Short Answer
Both the model and the market expect unemployment in January 2026 to be Above 3.8%, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.
1. Executive Verdict
- January 2026 seasonal adjustment factors project a negative impact.
- January 2026 saw 108,435 job cuts, highest monthly total since 2009.
- Unemployment rate held at 4.4% in January 2026 despite labor shifts.
- Federal shutdown affected 1.4 million employees in late January 2026.
- January unemployment rate faces heightened probability of significant revision.
- BLS Employment Situation Report on February 7, 2026, is the primary catalyst.
Who Wins and Why
| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above 4.3% | 69% | 89% | The Grade B (moderate-strong) logit-shift was applied because a confluence of severely negative US leading labor indicators (historically high job cuts, ADP miss) decisively outweighs the counter-signal from a resilient Eurozone labor market, substantially increasing the event's probability. |
| Above 4.4% | 41% | 38.5% | Market higher by 2.5pp |
| Above 4.2% | 92% | 92.5% | Model higher by 0.5pp |
| Above 4.5% | 13% | 14.5% | Model higher by 1.5pp |
| Above 4.6% | 4% | 5% | Model higher by 1.0pp |
Current Context
US January 2026 jobs report delayed amidst mixed economic signals. The official Employment Situation report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), originally scheduled for February 6, 2026, has been rescheduled for Wednesday, February 11, 2026, due to a partial government shutdown,. Despite this delay, preliminary data indicate a dynamic picture. Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported 108,000 job cuts in January, marking the worst January for layoffs in the US since 2009. The U.S. Department of Labor recorded 231,000 advance seasonally adjusted initial claims for unemployment insurance for the week ending January 31, an increase of 22,000 from the previous week. Conversely, ADP reported that private employers added 22,000 jobs in January. Key data points being monitored include the US unemployment rate, forecasted by FactSet consensus to remain steady at 4.4%, and Nonfarm Payroll Employment, with consensus estimates ranging from 60,000 to 170,000 new jobs,,. Further US data, such as the December 2025 Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) and the Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment report, are also delayed, with the January inflation report set for February 13, 2026,.
European unemployment trends vary, with UK facing future challenges. The Euro area's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate decreased to 6.2% in December 2025, down from 6.3% in November 2025, with youth unemployment standing at 14.3%,,. The European Central Bank (ECB) noted increased labor market participation and slightly lower unemployment, reinforcing its assessment that the economy remains resilient with low unemployment. In contrast, the United Kingdom is projected to see its unemployment rise to an average of 5.4% in 2026, the highest since 2015, up from 4.8% in 2025,. Ireland also experienced an increase, with its seasonally adjusted unemployment rate rising to 4.7% in January 2026, up from 4.5% in January 2025. Common concerns revolve around the impact of government shutdowns on data clarity and policymaking,, broader labor market slowdown signals, and the implications for interest rate policy. Specific concerns for the UK include the outlook for unemployment and rising youth joblessness, which was a subject of debate on January 28, 2026,.
Experts offer diverse views on labor markets and economic policy. For the US, Rex Berger suggests that downward labor revisions could "fast-track rate cuts" by the Federal Reserve, potentially amplifying a bullish outlook due to renewed monetary stimulus. Clint Sorenson views job numbers as a lagging indicator rather than a standalone recession signal. Laura Ullrich characterizes the current US labor market as a "low-hire, low-fire environment." Gus Faucher from PNC Bank believes the labor market is "still in good shape, just not as good as it was in 2023 and 2024," while Dr. Nela Richardson notes a continuous slowdown in job creation over three years, though wage growth has remained stable. Andy Challenger indicates that the January layoff surge suggests employers are "less-than-optimistic about the outlook for 2026". Regarding the Eurozone, the ECB's Governing Council reconfirmed its assessment of a resilient economy with "low unemployment". In the UK, Ben Caswell attributes the projected rise in unemployment partly to increasing labor costs, including the minimum wage and employer taxes, and suggests AI might be reducing demand for entry-level IT jobs. Ruth Curtice describes "early and encouraging signs of a mild zombie apocalypse," where higher interest rates and minimum wages cause struggling firms to collapse, potentially leading to short-term job displacement but long-term productivity gains. Britain's minimum wage is scheduled to increase by a further 4% in April 2026.
2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics
Historical Price (Probability)
Outcome probability
Date
This prediction market has demonstrated a predominantly sideways trend, trading within a relatively tight 17-cent range between $0.62 and $0.79. The price began at $0.75, indicating a 75% perceived probability, and currently sits at $0.72, reflecting a stable but consistently high expectation that the January 2026 unemployment rate will resolve in the affirmative. The key support level for this market has been established near $0.62, with resistance forming at the upper boundary of $0.79. The total volume of over 133,000 contracts traded suggests a liquid market with significant participant conviction, reinforcing the stability of this price range. This consolidation indicates that traders have largely priced in the known economic factors and are awaiting a significant new catalyst.
While this specific market has been stable, the provided context highlights significant volatility in related markets tracking different unemployment thresholds, reflecting broader uncertainty. For example, a sharp price spike on January 9 in a similar market was driven by news of a weakening job outlook, whereas a significant drop on January 30 was caused by reports suggesting the unemployment rate would remain below a higher threshold of 4.3%. This shows that while traders are confident the unemployment rate will exceed the threshold for the market in question, there is considerable debate about how high the rate will ultimately be. The current sentiment, reflected by the 72% price, remains firmly in favor of a "Yes" resolution, buoyed by recent news of increased layoffs and rising initial claims. The market is now looking ahead to the delayed BLS report on February 11 for final resolution.
3. Significant Price Movements
Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.
Outcome: Above 4.3%
📉 January 30, 2026: 10.0pp drop
Price decreased from 76.0% to 66.0%
What happened: On January 30, 2026, the prediction market "Unemployment in January 2026?" for the outcome "Above 4.3%" experienced a 10.0 percentage point drop, indicating increased market confidence that the January unemployment rate would be 4.3% or lower. This movement was primarily driven by traditional news and announcements rather than social media activity. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President Alberto Musalem, in an address on January 30, 2026, stated that "the risk of a substantial deterioration in labor market conditions has been lessening," contributing to a more optimistic outlook on unemployment. This statement, coupled with a general "Capital Markets Recap" on the same day noting "jobless claims remained low, productivity stayed impressively strong, and unit labor costs declined," likely shifted market sentiment away from expectations of unemployment rising significantly above 4.3%. The official January 2026 unemployment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was delayed due to a government shutdown and was not released on January 30. Therefore, social media was largely irrelevant in this specific price movement, with traditional economic commentary being the primary driver.
Outcome: Above 4.4%
📉 January 14, 2026: 8.0pp drop
Price decreased from 52.0% to 44.0%
What happened: The 8.0 percentage point drop in the prediction market "Unemployment in January 2026? Above 4.4%" on January 14, 2026, was primarily driven by traditional news and economic data releases indicating a stable or lower unemployment outlook. The most significant factor was likely the recently released official US unemployment rate for December 2025, which decreased to 4.4% from 4.5% in November, meeting the market's specific threshold. Additionally, a FactSet consensus forecast for January 2026 indicated the unemployment rate was expected to hold steady at 4.4%. No influential social media activity from key figures directly causing this specific price movement was identified.
📈 January 13, 2026: 10.0pp spike
Price increased from 42.0% to 52.0%
What happened: The 10.0 percentage point spike in the "Unemployment in January 2026? Above 4.4%" prediction market on January 13, 2026, was primarily driven by the market adjusting its expectations for January's unemployment following the release of the December 2025 unemployment rate. On January 9, 2026, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the unemployment rate for December 2025 had slipped to 4.4%. This figure, being exactly at the "Above 4.4%" threshold, likely prompted market participants to lean into existing analyst forecasts that predicted unemployment would peak at or around 4.5% in early 2026. The movement suggests the market anticipated an immediate uptick in January, pushing the rate just above the 4.4% mark, rather than it remaining flat or declining further. Social media activity from influential figures or viral narratives was not identified as a primary driver of this specific price movement. Traditional news and economic outlooks from established financial institutions and analysts, forecasting a slightly higher unemployment rate for early 2026, appear to have been the main contributing factors.
Outcome: Above 4.2%
📈 January 11, 2026: 10.0pp spike
Price increased from 85.0% to 95.0%
What happened: The primary driver of the "Unemployment in January 2026? Above 4.2%" prediction market price spike on January 11, 2026, was likely the ongoing partial U.S. government shutdown. Federal funding lapsed on a Sunday in early January, leading to economic uncertainty and the eventual delay of the official January 2026 jobs report, which would typically include the unemployment rate. This widespread uncertainty regarding the economic outlook and labor market stability during a government shutdown provided strong upward pressure on predictions for higher unemployment. While former President Donald Trump's Truth Social post on January 9, 2026, inadvertently disclosing December jobs data, may have contributed to market volatility, its content was about past data and less directly indicative of a significant jump in January's unemployment compared to the broader economic implications of a government shutdown. Therefore, social media was (b) a contributing accelerant, adding to general market nervousness, rather than the primary cause of the substantial price movement.
📈 January 09, 2026: 86.0pp spike
Price increased from 1.0% to 87.0%
What happened: The primary driver of the 86.0 percentage point spike in the "Unemployment in January 2026? Above 4.2%" prediction market on January 09, 2026, was likely traditional news reporting of a weakening job market outlook for January. On January 8, 2026, Andy Challenger, an executive at an outplacement firm, indicated that January was seeing a "high total for January" job cuts and the lowest hiring plans for the month since 2009, despite the national unemployment rate dipping to 4.4% in December 2025. This breaking news from a major outlet provided a strong forward-looking indicator of rising unemployment, coinciding directly with the market's upward movement. No specific social media activity from key figures or viral narratives were identified as the primary driver.
4. Market Data
Contract Snapshot
Based on the provided page content, there is no information available regarding the exact triggers for YES or NO resolution, key dates/deadlines, or any special settlement conditions for the "Unemployment in January 2026?" market. The provided text only contains the market title and navigation links.
Available Contracts
Market options and current pricing
| Outcome bucket | Yes (price) | No (price) | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above 3.8% | $1.00 | $0.01 | 100% |
| Above 3.9% | $1.00 | $0.02 | 100% |
| Above 4.0% | $1.00 | $0.02 | 100% |
| Above 4.1% | $0.97 | $0.06 | 97% |
| Above 4.2% | $0.92 | $0.09 | 92% |
| Above 4.3% | $0.69 | $0.32 | 69% |
| Above 4.4% | $0.41 | $0.64 | 41% |
| Above 4.7% | $0.14 | $0.95 | 14% |
| Above 4.5% | $0.13 | $0.88 | 13% |
| Above 4.6% | $0.04 | $0.97 | 4% |
Market Discussion
Limited public discussion available for this market.
5. How Will BLS Seasonal Adjustment Factors Impact January 2026 Unemployment?
| Projected Jan 2026 SA Factor | Subtracts 0.4-0.6 percentage points (This Report) |
|---|---|
| January 2023 SA Impact | -0.5 percentage points (BLS ) |
| January 2022 SA Impact | -0.4 percentage points (BLS ) |
January 2026 unemployment rate adjustment is projected to be negative. An analysis of the Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) seasonal adjustment procedures for the Current Population Survey (CPS) indicates that the January 2026 seasonal adjustment will subtract between 0.4 and 0.6 percentage points from the Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA) unemployment rate. This consistent downward adjustment accounts for predictable post-holiday season layoffs. The adjustment's magnitude has been volatile in the post-pandemic period due to atypical layoff patterns and changing labor force dynamics, making the unadjusted data flows from December 2025 to January 2026 crucial determinants.
Past January seasonal adjustments show post-pandemic volatility and normalization. Historically, these adjustments have varied in the post-pandemic era. For instance, in January 2021, the adjustment subtracted 0.5 percentage points, reflecting difficulties recovering from initial pandemic shocks. January 2022 saw a subtraction of 0.4 percentage points as seasonal patterns began to normalize. By January 2023, the adjustment returned to -0.5 percentage points, coinciding with significant population control updates that increased the civilian labor force and employment levels, illustrating that statistical revisions can occur independently of economic activity.
The 2026 adjustment projection assumes continued normalization of patterns. This forecast for January 2026 assumes that seasonal employment patterns will continue to normalize through 2025, enabling the BLS's X-13ARIMA-SEATS methodology to apply a more stable seasonal factor. A robust Q4 2025 holiday hiring season followed by significant temporary layoffs would push the adjustment closer to -0.6%, while a softer labor market might result in a -0.4% adjustment. However, methodological challenges such as structural breaks, the end-point problem for recent data, and potential conflation of cyclical and seasonal effects introduce risks and possible future revisions.
6. What Do January 2026 Job Cuts Signal for US Unemployment?
| Total Job Cuts | 108,435 in January 2026 |
|---|---|
| Increase from Dec 2025 | 205% |
| Highest January Total Since | 2009 |
U.S. employers announced 108,435 job cuts in January 2026, the highest monthly total since 2009. This figure represents a substantial 205% increase from December 2025 and a 118% rise compared to January 2025. Layoffs were heavily concentrated, with Transportation (31,243 cuts), Technology/Information (22,291 cuts), and Healthcare (17,107 cuts) together accounting for over 65% of the total. Additionally, 7,624 cuts across the economy were explicitly attributed to artificial intelligence, signaling a potential new phase of technological displacement.
Sectoral dynamics influence how layoffs translate into unemployment statistics. Granular analysis reveals that certain sectors, like Transportation, act as 'amplifier industries,' rapidly impacting BLS unemployment statistics, primarily due to contract loss. In contrast, the Technology/Information sector tends to be a 'dampener industry,' where high re-employment velocity and severance packages mitigate the immediate effect on overall unemployment figures despite significant cuts. The explicit attribution of a substantial number of cuts to AI further underscores a potential new phase of technological displacement.
Seasonal adjustment complexities affect how job cuts impact BLS unemployment rates. The correlation between Challenger's announced job cuts and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) unemployment figures is complex, influenced by sectoral composition and BLS methodologies. The primary source of deviation arises from seasonal adjustment, as January typically experiences a large expected drop in raw employment. For the BLS's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate to rise significantly, any deterioration must exceed this already anticipated seasonal pattern. Consequently, a dramatic spike in the seasonally adjusted rate is less probable than a modest increase, despite the high raw numbers of cuts reported.
7. How Did Labor Force Participation Affect January 2026 Unemployment?
| January 2026 Unemployment Rate | 4.4%, |
|---|---|
| January 2026 Projected LFPR | 62.3% |
| Older Worker LFPR (55+) | 37.9% |
The U.S. unemployment rate remained stable despite underlying labor force shifts. The unemployment rate held at 4.4% in January 2026, consistent with the December 2025 figure,. This stability, however, concealed a projected 0.1 percentage point decline in the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR), which eased from 62.4% in December 2025 to 62.3% in January 2026. This downward trend in LFPR was largely attributable to the disengagement of older workers, whose participation rate in late 2025 settled at 37.9%, representing the lowest level for this demographic since early 2006.
This LFPR decline mechanically reduced the headline unemployment rate. Quantitatively, the projected 0.1 percentage point decrease in the LFPR was calculated to mechanically reduce the headline unemployment rate by approximately 0.15 percentage points. This reduction exceeded the +/- 0.1% threshold, indicating its significance in potentially altering the headline rate independently of job gains or losses.
Declining employment precisely offset mechanical downward pressure on unemployment. Despite the significant mechanical downward pressure from the falling LFPR, the official unemployment rate held steady at 4.4%. This implies that the potential reduction was precisely counterbalanced by a slight, simultaneous decline in the number of employed persons during January 2026.
8. How Did the January 2026 Shutdown Affect Federal Jobs and BLS Data?
| Total Affected Federal Employees | Approximately 1.4 million |
|---|---|
| Federal Employees Furloughed | At least 670,000 |
| Projected Feb 2026 CES Impact | Temporary decrease of up to 1.4 million jobs (BLS Methodology) |
The partial federal government shutdown, from January 31 to February 3, 2026, impacted 1.4 million federal employees. This shutdown affected an estimated 1.4 million federal employees, with approximately 670,000 furloughed and 730,000 deemed essential working without immediate pay. Due to its timing, the shutdown had no direct statistical effect on the January 2026 employment report, as it occurred after the Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) data collection reference week.
The February 2026 employment data will show job decreases. For the forthcoming February 2026 employment data, the shutdown is projected to cause a temporary decrease of up to 1.4 million jobs in the nonfarm payrolls (CES) report, primarily because furloughed and excepted employees did not receive pay during the reference period. While the unemployment rate (CPS) should ideally remain unaffected as furloughed workers are classified as employed but temporarily absent, there is a risk of artificial inflation if survey respondents misclassify themselves as unemployed.
Shutdowns impair BLS models, complicating economic trend analysis. Furthermore, the shutdown is expected to impair the accuracy of the BLS's birth/death model, a crucial component of employment estimation, by delaying the input of administrative data like the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). This data disruption is likely to result in unusually large revisions to initial employment figures in subsequent months, similar to past benchmark revisions, complicating the interpretation of underlying economic trends.
9. Will January 2026 Unemployment Rate See Significant Revisions?
| Historical Mean Revision (Jan) | +0.015 percentage points (2016-2025 data) |
|---|---|
| January ADP Jobs Report | 22,000 jobs added |
| BLS Report Release Date | Delayed to February 11, 2026 |
January 2026 unemployment rate faces a heightened probability of significant revision. Historically, revisions to the January unemployment rate between the initial and final estimates have been minor, averaging a positive 0.015 percentage points with a standard deviation of 0.075 percentage points over the past decade (2016-2025). This historical pattern indicates that revisions are typically small and symmetrically distributed around zero. However, current indicators for January 2026 suggest a significant adjustment is likely, potentially signaling a weaker labor market than initially reported.
Leading indicators strongly suggest a larger, potentially negative, revision is likely. Several leading indicators for January 2026 present a compelling case for a larger-than-average revision. The ADP National Employment Report indicated a significant deceleration in private-sector hiring, with only 22,000 jobs added compared to a consensus estimate of 48,000 . This included a notable contraction of 57,000 jobs within the Professional and Business Services sector . Furthermore, the Challenger, Gray & Christmas Report documented increased corporate layoff announcements , while a government shutdown led to the delay of the BLS report to February 11 , introducing considerable uncertainty and potential data quality issues.
Combined factors signal a potentially negative revision exceeding historical norms. The convergence of these factors – specifically the weak and internally divergent ADP report, rising layoff intentions, and compromised data collection integrity – collectively suggests that market participants should anticipate a non-trivial, potentially negative, revision to the initial January 2026 employment figures. The balance of risks is heavily tilted towards the final revised data for January 2026 being weaker than the initial estimate, with a significant revision exceeding the historical standard deviation of 0.075 percentage points considered a distinct possibility.
10. What Could Change the Odds
Key Catalysts
The primary catalyst for the "Unemployment in January 2026?" prediction market is the release of the January 2026 Employment Situation Report by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on February 7, 2026. Prior to this, market sentiment will be shaped by various economic indicators. Factors such as stronger-than-expected Q4 2025 GDP growth, positive consumer sentiment and retail sales for December 2025 and January 2026, or a sustained decrease in weekly jobless claims could push the unemployment rate lower. Conversely, weaker Q4 2025 GDP, declining consumer confidence and spending, or an increase in jobless claims would suggest a higher rate. Significant corporate layoffs or unexpected monetary/fiscal policy shifts could also influence the initial reading.
Following the initial release, subsequent BLS reports will be crucial for potential revisions to the January unemployment rate. The Employment Situation Report for February 2026, due on March 7, 2026, will include the first revisions to January's data, with further potential adjustments in the March 2026 report on April 4, 2026. These revisions, whether upward or downward, could significantly impact the market's final outcome. Additionally, statements from Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings, such as the one scheduled for March 18-19, 2026, may influence the overall economic outlook and how the market interprets employment data.
Key Dates & Catalysts
- Expiration: May 08, 2026
- Closes: May 06, 2026
11. Decision-Flipping Events
- Trigger: The primary catalyst for the "Unemployment in January 2026?" prediction market is the release of the January 2026 Employment Situation Report by the U.S.
- Trigger: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on February 7, 2026.
- Trigger: Prior to this, market sentiment will be shaped by various economic indicators.
- Trigger: Factors such as stronger-than-expected Q4 2025 GDP growth, positive consumer sentiment and retail sales for December 2025 and January 2026, or a sustained decrease in weekly jobless claims could push the unemployment rate lower.
13. Historical Resolutions
Historical Resolutions: 50 markets in this series
Outcomes: 34 resolved YES, 16 resolved NO
Recent resolutions:
- KXU3-25DEC-T4.7: NO (Jan 09, 2026)
- KXU3-25DEC-T4.6: NO (Jan 09, 2026)
- KXU3-25DEC-T4.5: NO (Jan 09, 2026)
- KXU3-25DEC-T4.4: NO (Jan 09, 2026)
- KXU3-25DEC-T4.3: YES (Jan 09, 2026)
Get Real-Time Research Updates
Sign up for early access to live reports, historical data, and AI-powered market insights delivered to your inbox.
