# Men's 2027 College Basketball Champion

2026-27 Season

Updated: April 14, 2026

Category: Sports

Tags: Basketball

HTML: /markets/sports/basketball/men-s-2027-college-basketball-champion/

## Short Answer

**Key takeaway.** Both the **model** and the **market** expect Duke to be the most likely Men's 2027 College Basketball Champion, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.

## Key Claims (January 2026)

**- - Duke secures top basketball recruiting classes for both 2025 and 2026.** - Kansas develops under-ranked talent into future NBA draftees effectively.
- Arizona coach Tommy Lloyd ensures program stability with contract through 2031.
- SEC projects as strongest conference in 2025-26 with many top-40 teams.
- Multiple SEC programs maintain top-tier NIL collectives for talent acquisition.

### Why This Matters (GEO)

- AI agents extract claims, not arguments.
- Improves citation probability in summaries and answer cards.
- Enables fact stitching across multiple sources.

## Executive Verdict

**Key takeaway.** **Model** and **market** align at **0.1%** **probability**, reflecting minimal specific evidence for Any Other Team.

### Who Wins and Why

| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Michigan | 16.0% | 8.3% | Market higher by 7.7pp |
| Duke | 11.0% | 9.6% | Duke holds the top composite recruiting class for 2025 and 2026, including multiple top-25 prospects. |
| UConn | 6.4% | 3.6% | Market higher by 2.8pp |

## Model vs Market

| Outcome | Market Probability | Octagon Model Probability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Michigan | 16.0% | 8.3% |
| Duke | 11.0% | 9.6% |
| UConn | 6.4% | 3.6% |
| Florida | 6.1% | 3.4% |
| North Carolina | 4.3% | 2.5% |
| Illinois | 7.0% | 3.9% |
| Louisville | 8.5% | 4.7% |
| Michigan St. | 5.7% | 3.2% |
| Kentucky | 5.0% | 2.9% |
| Arizona | 6.6% | 3.7% |
| Houston | 4.1% | 2.4% |
| Texas | 3.8% | 2.2% |
| Syracuse | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| UCLA | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Iowa | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| St. John's | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Tennessee | 1.3% | 0.8% |
| Arkansas | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| Alabama | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Purdue | 1.5% | 0.9% |
| Indiana | 1.4% | 0.9% |
| Providence | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| Texas Tech | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| Miami (FL) | 1.4% | 0.9% |
| Gonzaga | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| Virginia | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| Kansas | 4.0% | 2.3% |
| Texas A&M | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Clemson | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| Creighton | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Iowa St. | 2.5% | 1.4% |
| Ole Miss | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| BYU | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Wisconsin | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Florida St. | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Missouri | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Baylor | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Saint Mary's | 0.6% | 0.4% |
| SMU | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Boston College | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| USC | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| Xavier | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Notre Dame | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| San Diego St. | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Boise St. | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Vanderbilt | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Butler | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| St. Bonaventure | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ohio St. | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Oregon | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| San Francisco | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mississippi State | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Dayton | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Villanova | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Marquette | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Pittsburgh | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Georgetown | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Seton Hall | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Memphis | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Richmond | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| VCU | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Loyola Chicago | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Stanford | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Wake Forest | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Virginia Tech | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Cincinnati | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Colorado St. | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Nevada | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Oklahoma | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| North Carolina St. | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| Auburn | 0.8% | 0.5% |

- Expiration: April 27, 2027

## Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

This market exhibits a prolonged sideways trading pattern with extremely low implied probability, consistent with an event far in the future. The price has remained within a very narrow range of 0.0% to 1.0% since its inception. The most significant movement was an early, brief spike to 1.0% around April 9, 2026, which was quickly followed by a retreat to the current baseline of 0.1%. Since this initial volatility, the price has stabilized, suggesting a lack of significant news or events to influence trader sentiment. The cause for the initial price spike is not apparent from the available information.

The total trading volume of 464 contracts is relatively low, indicating limited market participation and conviction at this early stage. This low liquidity means that even small trades can cause noticeable price swings, which may explain the sharp, unsustained spike to 1.0%. This level has acted as a clear point of resistance that the market was unable to hold. The price floor appears to be established at 0.0%, with the market finding a general equilibrium around 0.1%. Overall, the price chart reflects a high degree of uncertainty, with the market assigning a very low, long-shot probability to this outcome, which is typical for a single team's championship odds several years in advance.

## Contract Snapshot

This market resolves to "Yes" if Michigan is the 2026-27 Division 1 Men's College Basketball National Champion, and "No" if they are not, as this is a mutually exclusive event. The market opened on April 6, 2026, and will close and expire early once the champion is declared, or by April 27, 2027, at 10:00 AM EDT. Payouts are projected to occur 5 minutes after closing.

## Market Discussion

Limited public discussion available for this market.

## Market Data

| Contract | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | Last Price | Volume | Open Interest |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Alabama | 2% | 2.7% | 2.7% | $2,271 | $2,250 |
| Arizona | 6.6% | 6.9% | 6.6% | $6,151 | $5,352 |
| Arkansas | 2.9% | 3.7% | 3.9% | $2,560 | $2,530 |
| Auburn | 0.8% | 2% | 0.8% | $176 | $176 |
| Baylor | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.9% | $608 | $608 |
| Boston College | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.4% | $557 | $547 |
| Boise St. | 0.1% | 1.2% | 0.1% | $466 | $465 |
| Butler | 0.1% | 2% | 0.1% | $464 | $464 |
| BYU | 0.4% | 2% | 2.7% | $650 | $650 |
| Cincinnati | 0.2% | 2% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| Clemson | 0.2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | $1,045 | $1,045 |
| UConn | 5.1% | 6.4% | 6.4% | $18,030 | $12,790 |
| Creighton | 0.1% | 1.7% | 1.7% | $794 | $794 |
| Colorado St. | 0.1% | 1.2% | 2% | $304 | $304 |
| Dayton | 0.1% | 1.2% | 1.2% | $459 | $459 |
| Duke | 11% | 14% | 11% | $63,845 | $36,373 |
| Florida | 6.1% | 7.2% | 6.1% | $10,696 | $7,938 |
| Florida St. | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.2% | $614 | $614 |
| Gonzaga | 2.4% | 3.8% | 3.6% | $1,478 | $1,443 |
| Georgetown | 0.1% | 1.6% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| Seton Hall | 0.1% | 1.8% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| Houston | 4.1% | 5.5% | 4.1% | $5,659 | $5,589 |
| Illinois | 5.6% | 6% | 7% | $9,717 | $9,319 |
| Indiana | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.4% | $1,933 | $1,815 |
| Iowa | 1.1% | 3.3% | 3.3% | $3,463 | $2,947 |
| Iowa St. | 2.1% | 2.7% | 2.5% | $761 | $751 |
| Kansas | 3.8% | 3.9% | 4% | $1,197 | $1,187 |
| Loyola Chicago | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2% | $304 | $304 |
| Louisville | 3% | 8.5% | 8.5% | $9,716 | $9,397 |
| Marquette | 0.2% | 1.6% | 0.1% | $314 | $314 |
| Memphis | 0.1% | 1.5% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| Miami (FL) | 0.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | $1,490 | $1,490 |
| Michigan | 14% | 16% | 16% | $195,244 | $100,988 |
| Ole Miss | 0.1% | 2% | 1.8% | $671 | $671 |
| Missouri | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.9% | $609 | $609 |
| Mississippi State | 0.1% | 2% | 0.1% | $464 | $464 |
| Michigan St. | 4.1% | 5.7% | 5.7% | $7,086 | $6,279 |
| North Carolina St. | 0.2% | 1.4% | 3.6% | $262 | $262 |
| Notre Dame | 0.2% | 1.7% | 0.1% | $470 | $470 |
| Nevada | 0.1% | 1.5% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| Oklahoma | 0.1% | 1.8% | 2% | $304 | $304 |
| Oregon | 0.2% | 1.7% | 0.1% | $464 | $464 |
| Ohio St. | 0.2% | 2% | 0.1% | $464 | $464 |
| Pittsburgh | 0.2% | 1.8% | 1.7% | $309 | $309 |
| Providence | 0.2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | $1,864 | $1,864 |
| Purdue | 1.5% | 2.7% | 1.5% | $2,054 | $1,985 |
| Richmond | 0.1% | 1.5% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| St. Bonaventure | 0.1% | 1.5% | 0.1% | $464 | $464 |
| San Diego St. | 0.1% | 2.2% | 0.1% | $470 | $470 |
| San Francisco | 0.1% | 1.6% | 0.1% | $464 | $464 |
| St. John's | 2.2% | 2.7% | 2.7% | $3,397 | $3,376 |
| Saint Mary's | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.6% | $604 | $594 |
| SMU | 0.2% | 1.7% | 0.1% | $563 | $563 |
| Stanford | 0.1% | 2.9% | 2% | $304 | $304 |
| Syracuse | 0.4% | 1.7% | 1.7% | $5,503 | $5,503 |
| Tennessee | 1.2% | 2.8% | 1.3% | $2,689 | $1,933 |
| Texas | 2.2% | 3.8% | 3.8% | $5,599 | $5,345 |
| Texas Tech | 2.3% | 3.6% | 3.6% | $1,500 | $1,496 |
| Texas A&M | 0.2% | 4.9% | 2.1% | $1,059 | $1,059 |
| UCLA | 0.5% | 1.9% | 1.9% | $4,254 | $3,430 |
| Kentucky | 3% | 5% | 5% | $6,895 | $6,619 |
| North Carolina | 3.1% | 4.3% | 4.3% | $9,850 | $8,153 |
| USC | 0.1% | 2.6% | 2.6% | $545 | $535 |
| Virginia | 2% | 2.7% | 2.6% | $1,453 | $1,453 |
| Vanderbilt | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.9% | $466 | $466 |
| VCU | 0.1% | 1.5% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| Villanova | 0.3% | 1.9% | 1.9% | $388 | $378 |
| Virginia Tech | 0.2% | 1.6% | 2% | $304 | $304 |
| Wake Forest | 0.1% | 1.6% | 0.1% | $304 | $304 |
| Wisconsin | 0.4% | 1.9% | 1.9% | $645 | $645 |
| Xavier | 0.2% | 1.7% | 1.7% | $519 | $519 |

## What Are Duke's Top-Ranked Basketball Recruiting Classes for 2025 and 2026?

2025 Recruiting Class Ranking | #1 (247Sports & On3 Composite) [[^]](https://247sports.com/season/2025-basketball/compositeteamrankings/) |
2026 Recruiting Class Ranking | #1 (247Sports & On3 Composite) [[^]](https://247sports.com/Season/2026-Basketball/CompositeTeamRankings/) |
2025 Top-25 National Commits | Cayden Boozer (No. 11), Meleek Thomas (No. 12) [[^]](https://www.on3.com/college/Duke-blue-devils/basketball/2025/commits/) |

**Duke leads in basketball recruiting for both 2025 and 2026 classes, being the sole program to secure a consensus top-10 recruiting class in both cycles and obtain commitments from at least one top-25 national prospect in each**

Duke leads in basketball recruiting for both 2025 and 2026 classes, being the sole program to secure a consensus top-10 recruiting class in both cycles and obtain commitments from at least one top-25 national prospect in each. For the 2025 recruiting class, Duke holds the top position in both the 247Sports and On3 composite team rankings [[^]](https://247sports.com/season/2025-basketball/compositeteamrankings/). Similarly, the program also ranks first according to both 247Sports and On3 for the 2026 class [[^]](https://247sports.com/Season/2026-Basketball/CompositeTeamRankings/).

Duke secured multiple top-25 national prospects for both cycles, demonstrating strong individual recruiting. For the 2025 class, the program has commitments from Cayden Boozer, ranked No. 11 nationally, and Meleek Thomas, ranked No. 12 nationally, with these rankings consistent across 247Sports and On3 composite assessments [[^]](https://www.on3.com/college/Duke-blue-devils/basketball/2025/commits/). For the 2026 class, Duke has also obtained commitments from highly-ranked prospects, including Ikenna Okwaralani, ranked No. 11 nationally, and Tyran Stokes, ranked No. 12 nationally, according to On3 reports [[^]](https://www.on3.com/college/Duke-blue-devils/basketball/2026/commits/).

Other programs have strong classes, but top-25 commitments remain unverified in this research. While institutions such as Arizona, Kansas, and North Carolina possess consensus top-10 classes for both the 2025 and 2026 cycles, specific top-25 national prospect commitments for these programs could not be verified with the information provided.

## Which College Coaches Meet Age and Contract Extension Criteria?

Tommy Lloyd (Arizona) | 49 years old; contract through 2031 [[^]](http://arizonawildcats.com/news/2026/4/3/mens-basketball-arizona-head-mens-basketball-coach-tommy-lloyd-agree-to-contract-extension-through-2031-season.aspx) |
T. J. Otzelberger (Iowa State) | 47 years old; contract through 2032 [[^]](https://cyclones.com/news/2024/12/17/mens-basketball-otzelberger-contract-extended-to-2032?path=general) |
Corey Gipson (Austin Peay) | 43 years old; contract through 2027-28 [[^]](https://letsgopeay.com/news/2024/7/10/mens-basketball-austin-peay-gipson-agree-on-contract-extension-through-2027-28.aspx) |

**Three head coaches meet the specific age and contract extension criteria**

Three head coaches meet the specific age and contract extension criteria. Tommy Lloyd of Arizona, born December 21, 1974, is 49 years old and has a contract extension through the 2031 season with the University of Arizona [[^]](http://arizonawildcats.com/news/2026/4/3/mens-basketball-arizona-head-mens-basketball-coach-tommy-lloyd-agree-to-contract-extension-through-2031-season.aspx). T. J. Otzelberger of Iowa State, born September 17, 1977, is 47 years old and holds a contract extended through 2032 with Iowa State University [[^]](https://cyclones.com/news/2024/12/17/mens-basketball-otzelberger-contract-extended-to-2032?path=general). Additionally, Corey Gipson of Austin Peay, born January 13, 1981, is 43 years old, with his contract extended through the 2027-28 season by Austin Peay State University [[^]](https://letsgopeay.com/news/2024/7/10/mens-basketball-austin-peay-gipson-agree-on-contract-extension-through-2027-28.aspx).

However, insufficient data prevents assessing transfer portal success fully. The provided research lacks comprehensive information to determine which of these coaches have successfully landed a top-50 ranked transfer portal player (per 247Sports) in each of the last two offseason cycles. Although sources [[^]](https://247sports.com/longformarticle/college-basketball-2024-transfer-portal-rankings-kansas-kentucky-unc-duke-kadary-richmond-oumar-ballo-johnell-davis-aj-storr-norchad-omier-tucker-devries-great-osobor-231301930/) and [[^]](https://247sports.com/longformarticle/final-ranking-for-the-top-150-players-in-the-college-basketball-transfer-portal-249119199/) list final rankings for 2024 transfer portal players, they do not specify player commitments to particular teams or coaches. Critically, the research contains no information or rankings pertaining to the 2023 transfer portal cycle, which is essential to satisfy the "each of the last two offseason cycles" condition [[^]](https://247sports.com/longformarticle/college-basketball-2024-transfer-portal-rankings-kansas-kentucky-unc-duke-kadary-richmond-oumar-ballo-johnell-davis-aj-storr-norchad-omier-tucker-devries-great-osobor-231301930/). Therefore, a complete answer identifying coaches who meet all specified criteria cannot be rendered at this time.

## What are the top university NIL collectives in 2024 rankings?

Ranking Source | On3's 2024 rankings [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/) |
Top Ranked Collective | Texas A&M (12th Man+ Foundation) [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/) |
Ranking Basis | Financial standing and ability to compensate athletes [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/) |

**On3's 2024 rankings identify universities with leading NIL collectives nationally**

On3's 2024 rankings identify universities with leading NIL collectives nationally. These rankings place Texas A&M's 12th Man+ Foundation at the top spot, followed by Tennessee's Spyre Sports Group, Oregon's Division Street, Georgia's Classic City Collective, Ohio State's THE Foundation, and Florida's Gator Guard, completing the top six nationally [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/). Additional prominent collectives in the top 15 include those associated with Penn State, Michigan, Oklahoma, Texas, LSU, Arkansas, USC, Miami, and Alabama [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/).

Financial strength in NIL collectives provides a critical competitive edge. These rankings reflect a sustainable financial advantage that aids universities in both acquiring and retaining future athletic talent [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/). The evaluation criteria for these rankings encompass a collective's funding, resources, and the number of athletes they engage with, directly indicating their capability to support student-athletes through NIL opportunities [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/). This robust financial infrastructure enables these universities to offer competitive NIL deals, which is a critical factor in attracting and retaining top-tier talent in collegiate sports, providing a significant edge in the evolving landscape of college athletics [[^]](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/on3s-top-15-nil-collectives-in-college-sports/).

## Which College Basketball Programs Excel at Developing Under-Ranked Talent?

Programs with 2+ Non-Top-75 Draftees | Kansas, Wake Forest, Colorado (2022-2024 drafts) [[^]](https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/2024-nba-draft-picks-by-college-team-school-uconn-leads-the-way-pac-12-well-represented-in-swan-song/) |
Kansas 2022 Draftees | Ochai Agbaji (ranked No. 136), Christian Braun (ranked No. 102) [[^]](https://www.midmajormadness.com/2022/6/24/23182346/2022-nba-draft-recap-7-former-mid-major-players-drafted-in-1st-round) |
Wake Forest 2022 Draftees | Jake LaRavia (ranked No. 258), Alondes Williams (unranked) [[^]](https://www.midmajormadness.com/2022/6/24/23182346/2022-nba-draft-recap-7-former-mid-major-players-drafted-in-1st-round) |

**Three college programs excel in developing overlooked high school talent for the NBA**

Three college programs excel in developing overlooked high school talent for the NBA. Kansas, Wake Forest, and Colorado have each produced at least two NBA draftees between 2022 and 2024 who were originally ranked outside the top-75 in their high school recruiting classes. In 2022, the University of Kansas saw Ochai Agbaji, ranked 136th in 2018, and Christian Braun, ranked 102nd in 2019, selected in the draft [[^]](https://www.midmajormadness.com/2022/6/24/23182346/2022-nba-draft-recap-7-former-mid-major-players-drafted-in-1st-round). Wake Forest similarly produced two draftees in 2022: Jake LaRavia, a 3-star recruit ranked 258th in 2019, and Alondes Williams, a JUCO transfer who was not ranked in his high school class [[^]](https://www.midmajormadness.com/2022/6/24/23182346/2022-nba-draft-recap-7-former-mid-major-players-drafted-in-1st-round). The University of Colorado also met this criterion with Jabari Walker, ranked 98th in 2020, drafted in 2022, and KJ Simpson, who was not listed in the top-75 for his recruiting class, drafted in 2024 [[^]](https://www.midmajormadness.com/2022/6/24/23182346/2022-nba-draft-recap-7-former-mid-major-players-drafted-in-1st-round).

Other programs also developed single unranked high school players for the NBA. Several other institutions had one player fitting these criteria across the 2022 and 2024 drafts. These included Purdue with Zach Edey, who was unranked in 2024; Tennessee with Dalton Knecht, who was not a top-75 recruit in 2024; and Wisconsin with Johnny Davis, ranked 153rd in 2022 [[^]](https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/2024-nba-draft-picks-recruiting-star-ratings-for-every-first-round-selection-who-attended-college/). It is important to note that the provided research did not contain sufficient high school recruiting class ranking data for players drafted in 2023 to evaluate them against the specified criteria.

## Which College Basketball Conference Is Strongest in 2025-26 Projections?

SEC Teams in Top 40 (2025-26) | 8 teams [[^]](https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/46861635/mens-college-basketball-2025-26-ranking-power-conferences) |
Big Ten Teams in Top 40 (2025-26) | 7 teams [[^]](https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/46861635/mens-college-basketball-2025-26-ranking-power-conferences) |
Big 12 Teams in Top 40 (2025-26) | 7 teams [[^]](https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/46861635/mens-college-basketball-2025-26-ranking-power-conferences) |

**The Southeastern Conference (SEC) projects strongest for the 2025-26 season**

The Southeastern Conference (SEC) projects strongest for the 2025-26 season. It is anticipated to lead all conferences with eight teams ranked within the preseason top 40 nationally. This places the SEC ahead of the Big Ten and Big 12, both projected to have seven teams in the top 40. The Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) is expected to follow with six teams in this elite group [[^]](https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/46861635/mens-college-basketball-2025-26-ranking-power-conferences).

ESPN projections highlight the detailed strength of each conference. The SEC is further distinguished by having six teams within the top 25 nationally, with two additional programs completing its total of eight teams in the top 40 [[^]](https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/46861635/mens-college-basketball-2025-26-ranking-power-conferences). The Big Ten is expected to feature five teams in the top 25 among its seven top-40 programs, while the Big 12 is projected to have four top-25 teams out of its seven. The ACC is anticipated to place four teams in the top 25 within its six total top-40 placements [[^]](https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/46861635/mens-college-basketball-2025-26-ranking-power-conferences).

This depth suggests the SEC will be the most competitive league. The high volume of highly-ranked opponents within the conference will provide its teams with a challenging schedule throughout regular season play [[^]](https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/46861635/mens-college-basketball-2025-26-ranking-power-conferences). This robust level of competition is expected to significantly prepare SEC teams for success in the 2027 NCAA Tournament and beyond, underscoring the conference's overall strength.

## What Could Change the Odds

**Key takeaway.** Catalyst analysis unavailable.

## Key Dates & Catalysts

- **Expiration:** April 27, 2027
- **Closes:** April 27, 2027

## Decision-Flipping Events

- Catalyst analysis unavailable.

## Related Research Reports

- [CB Malaga vs Bilbao Basket](/markets/sports/basketball/cb-malaga-vs-bilbao-basket/)
- [Olimpia vs Luqueno](/markets/sports/soccer/olimpia-vs-luqueno/)
- [Trinidense vs CD Recoleta](/markets/sports/soccer/trinidense-vs-cd-recoleta/)
- [Feldbausch vs Kingsley](/markets/sports/tennis/feldbausch-vs-kingsley/)

## Historical Resolutions

**Historical Resolutions:** 20 markets in this series

**Outcomes:** 0 resolved YES, 20 resolved NO

**Recent resolutions:**

- KXMARMAD-26-UGA: NO (Mar 20, 2026)
- KXMARMAD-26-TCU: NO (Mar 21, 2026)
- KXMARMAD-26-USU: NO (Mar 23, 2026)
- KXMARMAD-26-CBU: NO (Mar 21, 2026)
- KXMARMAD-26-KENN: NO (Mar 20, 2026)

## Disclaimer

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice.
Prediction markets involve risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
We are not affiliated with Kalshi or any prediction market platform. Market data may be delayed or incomplete.

### Data Sources & Model Transparency

**Data Sources:** Octagon Deep Research aggregates information from multiple sources including news, filings, and market data.

**Freshness:** Analysis is generated periodically and may not reflect the latest developments. Verify critical information from primary sources.