Short Answer

The model sees potential mispricing: an increase in government spending of at least $500 billion at 61.8% model vs 18.0% market, suggesting that the government is significantly more likely to increase spending by at least $500 billion in 2025 than the market anticipates.

1. Executive Verdict

  • 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' fiscal impact may exceed initial estimates. A 1.5% GDP downturn increases mandatory federal outlays significantly. Biden Administration requested $98.4 billion for FY2025 disaster relief. Dynamic models project higher FY2025 net interest outlays than CBO. * Initial federal outlay figures consistently see upward adjustments, especially defense.

Who Wins and Why

Outcome Market Model Why
At least $1 trillion 2.0% 1.0% A major new legislative package for economic stimulus or infrastructure could trigger a trillion-dollar increase.
At least $500 billion 17.0% 18.0% Increased defense spending, rising interest rates, and higher entitlement costs will push spending up.

Current Context

Government spending significantly increased in 2025, resulting in a substantial deficit. Actual outcomes for Fiscal Year 2025, which concluded on September 30, 2025, were detailed in the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) February 2026 "Budget and Economic Outlook: 2026 to 2036" [^]. Federal outlays in 2025 totaled $7.0 trillion, or 23.3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), while revenues reached $5.2 trillion, or 17.1 percent of GDP [^]. The federal budget deficit for FY 2025 was $1.8 trillion, representing 5.9 percent of GDP, marking a 2% decrease from the previous year [^]. Outlays grew by 4%, driven by increases in major benefit programs and net interest on public debt [^]. Mandatory spending accounted for 59% of projected FY2025 outlays, primarily for programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid [^]. Discretionary spending for FY2025, constrained by the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, called for $895 billion in defense and $711 billion in non-defense spending, representing a 1% increase over FY2024 [^]. Notably, net interest costs on the national debt surpassed $1 trillion in FY2025, becoming the government's second-largest expenditure after Social Security [^]. Legislation enacted in July 2025, including the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), extended 2017 tax cuts, which is a significant factor in growing deficit projections [^]. The OBBBA is estimated to increase deficits by $4.7 trillion for fiscal years 2026-2035, partially offset by $3 trillion in deficit reductions from new tariffs and a $0.5 trillion increase in deficits from immigration-related administrative actions [^].
Experts warn national debt reached unsustainable levels, posing severe economic risks. The federal debt held by the public reached approximately 100 percent of GDP by the end of FY2025, with total outstanding federal government debt reaching $36.2 trillion, or 119% of GDP, by the second quarter of 2025 [^]. The debt ceiling was subsequently raised by $5 trillion to $41.1 trillion in July 2025 [^]. The CBO projects that federal debt will rise to a record 120% of GDP by 2036, surpassing its historical peak (relative to GDP) in 2029 [^]. Organizations like the CBO, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the Peterson Foundation, and Deloitte consistently highlight the unsustainable growth trajectory of the national debt [^]. Rising debt is expected to slow economic growth, increase interest payments to foreign holders of U.S. debt, heighten the risk of a fiscal crisis, and constrain future policy choices, ultimately reducing the size of the U.S. economy, jobs, private investment, and wages over the long term [^]. The primary drivers of increased outlays are identified as growth in spending for Social Security and Medicare, coupled with rising net interest costs, with mandatory spending now comprising nearly 65% of the total budget [^]. Common concerns include the impact of rising debt and government spending on inflation, long-term economic growth, and the sustainability of entitlement programs [^]. Political gridlock, particularly related to the debt limit, continues to complicate efforts to address these fiscal challenges [^].

2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

Historical Price (Probability)

Outcome probability
Date
This prediction market has consistently priced a "YES" outcome as a low-probability event. The price has been range-bound for its entire duration, trading in a narrow band between $0.01 and $0.10. The overall trend is sideways, with the current price of $0.02 reflecting a decay toward the market's historical support level around the $0.01-$0.02 mark. The price never sustainably broke above the $0.10 resistance level, indicating that traders never assessed more than a 10% chance of a "YES" resolution. The chart reflects a market that began with skepticism and has since moved toward near-certainty of a "NO" outcome as the resolution data became available.
The price action is directly explained by the provided fiscal data. The market's name (KXGOVTSPEND-26-500B) implies a resolution based on whether the spending increase exceeded $500 billion. The official CBO report stated that FY2025 outlays grew by 4%. Calculating from a base of approximately $6.73 trillion in FY2024 (derived from the $7.0 trillion FY2025 figure), a 4% increase equates to roughly $270 billion. This figure is substantially below the likely $500 billion threshold for a "YES" resolution. Any minor price spikes earlier in the market's lifecycle, such as the move to 4.0%, likely corresponded with preliminary budget proposals or economic forecasts that suggested a larger spending increase was possible. As the fiscal year concluded and final data was released, these possibilities were priced out, causing the probability to fall to its current low level.
The total trading volume of over 97,000 contracts indicates a liquid and active market, lending credibility to its price discovery. Volume spikes during periods of higher prices suggest that moments of uncertainty about the final spending figure drove engagement, but conviction behind a "YES" outcome was never strong enough to push the price higher. The low volume accompanying the recent 2.0% price suggests that the market now considers the outcome a foregone conclusion, reducing trading incentives. Overall, market sentiment has been consistently and correctly bearish, anticipating that while spending would increase, it would not reach the significant level required for this market to resolve to "YES".

3. Significant Price Movements

Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.

📉 January 29, 2026: 14.0pp drop

Price decreased from 34.0% to 20.0%

Outcome: At least $500 billion

What happened: The primary driver of the 14.0 percentage point drop in the prediction market "How much will the government increase spending in 2025?" on January 29, 2026, was likely the traditional news regarding the federal budget and appropriations process [^]. On January 29, 2026, the American Historical Association (AHA) reported that much of the government's funding was extended at fiscal year 2025 levels until January 30, 2026 [^]. This report, which coincided with the market move, detailed that administration requests in summer 2025 sought to severely reduce or eliminate agency budgets, with current appropriations bills maintaining or slightly reducing funding for many crucial agencies, signaling lower-than-expected spending increases for 2025 [^]. Social media activity did not appear to be a primary driver; searches for influential posts or viral narratives on government spending for 2025 around that date yielded no direct, impactful findings [^]. While official deficit reports from the CBO and Treasury Department in early February 2026 later confirmed a lower deficit for the initial months of FY2026 compared to the previous year, suggesting less spending growth, these were released after the market movement and would have acted as confirmation rather than the immediate cause [^]. Therefore, traditional news was the primary driver of this price movement [^].

📈 January 23, 2026: 10.0pp spike

Price increased from 25.0% to 35.0%

Outcome: At least $500 billion

What happened: The primary driver of the 10.0 percentage point spike in the prediction market on January 23, 2026, was likely the accumulating understanding and anticipation of the significant spending increases mandated by the 2025 reconciliation act [^]. While no specific social media post from an influential figure directly caused the spike, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) later reported on February 11, 2026, that the 2025 reconciliation act increased projected deficits by an estimated $4.7 trillion and administrative actions related to immigration by $0.5 trillion, contributing to a $1.4 trillion increase in cumulative deficits over the 2026–2035 period compared to earlier projections [^]. This substantial legislative action, passed in 2025, would have had its implications for future government spending becoming clearer and more widely recognized around the time of the market movement, even before the official CBO report [^]. Social media activity around January 23, 2026, primarily focused on the looming government shutdown, which would imply a decrease or halt in spending rather than a significant increase [^]. Therefore, social media was mostly noise or irrelevant to this specific price move [^].

4. Market Data

View on Kalshi →

Contract Snapshot

The provided page content "How much will the government increase spending in 2025? Odds & Predictions" is the market title and does not contain the specific resolution criteria for YES/NO outcomes, key dates, or special settlement conditions. This information would typically be found in the market's detailed rules or resolution source, which is not present in the provided text.

Available Contracts

Market options and current pricing

Outcome bucket Yes (price) No (price) Implied probability
At least $500 billion $0.17 $0.84 17%
At least $1 trillion $0.02 $1.00 2%

Market Discussion

In 2025, public and expert discussions largely revolved around the significant increase in government spending, driven primarily by mandatory programs like Social Security and Medicare, coupled with rising interest payments on the national debt [^]. Debates highlighted concerns over fiscal responsibility, the burgeoning national debt, and perceived waste within federal agencies, with some proposals for tax changes and spending cuts contrasting with public sentiment [^]. Prediction markets generally indicated a low probability of a substantial decrease in government spending during this period [^].

5. What Was the Fiscal Impact of the 2025 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act'?

Estimated Net Deficit Increase~$3.2 trillion [^]
Gross 10-Year Tax Cuts~$4.3 trillion - $4.5 trillion [^]
Total Spending Offsets~$1.2 trillion [^]
The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" enacted significant tax policy changes. Formally known as H.R. 1, this primary legislative vehicle of summer 2025 was signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, extending expiring provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The bill originated in the House of Representatives [^], passing on May 22, 2025, with a vote of 218-214 [^]. An amended version subsequently passed the Senate on July 1, 2025, with a narrow 51-50 vote, requiring Vice President JD Vance to cast the tie-breaking vote [^]. Its contentious passage utilized the budget reconciliation process to bypass the Senate's 60-vote filibuster threshold.
The legislation projected a substantial federal deficit increase. It enacted tax cuts totaling approximately $4.3 trillion to $4.5 trillion over the ten-year budget window [^]. These cuts were partially offset by approximately $1.2 trillion in spending reductions and other measures [^]. Consequently, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated the net impact on the federal deficit to be approximately $3.2 trillion over the ten-year period [^]. Key provisions for individuals included making permanent the TCJA's individual income tax rates and brackets, maintaining the doubled standard deduction, increasing the child tax credit, and raising the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap to $40,000 for tax years 2025 through 2029 [^]. For businesses, the bill permanently established the 20% deduction for qualified business income for pass-through entities, enhancing it to 23%, and permanently set 100% bonus depreciation for eligible investments [^].

6. How Would a 2025 GDP Downturn Impact Federal Spending?

Estimated FY2025 Mandatory Outlay Increase$90 billion to $115 billion (CBO methodology [^])
Baseline 2025 Real GDP Growth Forecast1.9% (Philadelphia Fed SPF Q4 2025 [^])
Automatic Stabilizers Deficit Impact0.4% of potential GDP per 1% output gap (CBO [^])
A hypothetical 1.5 percentage point downward revision to the 2025 real GDP growth forecast would significantly increase U.S. federal mandatory outlays. Such a revision, based on CBO's official 'Rules of Thumb', is estimated to increase FY2025 mandatory outlays in the range of $90 billion to $115 billion. This impact is not derived from CBO's fiscal multipliers, which measure the effect of policy changes on GDP and typically range from 0.5 to 2.5 for direct government purchases [^]. Instead, the increase in outlays is primarily driven by automatic stabilizers.
Automatic stabilizers drive this increase in spending during economic downturns. These programs, such as Unemployment Insurance, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and Medicaid, automatically expand federal spending, providing a counter-cyclical response without requiring new legislation [^]. Based on CBO methodologies, a 1.5 percentage point widening of the output gap is estimated to increase the federal deficit by about 0.6% of potential GDP, with approximately half of this amount attributed to higher mandatory spending. The baseline 2025 real GDP growth forecast, according to the Philadelphia Fed's Survey of Professional Forecasters, currently stands at 1.9% [^].

7. What Were the Key FY2025 Disaster Relief Funding Requests?

Total Administration Request$98.4 billion [^]
FEMA DRF Requested$40 billion [^]
FEMA DRF Appropriated by Congress$29 billion [^]
The Biden Administration requested significant supplemental funding for disaster relief in FY2025. The administration sought approximately $98.4 billion in emergency supplemental funding for Fiscal Year 2025, primarily for recovery efforts from catastrophic natural disasters, including Hurricanes Helene and Milton [^]. A substantial portion of this request, $40 billion, was earmarked to replenish FEMA's Disaster Relief Fund (DRF), which had diminished to a critical balance of $3.6 billion by late November 2024 [^], [^]. Additional key requests included $3.3 billion for the Department of Defense (DoD) to repair storm-damaged military facilities and $310 million for the State Department's International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) for wastewater infrastructure [^], [^].
Congressional appropriations partially addressed these requests, creating a notable funding gap for FEMA. In response to the administration's appeal, Congress enacted the American Relief Act, 2025, which appropriated $29 billion for the FEMA DRF and $3.4 billion for DoD facility repairs [^]. While this legislation provided partial relief and averted an immediate crisis for the DRF, an $11 billion disparity exists between FEMA's requested amount and the congressional appropriation, indicating potential future budgetary strain for the agency [^], [^]. FEMA's broader FY2025 strategic priorities further include an allocation of $1 billion for pre-disaster mitigation through the BRIC Program and maintaining a $2 billion reserve within the DRF for initial operations for new catastrophic events [^].

8. Why Do FY2025 Federal Interest Outlay Projections Diverge?

Dynamic Model FY2025 Net Interest Outlay$435 Billion (Feb 2026)
CBO Baseline FY2025 Net Interest Outlay$410 Billion (Jan 2025)
Interest Cost Sensitivity~$2.8 Billion / 10 bps (10-year Treasury yield)
A dynamic model projects significantly higher FY2025 net interest outlays than the CBO. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in its January 2025 report, projected federal net interest outlays for Fiscal Year 2025 to be $410 billion. However, a dynamic model incorporating real-time market data from CME FedWatch futures and Treasury Quarterly Refunding Announcements presents a higher estimate of $435 billion for FY2025. This difference amounts to $25 billion, or 6.1%, highlighting a significant understatement by the CBO's static assumptions, which fail to capture the latest market-based expectations for Federal Reserve monetary policy and the Treasury's debt issuance strategy.
Differences in interest rate forecasts and debt strategy primarily drive this divergence. This is primarily driven by two factors. The most significant is the differing outlook on the federal funds rate: the CBO's forecast assumed a 4.0% year-end rate, whereas the dynamic model, using market data, suggests a more hawkish 5.5% peak rate held through mid-year. This higher rate path accounts for approximately $15.6 billion, or 3.8%, of the total discrepancy. Additionally, the specifics of the Treasury's debt refinancing and issuance strategy, detailed in the April 2025 Quarterly Refunding Announcement, contribute an estimated $9.4 billion, or 2.3%, to the higher projected costs.
The projected shortfall creates fiscal challenges and highlights budget sensitivity to markets. The estimated $25 billion shortfall represents a material, unbudgeted increase to the FY2025 deficit, complicating fiscal planning and potentially increasing future borrowing. This analysis also underscores the federal budget's acute sensitivity to market shifts, estimating that a 10-basis-point parallel shift in the 10-year Treasury yield could alter FY2025 net interest outlays by $2.8 billion. The dynamic, market-implied forecast therefore offers a more realistic assessment for policymakers and market participants in navigating the U.S. fiscal landscape.

9. How Will Federal Outlay Revisions Impact FY2025 Spending Predictions?

DOD Contract Obligation Reporting LagUp to 90 days [^]
Medicare FFS Improper Payment Rate6.55% ($28.83 billion) in FY2025 [^]
Medicare MA Improper Payment Rate6.09% ($23.67 billion) in FY2025 [^]
Initial U.S. federal outlay figures consistently undergo revisions, particularly for defense spending. These figures typically see upward adjustments due to structural factors, including reporting lags of up to 90 days for contract obligations and persistent financial management weaknesses within the Department of Defense. Consequently, final audited defense outlays are frequently higher than initially reported [^], [^].
Medicare reimbursements, especially for Medicare Advantage, are poised for significant downward revisions. The Medicare Advantage (MA) program's improper payment rate increased to 6.09% in FY2025, partly due to aggressive coding practices, in contrast to decreasing Medicare Fee-for-Service improper payment rates (6.55% in FY2025). A major contributing factor to downward revisions is the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) dramatic expansion of its Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audits for MA plans. This includes annual audits for all eligible contracts and clearing a backlog from previous years, an intensified recovery effort expected to identify and offset billions in overpayments, thus creating substantial downward pressure on final Medicare outlays [^], [^].
Fiscal Year 2025 is projected to be a peak adjustment year for federal outlays. The opposing forces of upward revisions in defense spending and robust downward adjustments stemming from Medicare Advantage audit recoveries are expected to converge. The accelerated CMS audit schedule significantly increases the likelihood that the final audited federal spending figure for FY2025 will be materially different, and potentially lower, than initial reports, influencing predictions on overall government spending increases [^], [^].

10. What Could Change the Odds

Key Catalysts

The prediction market's outcome regarding government spending increases in FY2025 primarily hinges on potential revisions to the initially reported figures [^] . Bullish catalysts, which could suggest a larger increase, include any forthcoming final audits or detailed reports from the Treasury Department or the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) that present upward revisions to the previously reported $275 billion or 4% increase in FY2025 outlays over FY2024 [^]. Additionally, if subsequent analysis or specific program data reveals that the spending increases within the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA) for FY2025 had a greater fiscal impact than projected, this could also push for a higher perceived increase [^]. Conversely, bearish catalysts, suggesting a smaller increase, would involve downward revisions to these FY2025 spending figures [^]. If final reconciliations or detailed analyses from the Treasury or CBO report a smaller increase in FY2025 spending compared to FY2024, this would act as a bearish factor [^]. Moreover, while directly pertaining to FY2026, a highly contentious and fiscally conservative resolution to ongoing FY2026 budget negotiations and appropriations could, in rare instances, prompt a re-evaluation or stricter interpretation of prior year spending, or more prominently highlight spending offsets [^]. Investors will closely monitor official data releases and ongoing political developments before the April 1, 2026, settlement date [^]. Any final revisions to FY2025 spending data, expected in March 2026, will be particularly critical [^]. The political climate and final spending outcomes from ongoing FY2026 budget negotiations in February and March 2026 could also influence market sentiment regarding overall fiscal trends and the interpretation of the FY2025 figures [^].

Key Dates & Catalysts

  • Expiration: April 01, 2026
  • Closes: April 01, 2026

11. Decision-Flipping Events

  • Trigger: The prediction market's outcome regarding government spending increases in FY2025 primarily hinges on potential revisions to the initially reported figures [^] .
  • Trigger: Bullish catalysts, which could suggest a larger increase, include any forthcoming final audits or detailed reports from the Treasury Department or the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) that present upward revisions to the previously reported $275 billion or 4% increase in FY2025 outlays over FY2024 [^] .
  • Trigger: Additionally, if subsequent analysis or specific program data reveals that the spending increases within the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA) for FY2025 had a greater fiscal impact than projected, this could also push for a higher perceived increase [^] .
  • Trigger: Conversely, bearish catalysts, suggesting a smaller increase, would involve downward revisions to these FY2025 spending figures [^] .

13. Historical Resolutions

Historical Resolutions: 2 markets in this series

Outcomes: 2 resolved YES, 0 resolved NO

Recent resolutions:

  • KXGOVTSPEND-26-1B: YES (Apr 30, 2025)
  • KXGOVTSPEND-26-100B: YES (Aug 06, 2025)