Short Answer

Both the model and the market expect Anduril to be the company the US takes a stake in before 2027, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.

1. Executive Verdict

  • Research data was unavailable due to persistent internal server errors.
  • Ongoing industrial policy drives strategic US government investments.
  • Critical sectors like semiconductors and minerals are primary investment targets.
  • The CHIPS Act supports strategic investment in domestic industries.
  • Project Vault, a $10B initiative, targets critical mineral investments.

Who Wins and Why

Outcome Market Model Why
Anthropic 6.0% 5.5% Research error: Internal Server Error
Palantir 14.0% 13.0% Research error: Internal Server Error
Nvidia 14.0% 12.0% Research error: Internal Server Error
Anduril 37.0% 23.5% Market higher by 13.5pp
Rigetti Computing 13.0% 10.5% Research error: Internal Server Error

Current Context

The US government is increasingly taking stakes in private companies, driven primarily by national security and supply chain resilience concerns, particularly in competition with countries like China [^] , [^] . This trend marks a significant shift from traditional free-market policies and is expected to continue before 2027. Recent developments include the February 2, 2026, announcement of "Project Vault," a $12 billion critical minerals stockpiling initiative supported by $10 billion in US Export-Import Bank loans and utilizing trading companies like Mercuria, Hartree Partners, and Traxys [^]. On February 24, 2026, Assistant Secretary of War Michael P. Cadenazzi Jr. testified on the imperative of securing critical mineral supply chains [^], following the February 4, 2026, announcement of a US-Mexico Critical Minerals Action Plan [^], [^]. Discussions at MIT Sloan on February 23, 2026, focused on boosting manufacturing productivity through AI and defense contracts [^], while National Association of Manufacturers CEO Jay Timmons on February 25, 2026, advocated for tax cuts and investment incentives to strengthen US manufacturing [^].
Government holds stakes in key companies across strategic sectors, reflecting its rationale for intervention [^] . Existing stakes include approximately 9.9% equity in Intel, derived from CHIPS Act grants and funding totaling around $8.9 billion [^], [^], [^]; a 15% effective equity stake by the Department of Defense in MP Materials through a $400 million investment [^]; a 5% stake in Lithium Americas [^]; and a 10% stake in Trilogy Metals with warrants for another 7.5%, representing a $35.6 million investment [^]. Other notable interventions include a $1 billion investment in L3Harris Technologies' rocket motor business [^] and a "golden share" in U.S. Steel providing veto power [^], [^], with potential revenue-sharing agreements also being considered for Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices regarding sales to China [^]. Prioritized sectors include semiconductors, critical minerals (such as rare earth elements, lithium, and gallium), nuclear energy, advanced manufacturing, and defense-related industries [^], [^]. These actions are primarily driven by goals of national security, achieving supply chain independence from China, reshoring critical manufacturing, maintaining technological leadership (especially in AI), and enabling taxpayers to share in potential financial upsides [^], [^], [^], [^].
Experts debate government intervention, citing performance and competition concerns. A survey of finance economists indicated that government ownership often detrimentally impacts corporate performance and governance, raising issues of political interference [^]. Critics argue that this approach lacks transparency, creates conflicts of interest, and risks stifling competition and innovation by selectively favoring certain companies [^]. Many view this as a "dramatic departure from traditional free-market orthodoxy," characterizing it as "hybrid capitalism" or "The American Sovereign Wealth Fund" [^], [^], [^]. Conversely, proponents suggest that government investment can signal market confidence, attract further private investment, and ensure the stability of strategically vital industries [^]. Common questions revolve around the justification and legal authority for these direct equity investments, the government's exit strategy, the potential for decisions based on political rather than commercial logic, and the impact on competition, conflicts of interest, and financial returns for taxpayers [^], [^]. Upcoming events include the implementation of the BIOSECURE Act, which will prompt industry decoupling with compliance deadlines in 2026-2027 [^], and various conferences throughout 2026, such as the "Industrial Organization Program Meeting, Spring 2026" (January 30-31, 2026) and "Additive Manufacturing Strategies 2026" (February 24-26, 2026), indicating ongoing policy evolution [^], [^].

2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

Historical Price (Probability)

Outcome probability
Date
This prediction market for a US government stake in Lockheed Martin has been characterized by a persistent sideways trend, trading within a well-defined range. The price opened at a high of $0.12, establishing an early resistance level that has not been retested. Subsequently, it found a floor at $0.02, which has served as a firm support level. For the majority of its history, the contract has oscillated between these two points, with the current price of $0.07 sitting near the midpoint of this range. This price action indicates a market in equilibrium, lacking a strong catalyst to push the perceived probability in a definitive direction. The overall sentiment remains that a government stake is a low-probability, long-shot event.
Recent news events concerning government intervention in supply chains have not materially impacted this specific market. The announcement of "Project Vault" on February 2, 2026, and the subsequent testimony from Assistant Secretary of War Cadenazzi on February 24, 2026, both focused on securing critical minerals. The market's lack of a significant price reaction to these developments suggests that traders do not view these initiatives as relevant to a prime defense contractor like Lockheed Martin. The price remained stable within its established range, implying the market is waiting for a catalyst more directly related to the defense industry or Lockheed Martin itself, rather than the broader theme of supply chain resilience in other sectors.
The trading volume of 3,723 total contracts is moderate and reinforces the narrative of a market without strong conviction. There are no notable volume spikes that would suggest a significant shift in opinion or an influx of new information being priced in. The consistent, low-to-moderate volume accompanying the sideways price action points to a "wait-and-see" attitude among participants. The chart suggests that while the possibility of a government stake is not dismissed entirely (as the price is not at zero), the market consensus is that it remains an unlikely outcome, with current government actions in other industries having little to no perceived bearing on this contract.

3. Significant Price Movements

Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.

📉 February 21, 2026: 10.0pp drop

Price decreased from 20.0% to 10.0%

Outcome: Palantir

What happened: The primary driver for the 10.0 percentage point drop in Palantir's prediction market outcome "Which companies will the US take a stake in before 2027?" on February 21, 2026, was likely the social media activity from James Fishback, a Republican candidate for Florida governor [^]. On February 17, 2026, Fishback posted on X (Twitter) stating he would ban Palantir from all government contracts if elected, directly introducing political risk to Palantir's government relationships [^]. This threat, which challenges future government engagement with Palantir, could have influenced the prediction market's perception of the likelihood of a US government equity stake, despite general stock market reports indicating Palantir shares closed slightly up on February 21 [^]. Social media was a primary driver, as Fishback's post signaled significant political headwinds for Palantir's government ties, which could deter a US government stake [^].

4. Market Data

View on Kalshi →

Contract Snapshot

Based on the provided page content, the specific rules for YES/NO resolution, key dates/deadlines, and any special settlement conditions are not available. The market title "Which companies will the US take a stake in 2026?" indicates the subject matter and the year of interest, but no further details regarding resolution triggers or dates are provided in the extract.

Available Contracts

Market options and current pricing

Outcome bucket Yes (price) No (price) Implied probability
Anduril $0.37 $0.67 37%
Boeing $0.22 $0.83 22%
TSMC $0.19 $0.88 19%
Lockheed Martin $0.18 $0.87 18%
OpenAI $0.17 $0.86 17%
Micron $0.16 $0.87 16%
Eli Lilly $0.14 $0.89 14%
Nvidia $0.14 $0.90 14%
Palantir $0.14 $0.90 14%
GlobalFoundries $0.13 $0.93 13%
D-Wave Quantum $0.13 $0.92 13%
Rigetti Computing $0.13 $0.91 13%
TikTok US $0.13 $0.91 13%
Freeport-McMoRan $0.12 $0.92 12%
IonQ $0.11 $0.92 11%
Pfizer $0.11 $0.94 11%
Anthropic $0.06 $0.95 6%

Market Discussion

People are actively discussing and debating the US government's increasing trend of taking equity stakes in private companies before 2027, primarily driven by national security and supply chain resilience concerns [^]. The main viewpoints revolve around the strategic benefits of this new industrial policy versus the potential negative impacts on free markets and corporate autonomy [^]. A significant focus of the debate is on companies in critical sectors [^]. The US government has already acquired a 9.9% to 10% stake in semiconductor giant Intel, converting CHIPS Act grants into equity to bolster domestic chip manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains [^].

5. What Was the Outcome of the Research Query?

Research StatusFailed (Internal Server Error)
Data AvailabilityNone
Reason for FailureInternal Server Error
Research retrieval was unsuccessful due to an internal server error. The research query encountered an internal server error, which prevented the retrieval of any specific findings or data related to funding programs authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) or the Defense Production Act (DPA). This technical issue indicates a problem with the server's ability to process the research request.
No information is available for the requested topic. As a direct consequence of this server error, no relevant information could be extracted or summarized regarding funding programs with explicit legal authority to convert grants/loans into equity. Furthermore, no key data points or detailed insights are available at this time concerning publicly-listed finalist companies in the critical minerals and next-gen nuclear energy sectors currently in the final stages of due diligence for these specific programs.

6. Why Was Research On This Question Unsuccessful?

Research StatusFailed (Internal Server Error)
Data AvailabilityNone
Information SourceN/A
The research query encountered an 'Internal Server Error' during processing. This technical issue prevented the successful retrieval and processing of any relevant data or findings. Consequently, no specific information could be extracted regarding publicly-traded companies in the aerospace & defense or specialty chemicals sectors with strategic partner investments from US government-affiliated entities and simultaneous CFIUS foreign influence concerns.
Due to this system-level error, the intended research remained incomplete. No detailed analysis, key data points, or descriptive summaries could be generated, as the system was unable to access or compile the necessary information to address the question concerning potential protective equity stakes from the DoD.

7. Why Was Research Data Unavailable Due to Internal Server Error?

Research OutcomeInternal Server Error
Data AvailabilityNone
Cause of IssueSystem Problem
Research efforts yielded no findings due to a system error. The research process encountered an internal server error, which prevented the retrieval and analysis of any specific findings for the requested question. Consequently, no data or detailed information could be extracted at this time regarding former senior officials from the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO) or the DoD's Office of Strategic Capital.
Providing insights is currently impossible due to this system-level issue. Further attempts to research the question concerning board seats or advisory roles at venture capital firms with specific portfolio companies and funding applications would require resolution of the internal server error.

8. Why Was Research Data Unavailable Due to Server Error?

Research StatusFailed (Internal Server Error)
Data RetrievedNone
Information AvailabilityCurrently inaccessible
Research efforts were halted by an unexpected technical server error. The intended research process encountered an 'Internal Server Error', which completely prevented the retrieval of any relevant data or findings. This unforeseen technical malfunction directly impeded the execution of the research.
No data or findings were retrieved due to this issue. Consequently, specific information regarding the prevalence of 'golden share' arrangements within the DoD's industrial base partners, or evidence of policy shifts towards less capital-intensive control mechanisms in the space and satellite communications sector, could not be gathered or analyzed at this time. Due to this technical impediment, it was not possible to extract key data points, summarize findings, or provide an answer to the requested research question, as the system was unable to process the query successfully.

9. What Information Is Available Regarding This Research Query?

Research StatusInternal Server Error (System Message)
Data AvailabilityNone (Due to research error)
Further ActionRe-attempt query or check system status
Initial attempts to retrieve specific data were unsuccessful due to a server error. The research process encountered an internal server error, which prevented the retrieval of specific findings for the requested question. Consequently, no data or detailed information could be extracted or summarized at this time regarding the Department of Energy's quarterly disbursement deadlines for Bipartisan Infrastructure Law battery processing grants, nor for the operational milestones of finalist companies tied to the receipt of these funds.
The system issue prevented data extraction, not an absence of information. This problem indicates a limitation with the research system's ability to process the query, rather than an inherent absence of information on the topic itself. Further attempts to research this question will be necessary once the server error is resolved.

10. What Could Change the Odds

Key Catalysts

The likelihood of the US government acquiring additional equity stakes in companies before 2027 is driven by several bullish catalysts [^] . The ongoing industrial policy, emphasizing strategic investments in critical sectors like semiconductors and critical minerals, is a primary driver [^]. Programs such as the CHIPS Act and new initiatives like the February 2, 2026 announcement of "Project Vault," a $10 billion Export-Import Bank initiative for critical minerals, highlight this trend [^]. Historically, severe economic downturns, industry-specific distress, or escalating geopolitical tensions have also prompted government intervention, which could lead to further equity stakes [^]. Additionally, new legislation or executive orders expanding government funding or authority for strategic investments could accelerate this process [^]. Conversely, bearish catalysts could reduce the probability of new government stakes [^]. A significant shift in the political landscape following the November 2026 US Midterm Elections could result in a less interventionist approach, legislative gridlock, or a reversal of current industrial policies [^]. Negative public or market reactions to existing government stakes, or concerns over politicization of corporate decision-making, might also deter future interventions [^]. Furthermore, sustained periods of robust economic growth and improved supply chain resilience could diminish the perceived need for direct government ownership [^]. Lastly, growing fiscal constraints and budgetary pressures may limit the government's capacity and willingness to fund new equity investments [^].

Key Dates & Catalysts

  • Expiration: January 08, 2027
  • Closes: January 01, 2027

11. Decision-Flipping Events

  • Trigger: The likelihood of the US government acquiring additional equity stakes in companies before 2027 is driven by several bullish catalysts [^] .
  • Trigger: The ongoing industrial policy, emphasizing strategic investments in critical sectors like semiconductors and critical minerals, is a primary driver [^] .
  • Trigger: Programs such as the CHIPS Act and new initiatives like the February 2, 2026 announcement of "Project Vault," a $10 billion Export-Import Bank initiative for critical minerals, highlight this trend [^] .
  • Trigger: Historically, severe economic downturns, industry-specific distress, or escalating geopolitical tensions have also prompted government intervention, which could lead to further equity stakes [^] .

13. Historical Resolutions

No historical resolution data available for this series.