Short Answer
Both the model and the market expect Bitcoin to go below $62,500.00 in February, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.
1. Executive Verdict
- U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced significant outflows in late January.
- Largest long liquidation cluster exists between $63,000 and $65,000.
- Whale deleveraging event suggests near-term distribution by large entities.
- Increased implied probability of a 50-basis-point rate hike.
- Long-Term Holders aggressively accumulated 177,080 BTC in the last 30 days.
Who Wins and Why
| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Below $70,000.00 | 1% | 90% | Model higher by 89.0pp |
| Below $65,000.00 | 60% | 0.9% | The aggregated evidence from macroeconomic headwinds, regulatory uncertainty, and deeply negative market sentiment provides a composite Grade D (strong negative) confirmation, shifting the initial logit of 1.696 by +1.1 to a posterior logit of 2.796, as the strongest argument remains the feedback loop between institutional ETF outflows and a tightening liquidity environment. |
| Below $60,000.00 | 33% | 49.5% | Model higher by 16.5pp |
| Below $67,500.00 | 78% | 90% | Model higher by 12.0pp |
| Below $57,500.00 | 38% | 34% | Market higher by 4.0pp |
Current Context
Bitcoin experienced a significant downturn in early February 2026, dropping below $70,000. The cryptocurrency saw a sharp sell-off, reaching approximately $69,493 - $71,150 on February 5th, marking its lowest level since November 2024 and a more than 40% decline from its all-time high of around $125,000 in October 2025. This decline is attributed to several factors including global macroeconomic headwinds and a decline in risk appetite, partly triggered by a correction in tech stocks and concerns over the "AI Trade". Further pressure comes from the perceived hawkish nomination of Kevin Warsh as the new Federal Reserve Chair, which suggests expectations of dropping liquidity and rising real rates. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s comments, stating the federal government lacks authority to buy or bail out cryptocurrencies, cooled expectations for policy support. Additionally, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded significant outflows of nearly $1.5 billion over the prior week, alongside a massive leverage unwind that triggered over $5.42 billion in liquidations since January 29, with Bitcoin alone accounting for $1.88 million.
Investors closely monitor key data points and technical indicators for market direction. Bitcoin is currently trading around $69,537.30 as of February 4th, having fallen 3.98% in 24 hours. Key support levels being watched include $72,000, $68,000 (near the 200-week Exponential Moving Average), $66,824 (November 2024 low), $60,000, and $50,000, with some analysts citing the on-chain price delta around $45,000 as macro support. Major moving averages are acting as layered resistance zones, with the 20-day EMA near $86,100, the 50-day EMA near $89,200, the 100-day EMA near $93,300, and the 200-day EMA near $97,500. Immediate upside targets upon recovery are $80,000, $95,000, and $110,000. Technical analysis shows the MACD histogram displaying a clear bearish crossover and increasing downside momentum, while the weekly RSI has fallen to levels last seen in 2022 when Bitcoin traded around $15,000, suggesting a shift towards accumulation. On-chain data indicates the Bitcoin MVRV-Z score is at 2.31, within a medium-term consolidation range, and renewed ETF inflows of $560 million were observed on February 2nd, with whale selling decreasing after profit-taking near $90,000.
Expert opinions on Bitcoin's short-term price trajectory are varied, reflecting uncertainty. Some bearish outlooks predict a continued decline, with targets as low as $68,000, $52,000, or even $45,000. LiteFinance analysis on February 5, 2026, suggested a decline to $67,428.76, and Christopher Lewis of Daily Forex believes Bitcoin will continue to fall, stating the "bottom is much lower". Prediction markets currently indicate a 62% probability of Bitcoin hitting $70,000 before reclaiming $90,000. Conversely, some experts foresee potential for recovery or consolidation; CoinDCX suggests Bitcoin could attempt to move toward the $100,000-$105,000 zone by the end of February 2026 if it reclaims major EMA levels, noting current price action reflects consolidation. Changelly forecasts a 0.91% increase to $76,812.29 by February 7, 2026, despite a bearish 13% market sentiment and an "Extreme Fear" score of 14 on the Fear & Greed Index. A short-term recovery band of $72,000-$82,000 by February 9, 2026, has also been suggested. Some analysts view the current drawdown as a "healthy risk reset" rather than a structural trend break. Despite short-term bearishness, many analysts maintain optimistic year-end 2026 predictions, targeting $100,000 to $180,000. Common concerns revolve around how low Bitcoin will get, the reasons for the current fall (e.g., "AI Trade" exhaustion, hawkish Fed Chair, Treasury Secretary's comments, ETF outflows), whether Bitcoin's four-year cycle is still relevant, and whether the current situation is a risk reset or a deeper drawdown. The ongoing macroeconomic influence of the Fed Chair nomination and the market's response to global liquidity and interest rates continue to be significant factors.
2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics
Historical Price (Probability)
Outcome probability
Date
This prediction market, which tracks the probability of Bitcoin's price falling below $65,000 in February 2026, has experienced a strong upward trend, indicating rising bearish sentiment. The contract price initiated at a 20.0% probability and has since climbed to its current level of 62.0%. The most significant price action occurred in early February, beginning with a 13.0 percentage point spike on February 2nd, driven by a market shift toward bearishness and noted institutional outflows. This was followed by a more dramatic 28.0 percentage point surge on February 4th. This larger move was a direct reaction to deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, including a correction in tech stocks and concerns over a more hawkish Federal Reserve following the nomination of a new chair, which coincided with Bitcoin itself breaking below the $70,000 level.
The market has seen significant engagement, with total volume exceeding 48,000 contracts, suggesting strong conviction behind the price discovery. The price chart shows that an early support level was established in the 20-25% range before the recent news-driven volatility. The sharp spike on February 4th decisively broke past any prior resistance, establishing a new, higher trading range above 50%. The current price of 62.0% sits near the peak of the recent run-up, acting as a potential near-term resistance level. Overall, the price action reflects a rapid and decisive shift in market sentiment. Traders have moved from viewing a drop below $65,000 as an outside possibility to considering it the probable outcome for the month, pricing in the sustained impact of negative macroeconomic headwinds on the cryptocurrency.
3. Significant Price Movements
Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.
Outcome: Below $60,000.00
📈 February 05, 2026: 14.0pp spike
Price increased from 24.0% to 38.0%
What happened: The 14.0 percentage point spike in the prediction market for "Bitcoin below $60,000.00 in February" on February 5, 2026, was primarily driven by Bitcoin's significant drop below the critical $70,000 mark, reaching lows around $69,000, its lowest point since November 2024. This downturn was largely fueled by a confluence of traditional news and market structure factors, including sustained outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, a broad risk-off sentiment across global markets impacting tech stocks, and investor concerns over President Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair, who is perceived as hawkish on monetary policy. Social media activity, such as analysts highlighting the breach of support levels and cautioning about deeper losses, largely coincided with and amplified the bearish sentiment already present in the market. Thus, social media acted as a contributing accelerant, rather than the primary driver of this particular price movement.
Outcome: Below $65,000.00
📈 February 04, 2026: 28.0pp spike
Price increased from 25.0% to 53.0%
What happened: The 28.0 percentage point spike in the "Below $65,000.00" Bitcoin prediction market on February 04, 2026, was primarily driven by a confluence of traditional news and market structure factors, rather than a specific social media event. A hawkish shift in macroeconomic sentiment, largely influenced by President Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve chair, coupled with escalating geopolitical tensions, prompted a widespread "risk-off" environment, driving investors away from speculative assets. This bearish outlook was intensified by significant market structure events, including cascading liquidations of leveraged long positions totaling over $525 million and substantial institutional outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, which recorded $545 million in net outflows on February 4. While social media commentary reflected the prevailing bearish sentiment, it did not appear to be the primary catalyst for this specific prediction market movement. Social media was: (c) mostly noise.
📈 February 02, 2026: 13.0pp spike
Price increased from 6.0% to 19.0%
What happened: The primary driver of the 13.0 percentage point spike in the "Below $65,000.00" outcome on the "How low will Bitcoin get in February?" prediction market on February 02, 2026, was a broader market shift towards extreme bearishness. This was largely influenced by significant institutional outflows from Bitcoin ETFs, including $817 million and $528 million on January 29th and 30th respectively, leading to a sharp contraction in institutional appetite. Concurrently, Bitcoin dipped below $75,000, prompting prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi to price a 72-78% chance of Bitcoin falling below $65,000, signaling a clear technical breakdown and a pervasive "extreme fear" sentiment. Social media, including a tweet from CryptoQuant's head of research advising not to "find bottoms after a new leg down," largely reflected and amplified this existing bearish sentiment rather than originating it. Therefore, social media was a contributing accelerant, but not the primary driver.
4. Market Data
Contract Snapshot
Based on the provided page content, the rules for YES/NO resolution, key dates, or special settlement conditions are not detailed. The page only presents the market question: "How low will Bitcoin get in February?"
Available Contracts
Market options and current pricing
| Outcome bucket | Yes (price) | No (price) | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Below $70,000.00 | $1.00 | $0.01 | 100% |
| Below $62,500.00 | $0.94 | $0.65 | 94% |
| Below $67,500.00 | $0.78 | $0.24 | 78% |
| Below $65,000.00 | $0.60 | $0.45 | 60% |
| Below $57,500.00 | $0.38 | $0.70 | 38% |
| Below $60,000.00 | $0.33 | $0.69 | 33% |
Market Discussion
Discussions surrounding Bitcoin's potential low in February 2026 largely indicate a bearish sentiment, with prediction markets assigning a high probability (71-74%) that the cryptocurrency will touch $70,000 during the month, with an implied range generally between $65,000 and $85,000 . Expert analyses and social media discussions point to further declines, citing factors such as strict Federal Reserve policies, significant outflows from U.S . spot Bitcoin ETFs, and geopolitical tensions, leading some to forecast lows potentially reaching $68,000, $50,000, or even $45,000 in extreme scenarios . This period is characterized by weak short-term demand, deleveraging, and widespread "extreme fear" in market sentiment, with many drawing parallels to previous bear markets .
5. Were Institutional or Retail Investors Behind Bitcoin ETF Outflows?
| Total Outflows | $1.5 billion (January 2026 ) |
|---|---|
| Institutional Outflow Volume | $1.05 Billion (70%) () |
| Retail Outflow Volume | $450 Million (30%) () |
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced significant outflows, totaling approximately $1.5 billion during the final week of January 2026. An on-chain analysis using Arkham Intelligence data indicates that both institutional and retail investors contributed to this selling pressure, though with distinct behavioral patterns. The larger portion, an estimated $1.05 billion (70%), originated from institutional investors and market makers engaging in substantial, infrequent transactions, likely for portfolio rebalancing or profit-taking.
Institutional investors drove the majority of outflows through strategic large transactions. These movements, often concentrated within U.S. market hours, included significant de-risking by some of the top 13F holders. This initial institutional selling appears to have acted as a catalyst, preceding a sharp increase in bearish market sentiment. Prediction markets subsequently showed implied probabilities of Bitcoin falling to $38,000 surging to over 60%.
Retail capitulation accounted for the remaining outflows through smaller, frequent sales. The balance of $450 million (30%) in outflows came from a broad distribution of smaller, high-frequency transactions consistent with retail capitulation. This retail-driven selling was characterized by transactions below 5 BTC, often flowing directly to centralized exchange deposit addresses, and intensified during periods of high intraday volatility or after Bitcoin's price dropped below key psychological levels. This suggests a feedback loop where institutional actions shifted market sentiment, amplifying panic among retail holders.
6. What Bitcoin Price Range Risks Major Long Liquidations in February?
| Primary Liquidation Zone | $63,000–$65,000 (Coinglass) |
|---|---|
| Key On-Chain Support (URPD) | $66,890 and $63,111 |
| Trader Leverage Behavior | Traders increasing leverage during weakness |
The largest cluster of long liquidations is concentrated between $63,000 and $65,000. This price range represents the highest notional USD value in leveraged long positions at risk of liquidation below the $68,000 support level. This zone is identified as a critical 'leverage trap,' posing the most significant bullish vulnerability on the current order book, where a cascade of forced selling could be initiated if proximate support levels fail.
This liquidation cluster is vulnerable due to proximity to key support levels. Its precariousness is amplified by its close proximity to significant on-chain support levels, specifically Unspent Realized Price Distribution (URPD) clusters located at $66,890 and $63,111. A breach of the upper URPD level would directly expose these highly leveraged positions, potentially triggering a self-reinforcing liquidation cascade. Such a downward spiral would involve initial price declines forcing market-sell orders, accelerating further depreciation and affecting even less-leveraged positions within the same price range.
Current market dynamics contrast sharply with the January 29th event. This precarious market structure, driven by traders increasing leverage during recent periods of market weakness and a noticeable lack of robust 'buy the dip' demand, differs significantly from the market event on January 29th. That previous event above $75,000 involved a short squeeze that propelled prices higher. In contrast, the current setup below $68,000 threatens a 'long squeeze,' where forced selling would exacerbate price declines, signaling bullish exhaustion and punishing excessive optimism.
7. What Bitcoin LTH Accumulation Trends Diverge from 2022 Cycle?
| Recent LTH Accumulation (30-day) | +177,080 BTC |
|---|---|
| LTH Monthly Accumulation Rate | 186,000 BTC per month |
| NVT Golden Cross (Early 2026) | -1.4357 (-135.42% decline) |
Long-Term Holders aggressively accumulated Bitcoin following Bessent's comments. Long-Term Holders (LTHs) added a net 177,080 BTC in the 30 days since January 2026, subsequent to Treasury Secretary Bessent's 'no bailout' commentary. This accumulation rate, approximately 186,000 BTC per month, suggests LTHs view current price levels as a significant discount, aligning with value-investing principles. This behavior is primarily driven by valuation metrics, as the MVRV Z-Score has reached levels last observed during the 2022 cycle bottom, indicating a market reset from previous overheating.
Current LTH accumulation patterns parallel those seen in 2022, but a key divergence exists. While current LTH accumulation patterns are comparable to the 2022 cycle bottom, which was marked by a consistent set of undervaluation signals, a critical difference has emerged in early 2026. The Network Value to Transactions (NVT) Golden Cross metric has experienced a significant decline to -1.4357, representing a precipitous -135.42% drop. This weakening in the network's valuation efficiency was not prominent during the 2022 accumulation phase and introduces a cautionary signal to the otherwise bullish LTH narrative.
Analysts should closely monitor the NVT Golden Cross for market validation. A recovery in this metric would confirm the LTH accumulation as a true generational buying opportunity, verifying the return of genuine economic activity to the chain. Conversely, continued deterioration could suggest that LTHs are accumulating into a fundamentally weaker network compared to prior cycles, potentially leading to prolonged underperformance or further price declines, as valuation cannot permanently decouple from underlying network utility.
8. How Did Kevin Warsh's Nomination Affect Bitcoin Prices?
| Pre-Nomination Rate Cut Probability | 90.1% for significant rate cut |
|---|---|
| Post-Nomination 50-bp Hike Probability | Surged to 15-25% |
| Bitcoin February Low | $70,000 on February 5, 2026 |
Warsh's nomination dramatically increased implied probability of a 50-basis-point rate hike. Before the hypothetical nomination of Kevin Warsh in February 2026, market sentiment, as indicated by the CME FedWatch Tool, largely anticipated Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, with a 90.1% probability of a significant cut and an effectively zero chance of a 50-basis-point hike. However, Warsh's nomination, perceived as a hawkish policy signal, caused an immediate and violent reversal in expectations. The implied probability of a 50-basis-point rate hike notably shifted to a tangible 15-25%, signifying a fundamental restructuring of market expectations regarding future monetary policy.
Bitcoin's price strongly correlated with altered monetary policy expectations. This dramatic repricing of monetary policy expectations directly correlated with a sharp correction in Bitcoin's price. After approaching $98,000 in January 2026, Bitcoin tested the $70,000 support level on February 5, marking its lowest point since November 2024, before a slight recovery to $71,340. This event significantly strengthened the inverse correlation between Bitcoin's price and rate hike expectations, redirecting market focus to macroeconomic discount rate factors over crypto-native drivers. Prediction markets, such as those tracking "How low will Bitcoin get in February?", mirrored this shift, rapidly updating expectations for a lower February price floor. The sell-off to $70,000 suggested participants quickly priced in the increased monetary policy risk, confirming market efficiency in processing impactful new information and aligning with macroeconomic influences.
9. How Does Whale Deleveraging Signal Bitcoin's Near-Term Price Direction?
| Annualized Stablecoin Volume | $8 trillion (late 2025-early 2026) |
|---|---|
| Whale ETH Deleveraging | $371 million (early February 2026) |
| Whale ETH to XAUT Conversion | $92.19 million (late 2025) |
Following a significant $5.42 billion market deleveraging event, large capital entities, often referred to as 'whales,' have primarily engaged in de-risking and debt repayment strategies, rather than accumulating stablecoins to 'buy the dip.' On-chain activity reveals prominent Ethereum whales moved a combined $371 million in ETH to repay DeFi loans in early February 2026. For instance, an entity identified as 'BitcoinOG' deposited $292 million in ETH to an exchange, subsequently withdrawing $92.5 million in stablecoins specifically to settle Aave debt. Another example includes crypto firm Trend Research, which deposited $79 million in ETH and used $77.5 million USDT to repay Aave debt, clearly demonstrating a concerted effort to close out leverage rather than increase stablecoin holdings.
This predominant use of stablecoins for extinguishing liabilities suggests a market structure that is becoming safer but less capitalized for an immediate rebound. This behavior contrasts sharply with expectations of aggressive dip-buying, pointing instead towards a bearish continuation or range-bound price action in the near term. Stablecoin velocity surged to an $8 trillion annualized rate in late 2025 and early 2026, driven primarily by this flight to safety and strategic deleveraging, not by new capital influx for accumulation. Further indicating deeper concerns about market stability, an Ethereum whale converted $92.19 million in ETH into XAUT, a gold-backed stablecoin, in late 2025. This collective deleveraging by sophisticated players implies an anticipation of further market downside or, at minimum, a period where leverage costs outweigh potential upside, suggesting weakened bid-side liquidity for Bitcoin and a speculative forecast of lower or volatile consolidation for its price in February.
10. What Could Change the Odds
Key Catalysts
Key bullish catalysts for Bitcoin include sustained institutional inflows, which by late 2025 had driven over $130 billion into Bitcoin ETPs/ETFs, with 86% of institutions allocating to crypto. Positive regulatory developments, such as the advancement of the U.S. CLARITY Act by the Senate Agriculture Committee, could provide increased certainty. Furthermore, a weakening U.S. dollar or renewed inflation concerns could bolster Bitcoin's appeal as a digital gold, while successful industry events like the Digital Assets Forum, Consensus Hong Kong, and ETHDenver in February could generate positive sentiment. Technically, the $75,000-$80,000 range has been identified as a potential cycle bottom, with a hold above $75,000 possibly leading to a rise towards $80,000.
Conversely, several bearish factors could exert downward pressure. Macroeconomic headwinds, including a strong U.S. dollar fueled by early 2026 employment data, often lead to a 'risk-off' sentiment for assets like Bitcoin. Persistent regulatory uncertainty, such as bipartisan legislative splits or warnings from bodies like Australian ASIC, alongside expected increased compliance costs for crypto firms, could dampen sentiment. Large-scale liquidations, like the 'massive leverage unwind' seen in late January and early February, pose a continued risk. Moreover, a lack of significant 'whale' accumulation or a decisive technical breakdown below the $75,000 support level could signal further declines, with some analyses pointing towards $67,428.76 or even $60,000. The partial U.S. government shutdown, which commenced on January 31 and canceled key labor market data for February 6, also contributes to market uncertainty.
Key Dates & Catalysts
- Expiration: March 08, 2026
- Closes: March 01, 2026
11. Decision-Flipping Events
- Trigger: Key bullish catalysts for Bitcoin include sustained institutional inflows, which by late 2025 had driven over $130 billion into Bitcoin ETPs/ETFs, with 86% of institutions allocating to crypto [^] .
- Trigger: Positive regulatory developments, such as the advancement of the U.S.
- Trigger: CLARITY Act by the Senate Agriculture Committee, could provide increased certainty [^] .
- Trigger: Furthermore, a weakening U.S.
13. Historical Resolutions
Historical Resolutions: 11 markets in this series
Outcomes: 11 resolved YES, 0 resolved NO
Recent resolutions:
- KXBTCMINMON-BTC-26FEB28-7500000: YES (Feb 02, 2026)
- KXBTCMINMON-BTC-26FEB28-7250000: YES (Feb 04, 2026)
- KXBTCMINMON-BTC-26FEB28-7000000: YES (Feb 05, 2026)
- KXBTCMINMON-BTC-26JAN31-95000: YES (Jan 16, 2026)
- KXBTCMINMON-BTC-26JAN31-92500: YES (Jan 19, 2026)
Get Real-Time Research Updates
Sign up for early access to live reports, historical data, and AI-powered market insights delivered to your inbox.
