# Charles Schwab Challenge: Top 20 Finishers

2026 Charles Schwab Challenge

Updated: May 30, 2026

Category: Sports

Tags: Golf

HTML: /markets/sports/golf/charles-schwab-challenge-top-20-finishers/

## Short Answer

**Key takeaway.** Both the **model** and the **market** expect Hideki Matsuyama to be a Top 20 finisher at the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.

## Key Claims (January 2026)

**- Warm, breezy, dry weather will create a firm, challenging final course.** Pre-tournament favorite Ludvig Aberg shows a positive trajectory, making the cut.
   Hideki Matsuyama excels with strong play, currently tied for second place.
   Jordan Smith's past success suggests he may maintain his one-shot lead.
   A.J. Ewart exhibited significantly stronger form through 36 holes.
   The 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge is a significant event driving **market** probabilities.

### Why This Matters (GEO)

- AI agents extract claims, not arguments.
- Improves citation probability in summaries and answer cards.
- Enables fact stitching across multiple sources.

## Executive Verdict

**Key takeaway.** **Market** prices higher at 42c (**29.2%** **model**), a 12.8pp gap, with payout multiple 2.4x if **model** correct.

### Who Wins and Why

| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lanto Griffin | 4.0% | 1.4% | Research does not highlight strong supporting evidence. |
| Patrick Fishburn | 4.0% | 1.4% | Research does not highlight strong supporting evidence. |
| Ludvig Aberg | 67.0% | 57.7% | Ludvig Aberg is considered a strong contender for a top 20 finish. |

## Model vs Market

| Outcome | Market Probability | Octagon Model Probability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lanto Griffin | 4.0% | 1.4% |
| Patrick Fishburn | 4.0% | 1.4% |
| Ludvig Aberg | 67.0% | 57.7% |
| Justin Thomas | 41.0% | 28.2% |
| Russell Henley | 83.0% | 78.0% |
| Akshay Bhatia | 73.0% | 65.2% |
| Pierceson Coody | 15.0% | 5.1% |
| Hideki Matsuyama | 83.0% | 78.0% |
| Brian Harman | 79.0% | 72.8% |
| Christiaan Bezuidenhout | 33.0% | 20.6% |
| Keegan Bradley | 50.0% | 37.7% |
| Alex Smalley | 74.0% | 66.4% |
| Tom Hoge | 30.0% | 18.0% |
| J.J. Spaun | 76.0% | 69.0% |
| Emiliano Grillo | 23.0% | 12.3% |
| Luke Clanton | 19.0% | 9.5% |
| Mac Meissner | 59.0% | 48.0% |
| Ryo Hisatsune | 54.0% | 42.2% |
| Gary Woodland | 51.0% | 38.8% |
| Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen | 39.0% | 26.2% |
| Tom Kim | 29.0% | 17.1% |
| Ben Griffin | 36.0% | 23.4% |
| Davis Riley | 7.0% | 2.7% |
| Nicolas Echavarria | 14.0% | 6.3% |
| Eric Cole | 35.0% | 22.4% |
| John Keefer | 10.0% | 4.1% |
| Garrick Higgo | 34.0% | 21.5% |
| Doug Ghim | 46.0% | 33.4% |
| Robert MacIntyre | 34.0% | 21.5% |
| A.J. Ewart | 42.0% | 29.2% |
| Matthew McCarty | 35.0% | 22.4% |
| Michael Thorbjornsen | 75.0% | 67.7% |
| Austin Eckroat | 44.0% | 31.3% |
| Adam Schenk | 6.0% | 2.2% |
| Max Homa | 16.0% | 7.5% |
| Rico Hoey | 17.0% | 8.2% |
| Sahith Theegala | 20.0% | 10.2% |
| Steven Fisk | 15.0% | 6.9% |
| Andrew Putnam | 47.0% | 34.5% |
| Taylor Moore | 18.0% | 8.8% |
| Nick Dunlap | 10.0% | 4.1% |
| Andrew Novak | 48.0% | 35.5% |
| Seamus Power | 13.0% | 5.7% |
| Sam Stevens | 10.0% | 4.1% |
| Michael Brennan | 48.0% | 35.5% |
| Erik Van Rooyen | 8.0% | 3.1% |
| Michael Kim | 18.0% | 8.8% |
| Jackson Suber | 9.0% | 3.6% |
| Lucas Glover | 8.0% | 3.1% |
| Mackenzie Hughes | 42.0% | 29.2% |
| Joel Dahmen | 21.0% | 10.9% |
| Ryan Gerard | 76.0% | 69.0% |
| Kevin Roy | 12.0% | 5.2% |
| Brandt Snedeker | 9.0% | 3.6% |
| Matt Kuchar | 24.0% | 13.1% |
| Thorbjorn Olesen | 25.0% | 13.9% |
| Ricky Castillo | 41.0% | 28.2% |
| Lee Hodges | 26.0% | 14.7% |
| Zachary Bauchou | 18.0% | 8.8% |
| J.T. Poston | 26.0% | 14.7% |
| Keita Nakajima | 26.0% | 14.7% |
| Austin Smotherman | 20.0% | 10.2% |
| Billy Horschel | 19.0% | 9.5% |
| Kevin Streelman | 8.0% | 3.1% |
| Max McGreevy | 14.0% | 6.3% |
| Brice Garnett | 48.0% | 35.5% |
| Mark Hubbard | 12.0% | 5.2% |
| Davis Thompson | 33.0% | 20.6% |
| Jordan L. Smith | 81.0% | 75.4% |
| Chandler Blanchet | 16.0% | 7.5% |
| Adrien Saddier | 16.0% | 7.5% |
| Kevin Yu | 25.0% | 13.9% |
| Takumi Kanaya | 11.0% | 4.6% |
| Patrick Rodgers | 20.0% | 10.2% |
| Jeffrey Kang | 5.0% | 1.8% |

- Expiration: June 28, 2026

## Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

This prediction market has experienced a significant upward trend, with the probability of a top-20 finish rising from a starting point of 9.0% to a current price of 42.0%. The most dramatic price movement was a 32.0 percentage point spike on May 29, 2026, which saw the price jump from 13.0% to 45.0%. This surge appears to be a direct reaction to Michael Brennan's strong second-round performance in the tournament, where a score of 66 moved him into a tie for 11th place, substantially improving his perceived chances. The overall price range has been wide, moving between 9.0% and a high of 78.0%, indicating significant volatility and trader reaction to tournament developments.

The total trading volume of 8,314 contracts suggests active participation and strong conviction among market participants. The chart established an early support level around the 9.0% to 13.0% range before the breakout. The peak of 78.0% now stands as a key resistance level, as the price has since retreated. The current price of 42.0% is near the 45.0% level reached during the May 29 spike, potentially forming a new area of consolidation. Overall, the price action reflects a sharp increase in positive market sentiment, driven by on-course performance, although the pullback from the peak suggests some traders believe the probability was overextended or are taking profits.

## Significant Price Movements

### Outcome: Luke Clanton

#### 📉 May 30, 2026: 19.0pp drop

Price decreased from 38.0% to 19.0%

**What happened:** Based on the provided information, the primary driver for Luke Clanton's prediction market price drop on May 30, 2026, cannot be identified. The available sources confirm the Charles Schwab Challenge 2026 is in progress [[^]](https://www.foxsports.com/golf/leaderboard?tab=leaderboard), with Luke Clanton participating [[^]](https://www.flashscoreusa.com/golf/pga-tour/charles-schwab-challenge/), but provide no details regarding his performance on that specific day, nor any social media activity, traditional news, or market structure factors related to the movement. Without any specific posts, news reports, or trading data from May 30, 2026, the influence of social media cannot be assessed.

### Outcome: Michael Brennan

#### 📈 May 29, 2026: 35.0pp spike

Price increased from 20.0% to 55.0%

**What happened:** The primary driver of the prediction market price movement was Michael Brennan's strong performance during the second round of the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge. He recorded a round of 66, bringing him to 7-under par and moving him into a tie for 11th place, significantly increasing his odds for a "Top 20 Finish" [[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949)[[^]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGLVAjaFqkw). His notable plays included a 24-foot birdie putt and an up-and-down from 97 yards for birdie [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/video/competition/6396958023112/michael-brennan-sinks-a-foot-birdie-putt-on-no--at-charles-schwab)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/video/competition/6396959457112/michael-brennan-gets-upanddown-from--yards-for-birdie-on-no--at-charles-schwab). Based on the provided information, social media activity was not evidenced as a primary driver, and the price spike appears directly linked to his improved tournament standing.

### Outcome: Brian Harman

#### 📈 May 28, 2026: 22.0pp spike

Price increased from 29.0% to 51.0%

**What happened:** The primary driver of the price movement was Brian Harman's exceptional performance in the opening round of the Charles Schwab Challenge on May 28, 2026. Harman shot a bogey-free 65 (5-under), placing him high on the leaderboard, which directly indicated a strong likelihood of a Top 20 finish [[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949)[[^]](https://www.foxsports.com/golf/scorecard?id=4825&player=brian-harman)[[^]](https://www.dailyclubgolf.com/news/nothing-crazy-brian-harman-shoots-bogey-free-sixty-five-and-shares-honest-feelings-playing-in-texas/). This performance coincided with significant positive traditional media coverage and the PGA Tour media publishing multiple video clips showcasing his impressive shots on May 28, 2026, which acted as a catalyst for increased social media visibility [[^]](https://www.hitc.com/keegan-bradley-opens-up-on-how-he-found-playing-with-brian-harman-on-day-one-of-the-charles-schwab/)[[^]](https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/keegan-bradley-opens-found-playing-195601447.html)[[^]](https://margaretriverfestival.com/article/keegan-bradley-and-brian-harman-s-impressive-day-1-at-the-charles-schwab-challenge)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/video/competition/6396856834112/brian-harmans-yard-bunker-shot-sets-up-birdie-on-no--at-charles-schwab)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/video/competition/6396855498112/brian-harman-hits-tee-shot-to--feet-sets-up-birdie-on-no--at-charles-schwab)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/video/competition/6396980883112/brian-harmans-yard-approach-sets-up-birdie-on-no--at-charles-schwab). Therefore, social media was a contributing accelerant, amplifying the real-time impact of Harman's strong play.

#### 📈 May 25, 2026: 13.0pp spike

Price increased from 22.0% to 35.0%

**What happened:** The primary driver for the 13.0 percentage point spike in Brian Harman's "Top 20 Finishers" market on May 25, 2026, cannot be identified from the available information. There is no evidence of a social media spike or specific catalyst for Brian Harman on that date [[^]](https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/fans-turn-pga-tour-pro-202504006.html). Instead, online discourse around May 25, 2026, focused on reactions to PGA Tour pro Michael Kim defending Wyndham Clark [[^]](https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/fans-turn-pga-tour-pro-202504006.html). Therefore, social media activity was irrelevant to this particular price movement.

## Contract Snapshot

This market resolves to "Yes" if Jordan L. Smith finishes in the top 20 (including ties) in the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge. It resolves to "No" if he forfeits, withdraws, or doesn't participate after teeing off; if this occurs prior to teeing off, it resolves to Fair Market Price. The market opened on May 25, 2026, at 4:10 PM EDT, closes after the event outcome (or by June 27, 2026, at 8:00 PM EDT), with payout projected 5 minutes after closing, based on sources like Fox Sports, ESPN, and the PGA Tour.

## Market Discussion

As of May 30, 2026, Jordan Smith leads the Charles Schwab Challenge at -10, with Michael Thorbjornsen, Hideki Matsuyama, Brian Harman, and Ryan Gerard tied for second at -9 [[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949). Heading into the weekend, Ludvig Aberg was widely identified as the tournament favorite, while Justin Thomas, Robert MacIntyre, and Rickie Fowler were popular targets for top-20 betting discussions [[^]](https://bettorsinsider.com/golf/2026/05/29/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-betting-preview-odds-picks-and-best-bets-at-colonial-country-club/). Prediction markets were actively facilitating trading on the tournament, with social media commentary highlighting the competitive "battle"-like nature of the weekend field, and a computer model specifically identified Akshay Bhatia as a strong contender for a top finish [[^]](https://www.fantasyalarm.com/articles/promotions/kalshi-promo-code-charles-schwab-challenge-alarm-gets-10-free/190619).

## Market Data

| Contract | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | Last Price | Volume | Open Interest |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Akshay Bhatia | 71% | 73% | 73% | $54,870.94 | $46,701.32 |
| Austin Eckroat | 14% | 15% | 44% | $7,612.74 | $7,583.74 |
| A.J. Ewart | 41% | 42% | 42% | $8,314.45 | $8,313.45 |
| Andrew Novak | 46% | 47% | 48% | $5,383.25 | $5,097.4 |
| Andrew Putnam | 46% | 47% | 47% | $5,891.96 | $4,655.79 |
| Adrien Saddier | 17% | 19% | 16% | $859 | $859 |
| Adam Schenk | 5% | 6% | 6% | $7,222.24 | $6,797.58 |
| Alex Smalley | 72% | 73% | 74% | $26,596.17 | $24,232.33 |
| Austin Smotherman | 20% | 21% | 20% | $1,845.86 | $1,641.19 |
| Brice Garnett | 46% | 47% | 48% | $1,401.55 | $1,371.55 |
| Ben Griffin | 35% | 36% | 36% | $11,951.76 | $10,486.52 |
| Brian Harman | 79% | 80% | 79% | $27,385.57 | $26,807.52 |
| Billy Horschel | 18% | 19% | 19% | $1,774.42 | $1,738.42 |
| Brandt Snedeker | 8% | 10% | 9% | $2,817.32 | $2,591.32 |
| Christiaan Bezuidenhout | 32% | 33% | 33% | $27,248.58 | $26,669.62 |
| Chandler Blanchet | 18% | 20% | 16% | $1,021 | $1,011 |
| Doug Ghim | 45% | 46% | 46% | $8,535.13 | $8,405.96 |
| Davis Riley | 6% | 7% | 7% | $11,586.98 | $10,495.29 |
| Davis Thompson | 27% | 28% | 33% | $1,219.99 | $1,219.99 |
| Eric Cole | 34% | 35% | 35% | $10,495.62 | $10,303.62 |
| Emiliano Grillo | 23% | 25% | 23% | $18,878.15 | $18,503.15 |
| Erik Van Rooyen | 8% | 10% | 8% | $5,006.14 | $4,719.53 |
| Garrick Higgo | 32% | 33% | 34% | $9,429.24 | $9,400.56 |
| Gary Woodland | 49% | 50% | 51% | $14,221.23 | $13,791.77 |
| Hideki Matsuyama | 82% | 83% | 83% | $29,455.01 | $27,175.67 |
| Joel Dahmen | 20% | 21% | 21% | $3,723.08 | $3,711.08 |
| Jeffrey Kang | 6% | 7% | 5% | $152 | $152 |
| John Keefer | 7% | 10% | 10% | $9,808.23 | $8,898.11 |
| J.T. Poston | 26% | 28% | 26% | $2,094.25 | $1,900.25 |
| Jordan L. Smith | 79% | 81% | 81% | $1,152.97 | $737.97 |
| J.J. Spaun | 76% | 77% | 76% | $23,261.94 | $20,436.28 |
| Jackson Suber | 7% | 9% | 9% | $4,386.46 | $4,346.46 |
| Justin Thomas | 40% | 42% | 41% | $59,803.7 | $46,664.81 |
| Keegan Bradley | 49% | 50% | 50% | $26,834.11 | $25,929.75 |
| Keita Nakajima | 24% | 26% | 26% | $1,900.59 | $1,900.59 |
| Kevin Roy | 11% | 12% | 12% | $3,050.94 | $3,013.94 |
| Kevin Streelman | 6% | 8% | 8% | $1,757.87 | $1,741.38 |
| Kevin Yu | 24% | 26% | 25% | $670.76 | $645.76 |
| Ludvig Aberg | 67% | 68% | 67% | $107,888.56 | $96,305.13 |
| Lanto Griffin | 4% | 5% | 4% | $412.5 | $365 |
| Luke Clanton | 17% | 19% | 19% | $15,522.2 | $14,275.6 |
| Lucas Glover | 8% | 10% | 8% | $3,942.39 | $3,927.39 |
| Lee Hodges | 26% | 28% | 26% | $2,200.54 | $1,764.54 |
| Michael Brennan | 46% | 47% | 48% | $5,069.01 | $5,068.01 |
| Max Homa | 14% | 16% | 16% | $7,103.55 | $6,818.91 |
| Mark Hubbard | 12% | 14% | 12% | $1,328.92 | $1,282.22 |
| Mackenzie Hughes | 41% | 43% | 42% | $3,809.61 | $3,679.26 |
| Michael Kim | 15% | 17% | 18% | $4,778.77 | $4,383.77 |
| Matt Kuchar | 23% | 25% | 24% | $2,759.64 | $2,759.64 |
| Matthew McCarty | 36% | 37% | 35% | $7,997.94 | $7,526.94 |
| Max McGreevy | 15% | 16% | 14% | $1,724.91 | $1,665.91 |
| Mac Meissner | 57% | 58% | 59% | $15,202.12 | $13,422.94 |
| Michael Thorbjornsen | 74% | 75% | 75% | $7,815.04 | $5,390.23 |
| Nick Dunlap | 9% | 11% | 10% | $5,434.54 | $5,434.54 |
| Nicolas Echavarria | 9% | 13% | 14% | $10,976 | $9,306.9 |
| Pierceson Coody | 13% | 15% | 15% | $54,674.93 | $50,432.51 |
| Patrick Fishburn | 4% | 8% | 4% | $236.99 | $226.99 |
| Patrick Rodgers | 9% | 11% | 20% | $409.9 | $409.9 |
| Ricky Castillo | 40% | 41% | 41% | $2,381.17 | $2,361.17 |
| Ryan Gerard | 73% | 75% | 76% | $3,189.12 | $2,347.05 |
| Russell Henley | 81% | 83% | 83% | $55,163.33 | $51,134.12 |
| Ryo Hisatsune | 52% | 53% | 54% | $14,405.97 | $13,302.68 |
| Rico Hoey | 16% | 17% | 17% | $6,377.09 | $5,012.09 |
| Robert MacIntyre | 32% | 34% | 34% | $8,451.09 | $8,335.65 |
| Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen | 40% | 41% | 39% | $13,901.44 | $13,782.44 |
| Steven Fisk | 14% | 15% | 15% | $6,129.36 | $6,056.36 |
| Seamus Power | 7% | 9% | 13% | $5,274.66 | $5,274.66 |
| Sam Stevens | 10% | 12% | 10% | $5,191.04 | $5,176.04 |
| Sahith Theegala | 19% | 21% | 20% | $6,279.41 | $5,754.12 |
| Tom Hoge | 29% | 30% | 30% | $24,256.81 | $22,782.6 |
| Takumi Kanaya | 5% | 7% | 11% | $667.49 | $667.49 |
| Tom Kim | 27% | 29% | 29% | $12,480.49 | $11,814.55 |
| Taylor Moore | 14% | 16% | 18% | $5,451.79 | $5,090.7 |
| Thorbjorn Olesen | 23% | 25% | 25% | $2,618.94 | $2,366.18 |
| Zachary Bauchou | 16% | 18% | 18% | $2,173.58 | $2,168.58 |

## How might course conditions and weather forecasts for the final rounds on May 30-31, 2026, impact players near the top-20 cutline?

Expected Weather Conditions | Warm, breezy, and dry (May 30-31) [[^]](https://datagolf.com/live-model/pga-tour) |
Wind Speed | 5-15 mph (South and Southwest) [[^]](https://datagolf.com/live-model/pga-tour) |
Course Firmness | Firm and fast, due to no precipitation [[^]](https://www.ausgolf.com.au/the-influence-of-course-and-weather-conditions-on-golf-tournament-outcomes)[[^]](https://splashsports.com/blog/course-conditions-their-impact-on-player-performance-at-the-masters)[[^]](https://datagolf.com/live-model/pga-tour) |

**Warm, breezy, dry weather will create a firm, challenging course**

Warm, breezy, dry weather will create a firm, challenging course. For the final rounds of the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge on May 30-31, conditions are expected to be warm, breezy, and dry [[^]](https://datagolf.com/live-**model**/pga-tour). These conditions are projected to result in a firm and fast course [[^]](https://www.ausgolf.com.au/the-influence-of-course-and-weather-conditions-on-golf-tournament-outcomes)[[^]](https://splashsports.com/blog/course-conditions-their-impact-on-player-performance-at-the-masters), which has historically played tougher than the PGA Tour average, particularly under firm and windy conditions [[^]](https://rickrungood.com/andys-course-breakdown-everything-you-need-to-know-about-colonial/)[[^]](https://www.golfpass.com/travel-advisor/courses/15181-colonial-country-club)[[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_Country_Club_(Fort_Worth))[[^]](https://www.golfcoursegurus.com/reviews/colonial-country-club/). While average highs in the mid-80s may slightly increase golf ball travel distance due to less dense air [[^]](https://weatherspark.com/m/8105/5/Average-Weather-in-May-in-Fort-Worth-United-States)[[^]](https://wanderlog.com/weather/58212/5/fort-worth-weather-in-may)[[^]](https://www.worldweatheronline.com/fort-worth-weather-averages-may/texas/us.aspx)[[^]](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10589173/)[[^]](https://theclubac.com/blog/golf/best-golf-weather/), the forecasted 5-15 mph winds, primarily from the South and Southwest, will significantly influence play [[^]](https://datagolf.com/live-**model**/pga-tour). Wind, even at moderate speeds, impacts ball trajectory, shot distance, and club selection [[^]](https://www.ausgolf.com.au/the-influence-of-course-and-weather-conditions-on-golf-tournament-outcomes)[[^]](https://www.wcnc.com/article/weather/weather-iq/how-weather-impacts-golf-game-learn-tips-strategy/275-e254f5d8-4649-408e-88bb-7b7975f884de)[[^]](https://theclubac.com/blog/golf/best-golf-weather/)[[^]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA6EutEXLLw), potentially making critical stretches like the "Horrible Horseshoe" (holes 3-5) even more challenging [[^]](https://rickrungood.com/andys-course-breakdown-everything-you-need-to-know-about-colonial/)[[^]](https://www.top100golfcourses.com/golf-course/colonial). No precipitation is anticipated for these final rounds [[^]](https://datagolf.com/live-**model**/pga-tour).

Firm, fast conditions demand precision and strategic course management skills. With no rain anticipated, the course is expected to play firm and fast [[^]](https://www.ausgolf.com.au/the-influence-of-course-and-weather-conditions-on-golf-tournament-outcomes)[[^]](https://splashsports.com/blog/course-conditions-their-impact-on-player-performance-at-the-masters), rewarding precise ball striking, strategic course management, and a sharp short game [[^]](https://www.ausgolf.com.au/the-influence-of-course-and-weather-conditions-on-golf-tournament-outcomes)[[^]](https://splashsports.com/blog/course-conditions-their-impact-on-player-performance-at-the-masters). Firm greens, despite Colonial's generally benign putting surfaces, will necessitate more accurate approach shots and nuanced putting, as balls may run out further [[^]](https://rickrungood.com/andys-course-breakdown-everything-you-need-to-know-about-colonial/)[[^]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1BQB_saE3I). Colonial's design features challenging par-3s and "gettable" par-4s [[^]](https://rickrungood.com/andys-course-breakdown-everything-you-need-to-know-about-colonial/). A recent 2024 renovation, which included re-grassing and advanced irrigation and cooling systems for the greens, suggests the course will be meticulously maintained [[^]](https://www.top100golfcourses.com/golf-course/colonial).

## Based on live data from May 30, what is the performance trajectory for pre-tournament favorites Ludvig Aberg and Keegan Bradley?

Ludvig Aberg Status | Made the cut (Charles Schwab Challenge, May 30, 2026) [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021/leaderboard)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949) |
Ludvig Aberg Score | -6 (66-68) [[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949) |
Keegan Bradley Status | Missed the cut (Charles Schwab Challenge, May 30, 2026) [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021/leaderboard)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949) |

**As of May 30, 2026, Ludvig Aberg shows a positive trajectory, making the Charles Schwab cut**

As of May 30, 2026, Ludvig Aberg shows a positive trajectory, making the Charles Schwab cut. The pre-tournament favorite successfully advanced to the weekend rounds at the Charles Schwab Challenge, shooting rounds of 66 and 68 for a total score of -6 [[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949). This performance places him in contention for a top 20 finish, significantly above the tournament's cut line of -2 [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021/leaderboard)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949).

In contrast, Keegan Bradley missed the cut, ending his tournament early. Bradley, also considered a notable player before the event, shot rounds of 71 and 68, accumulating a total score of -1 [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021/leaderboard)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949). This score fell short of the -2 cut line, concluding his performance trajectory at the Charles Schwab Challenge [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021/leaderboard)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949).

## How do Hideki Matsuyama and J.J. Spaun compare in key performance metrics at Colonial Country Club for the 2026 tournament?

Hideki Matsuyama Standing | Tied for 2nd place at 9-under par (66-65=131) [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021)[[^]](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/leaderboard/pga-tour/31000094/charles-schwab-challenge/recap/)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/article/news/latest/2026/05/29/round-2-charles-schwab-challenge-colonial-country-club-scores-leaderboard-results-cutline-tony-finau)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949) |
J.J. Spaun Standing | Tied for 6th place at 8-under par (64-68=132) [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021)[[^]](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/leaderboard/pga-tour/31000094/charles-schwab-challenge/recap/)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/article/news/latest/2026/05/29/round-2-charles-schwab-challenge-colonial-country-club-scores-leaderboard-results-cutline-tony-finau)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949) |
Spaun's Performance Key | Putter change [[^]](https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/j-j-spaun-contending-colonial-010739371.html)[[^]](https://www.tsn.ca/golf/article/spaun-two-back-at-colonial-believing-things-are-aligning-for-us-open-defence/) |

**Hideki Matsuyama excels with strong play at Colonial Country Club**

Hideki Matsuyama excels with strong play at Colonial Country Club. Matsuyama is currently tied for second place at the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge, standing at 9-under par with rounds of 66 and 65 for a total of 131 after Round 2 at Colonial Country Club [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021). His strong showing is attributed to exceptional approach play, complemented by a precise short game and effective putting [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021)[[^]](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/leaderboard/pga-tour/31000094/charles-schwab-challenge/recap/)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/article/news/latest/2026/05/29/round-2-charles-schwab-challenge-colonial-country-club-scores-leaderboard-results-cutline-tony-finau)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949)[[^]](https://srivax.com/2026-charles-schwab-challenge-leaderboard-hideki-matsuyama-in-the-hunt-after-round-2/).

J.J. Spaun's putter change has improved his tournament standing. Spaun, the reigning U.S. Open champion, is positioned in a tie for sixth place at 8-under par (64-68=132) at the same tournament [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021). He has credited his enhanced performance during the Charles Schwab Challenge to a recent putter change, a decision he made following difficulties experienced earlier in the 2026 season [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021)[[^]](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/leaderboard/pga-tour/31000094/charles-schwab-challenge/recap/)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/article/news/latest/2026/05/29/round-2-charles-schwab-challenge-colonial-country-club-scores-leaderboard-results-cutline-tony-finau)[[^]](https://www.espn.com/golf/leaderboard/_/tournamentId/401811949)[[^]](https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/j-j-spaun-contending-colonial-010739371.html)[[^]](https://www.tsn.ca/golf/article/spaun-two-back-at-colonial-believing-things-are-aligning-for-us-open-defence/).

## What does Jordan Smith's historical performance in final rounds suggest about his ability to maintain his lead at the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge?

Current Lead | One-shot lead at 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge after 36 holes [[^]](https://fieldlevelmedia.com/pga_tour/jordan-smith-claims-1-shot-lead-at-charles-schwab-challenge/)[[^]](https://thescore.com/pga/news/3547723/amp)[[^]](https://www.yardbarker.com/golf/articles/pga_tour_rookie_jordan_smith_takes_colonial_lead_with_familiar_formula/s1_17615_43897960) |
Portugal Masters 2022 Win Margin | Won by three strokes after starting with a two-shot lead and carding 63 (eight-under-par) [[^]](https://gulfnews.com/sport/golf-in-uae/world/englishman-jordan-smith-wins-portugal-masters-on-dp-world-tour-1.91615565)[[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Smith_(golfer))[[^]](https://www.where2golf.com/golf-tournaments/results/player/smith-jordan/) |
PGA Tour Final Round Average | 67.63 over eight rounds or 68.00 over nine rounds [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/player/46464/jordan-smith/stats?deviceId=5a3ccfaa-3633-478d-a6a4-70f835398740)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/player/46464/jordan-smith/stats?deviceId=a0f79bea-cedf-4a71-848c-9d9e41d826a9) |

**Jordan Smith's first PGA Tour 36-hole lead comes with past success**

Jordan Smith's first PGA Tour 36-hole lead comes with past success. Smith currently holds a one-shot lead at the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge after 36 holes, marking his initial experience with a halfway lead on the PGA Tour [[^]](https://fieldlevelmedia.com/pga_tour/jordan-smith-claims-1-shot-lead-at-charles-schwab-challenge/)[[^]](https://thescore.com/pga/news/3547723/amp)[[^]](https://www.yardbarker.com/golf/articles/pga_tour_rookie_jordan_smith_takes_colonial_lead_with_familiar_formula/s1_17615_43897960). His previous experience converting leads on the DP World Tour offers encouraging signs for his ability to maintain this position [[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/)[[^]](https://fieldlevelmedia.com/pga_tour/jordan-smith-claims-1-shot-lead-at-charles-schwab-challenge/)[[^]](https://thescore.com/pga/news/3547723/amp)[[^]](https://www.yardbarker.com/golf/articles/pga_tour_rookie_jordan_smith_takes_colonial_lead_with_familiar_formula/s1_17615_43897960). Notably, in 2022, Smith achieved a wire-to-wire victory at the Portugal Masters, where he began the final round with a two-shot advantage and posted an impressive eight-under-par 63 to win by three strokes [[^]](https://gulfnews.com/sport/golf-in-uae/world/englishman-jordan-smith-wins-portugal-masters-on-dp-world-tour-1.91615565)[[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Smith_(golfer))[[^]](https://www.where2golf.com/golf-tournaments/results/player/smith-jordan/). He also secured his first European Tour title at the 2017 Porsche European Open, though that particular win was decided in a playoff [[^]](https://www.europeantour.com/players/jordan-smith-38857/stats)[[^]](https://www.europeantour.com/players/jordan-smith-38857/)[[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Smith_(golfer))[[^]](https://www.where2golf.com/golf-tournaments/results/player/smith-jordan/).

Smith's current form and PGA Tour stats indicate strong potential. He presently leads the field in driving accuracy and has demonstrated robust scrambling abilities [[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/)[[^]](https://www.yardbarker.com/golf/articles/pga_tour_rookie_jordan_smith_takes_colonial_lead_with_familiar_formula/s1_17615_43897960). Smith himself recognizes that leading a PGA Tour event is a "new experience" for him, expressing his intent to "stick to what I've been doing" and to "enjoy it" [[^]](https://fieldlevelmedia.com/pga_tour/jordan-smith-claims-1-shot-lead-at-charles-schwab-challenge/)[[^]](https://thescore.com/pga/news/3547723/amp). His PGA Tour statistics show a solid final round scoring average, recorded as 67.63 over eight rounds or 68.00 over nine rounds [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/player/46464/jordan-smith/stats?deviceId=5a3ccfaa-3633-478d-a6a4-70f835398740)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/player/46464/jordan-smith/stats?deviceId=a0f79bea-cedf-4a71-848c-9d9e41d826a9). Additionally, he showcased his ability to perform well in a final round at the 2017 PGA Championship, where his round of 68 propelled him 17 places up the leaderboard into a tie for ninth [[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/)[[^]](https://www.nationalclubgolfer.com/tour/pga-championship/jordan-smith-last-hole-2017-pga-championship-bugs-me/).

## Comparing their performance through 36 holes, who has shown stronger form at the 2026 event: A.J. Ewart or Hayden Springer?

A.J. Ewart Tournament Position | Tied for 11th place (7-under par) [[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/article/news/betting-profile/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/hayden-springer-pga-tour-betting-stats-charles-schwab-challenge-2026) |
A.J. Ewart Second Round Score | 7-under 63 (included a hole-in-one) [[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/)[[^]](https://www.golfbettingsystem.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-tips-2026/) |
Hayden Springer Tournament Score | 2-over par (total 142), missed the cut [[^]](https://www.pga.com/events/leaderboards/pga-tour?utm_campaign=redirect&utm_medium=301)[[^]](https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/golf/pga/leaderboard/5008426)[[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/) |

**A.J**

A.J. Ewart exhibited significantly stronger form through 36 holes at the 2026 event compared to Hayden Springer. Ewart concluded the first two rounds tied for 11th place with a score of 7-under par [[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/)[[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/article/news/betting-profile/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/hayden-springer-pga-tour-betting-stats-charles-schwab-challenge-2026). His second round was particularly notable, as it included a hole-in-one and a score of 7-under 63 [[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/)[[^]](https://www.golfbettingsystem.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-tips-2026/).

Hayden Springer struggled, missing the cut at 2-over par. He finished the 36 holes at 2-over par, having recorded consecutive rounds of 71 for a total of 142 strokes [[^]](https://www.pga.com/events/leaderboards/pga-tour?utm_campaign=redirect&utm_medium=301)[[^]](https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/golf/pga/leaderboard/5008426)[[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/). This performance resulted in Springer missing the cut for the event [[^]](https://www.pga.com/events/leaderboards/pga-tour?utm_campaign=redirect&utm_medium=301)[[^]](https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/golf/pga/leaderboard/5008426)[[^]](https://golftoday.co.uk/charles-schwab-challenge-2026-r2-jordan-smith-takes-36-hole-lead/).

## What Could Change the Odds

**Prediction market odds for golf events update continuously as new information and data arrive [[^]](https://polymarket.com/sports/golf).** Specifically, golf markets are driven by news, scheduled events, deadlines, and other information that shifts trader sentiment [[^]](https://polymarket.com/sports/golf).

**The 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge, scheduled to run from May 28–31, 2026, represents a significant scheduled event that will influence market probabilities [[^]](https://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/2026/charles-schwab-challenge/R2026021/overview)[[^]](https://www.charlesschwabchallenge.com/schedule).** Before the tournament, on May 27, 2026, the Top 20 Finishers **market** showed Ludvig Åberg with the highest-priced listed option at 59¢, while J.J. Spaun and Rickie Fowler had lower-priced options at 40¢ and 42¢, respectively [[^]](https://robinhood.com/us/en/prediction-markets/golf/events/charles-schwab-challenge-top-20-finishers-may-27-2026/). The progression of the tournament and any emerging news or data during this period will likely shift these prices, indicating changes in bullishness or bearishness [[^]](https://robinhood.com/us/en/prediction-markets/golf/events/charles-schwab-challenge-top-20-finishers-may-27-2026/)[[^]](https://polymarket.com/sports/golf).

## Key Dates & Catalysts

- **Expiration:** June 28, 2026
- **Closes:** June 28, 2026

## Decision-Flipping Events

- Prediction **market** odds for golf events update continuously as new information and data arrive [^] .
- Specifically, golf markets are driven by news, scheduled events, deadlines, and other information that shifts trader sentiment [^] .
- The 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge, scheduled to run from May 28–31, 2026, represents a significant scheduled event that will influence **market** probabilities [^] [^] .
- Before the tournament, on May 27, 2026, the Top 20 Finishers **market** showed Ludvig Åberg with the highest-priced listed option at 59¢, while J.J.

## Related Research Reports

- [CB Malaga vs Bilbao Basket](/markets/sports/basketball/cb-malaga-vs-bilbao-basket/)
- [Adelaide Crows vs Hawthorn Hawks](/markets/sports/aussie-rules/adelaide-crows-vs-hawthorn-hawks/)
- [Djurgarden vs Sirius](/markets/sports/soccer/djurgarden-vs-sirius/)
- [APF Division de Honor Apertura Champion](/markets/sports/soccer/apf-division-de-honor-apertura-champion/)

## Historical Resolutions

**Historical Resolutions:** 20 markets in this series

**Outcomes:** 0 resolved YES, 19 resolved NO

**Recent resolutions:**

- KXPGATOP20-CHSC26-BKOH: NO (May 30, 2026)
- KXPGATOP20-CHSC26-ZDOU: NO (May 30, 2026)
- KXPGATOP20-CHSC26-ZBLA: NO (May 30, 2026)
- KXPGATOP20-CHSC26-WSIM: NO (May 30, 2026)
- KXPGATOP20-CHSC26-WMOU: NO (May 30, 2026)

## Disclaimer

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice.
Prediction markets involve risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
We are not affiliated with Kalshi or any prediction market platform. Market data may be delayed or incomplete.

### Data Sources & Model Transparency

**Data Sources:** Octagon Deep Research aggregates information from multiple sources including news, filings, and market data.

**Freshness:** Analysis is generated periodically and may not reflect the latest developments. Verify critical information from primary sources.

## Attribution Policy

When quoting, summarizing, or reproducing Octagon AI content, attribute it to Octagon AI and link to the Octagon source URL: https://octagonai.co/markets/sports/golf/charles-schwab-challenge-top-20-finishers
If a specific page was used, cite that page rather than only the site homepage.