results] [^]
Axiom Internal Review StatusCompleted successfully in early 2026 [Web Research Results, 1] [^]
CDR Products DeliveredOver 1,200 in 2025 [Web Research Results, 3, 7] [^]
Official findings for AxEMU spacesuit's CDR are not yet publicly available. As of March 26, 2026, explicit findings from a NASA Critical Design Review (CDR) for Axiom Space's AxEMU moonwalking spacesuits are not stated in public sources. Axiom Space, the contractor, successfully completed an internal technical review in early 2026, with NASA planning to conduct a subsequent critical design sync review [^]. In 2025, Axiom delivered over 1,200 CDR products and continues to operate within the critical design phase [^], with ongoing testing of the AxEMU system, including initial crew testing and uncrewed thermal vacuum tests [^].
OIG reports identify no specific AxEMU life support safety risks. NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports have not identified unresolved safety or schedule risks specifically related to AxEMU life support systems. Recent OIG reports have primarily focused on legacy International Space Station (ISS) suits and other elements of the Artemis program, rather than directly addressing the AxEMU suits.

8. When Will China's Long March 10 and Starship HLS Launch?

Long March 10 Orbital Flight TargetLate 2026 [^]
Starship HLS Uncrewed Lunar Landing TargetJune 2027 [^]
Starship Propellant Transfer DemonstrationJune 2026 [^]
China's Long March 10 orbital test flight is targeted for late 2026. The inaugural orbital test flight of the Long March 10 rocket, specifically the Long March 10A variant paired with the Mengzhou-1 crew spacecraft, is scheduled for late 2026 [^]. As of March 26, 2026, this vehicle has not yet achieved orbital launch, although suborbital and low-altitude tests were conducted in February 2026. This mission will mark the debut for both the Long March 10A rocket and the Mengzhou-1 spacecraft [^].
SpaceX Starship HLS lunar landing is planned for mid-2027. Conversely, the successful soft landing of an uncrewed SpaceX Starship HLS on the lunar surface is targeted for June 2027, according to internal documents and reports [^]. This proposed timeline is contingent upon a planned propellant transfer demonstration, which is slated for June 2026 [^]. Starship development has experienced ongoing delays, affecting its overall schedule, with reports indicating a shift in the crewed lunar landing for NASA's Artemis 3 mission to 2028 [^].
China's Long March 10 flight is projected to occur first. Based on current projections, the orbital test flight of China's Long March 10 is expected to occur approximately six months to a year before the uncrewed Starship HLS lunar landing [^]. The Long March 10's orbital debut is projected for late 2026, preceding Starship HLS's lunar landing target of mid-2027.

9. What Could Change the Odds

Key Catalysts

Prediction markets currently indicate a strong likelihood that the United States will be the next nation to send humans to the Moon before 2031, with probabilities ranging from 68-70% [^] . China is the next contender, holding 32-37% probability [^]. The US is targeting its initial crewed lunar landing with Artemis IV in 2028, whereas China has set a goal of 2030 [^]. No other countries possess viable near-term human lunar programs [^]. Major catalysts that could shift these market probabilities are centered on the progress of the US Artemis program [^]. Significant delays in the development and integration of critical components, such as the human landing system or the Space Launch System, could diminish the US's lead [^]. Conversely, accelerated development or successful preceding missions could further strengthen its predicted success [^]. The advancement of China's human lunar exploration efforts also stands as a key catalyst [^]. Faster-than-expected progress in their planned missions, including the development of their super heavy-lift rocket and lunar lander, could increase their probability [^]. Conversely, any technical setbacks, budgetary constraints, or unexpected operational challenges could reduce their chances of reaching the Moon with humans by 2030 [^].

Key Dates & Catalysts

  • Expiration: January 01, 2031
  • Closes: January 01, 2031

10. Decision-Flipping Events

  • Trigger: Prediction markets currently indicate a strong likelihood that the United States will be the next nation to send humans to the Moon before 2031, with probabilities ranging from 68-70% [^] .
  • Trigger: China is the next contender, holding 32-37% probability [^] .
  • Trigger: The US is targeting its initial crewed lunar landing with Artemis IV in 2028, whereas China has set a goal of 2030 [^] .
  • Trigger: No other countries possess viable near-term human lunar programs [^] .

12. Historical Resolutions

No historical resolution data available for this series.