# Which G7 leader will leave next?

G7 Leaders

Updated: April 5, 2026

Category: Politics

Tags: International

HTML: /markets/politics/international/which-g7-leader-will-leave-next/

## Short Answer

**Key takeaway.** Both the **model** and the **market** expect Keir Starmer to be the next G7 leader to leave, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.

## Key Claims (January 2026)

**- - Meloni's coalition faces fragility after a significant referendum defeat.** - Italy's government stability threatened by internal divisions and fiscal challenges.
- Kishida faces a scheduled LDP presidential election in September 2024.
- Starmer faced significant internal party rebellion over welfare reform.
- Macron faces a cohabitation crisis, diminishing his parliamentary power.

### Why This Matters (GEO)

- AI agents extract claims, not arguments.
- Improves citation probability in summaries and answer cards.
- Enables fact stitching across multiple sources.

## Executive Verdict

**Key takeaway.** **Model**'s **2.4%** for Meloni's fragile coalition vs 2c **market** (50x payout) implies a +0.4 gap.

### Who Wins and Why

| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Keir Starmer | 59.0% | 54.6% | Internal party rebellion over welfare reform in July 2025 led to calls for Starmer's resignation. |
| Sanae Takaichi | 1.0% | 1.2% | Model higher by 0.2pp |
| Donald Trump | 4.0% | 4.8% | Model higher by 0.8pp |

## Model vs Market

| Outcome | Market Probability | Octagon Model Probability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Keir Starmer | 59.0% | 54.6% |
| Sanae Takaichi | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Donald Trump | 4.0% | 4.8% |
| Emmanuel Macron | 26.0% | 23.5% |
| Mark Carney | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| Giorgia Meloni | 7.0% | 11.1% |
| Friedrich Merz | 2.0% | 2.4% |

- Expiration: January 1, 2045

## Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

This market contract has demonstrated a sideways trading pattern within a narrow and low-probability range. The price has fluctuated between a low of 1.0% and a high of 6.0% since trading began. Starting at 1.0%, the price experienced an early spike to 3.0% around March 26th before settling back down to its current level of 2.0%. The overall price action suggests a lack of a clear, sustained trend in either direction, with the market's perceived probability for this outcome remaining consistently low throughout its history.

The most notable price movement, the jump to 3.0% on March 26th, cannot be attributed to a specific external event due to the lack of provided context. However, this price increase was accompanied by a significant volume surge, representing a substantial portion of the total 231 contracts traded. This pattern suggests the move was driven by a brief period of focused trading activity, though it was not sustained. The 1.0% price level appears to act as support, with 6.0% forming a resistance ceiling. Overall, the low volume and tight trading range indicate that market sentiment is stable and reflects a very low perceived probability of this outcome, with traders seemingly awaiting a significant political catalyst to establish a more definitive trend.

## Contract Snapshot

This market resolves to Yes if Keir Starmer, holding the title of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom at market issuance, is the first G7 leader among the set to actually leave office; otherwise, it resolves to No. The market opened on October 23, 2025, and closes either when a leader leaves or by January 1, 2045, with payouts 30 minutes later. If a leader dies in office, all markets in the set settle at their last traded prices before death, with the Exchange determining fair value if prices are not logically consistent.

## Market Discussion

Limited public discussion available for this market.

## Market Data

| Contract | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | Last Price | Volume | Open Interest |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Donald Trump | 1% | 4% | 4% | $4,181 | $2,294 |
| Emmanuel Macron | 25% | 32% | 26% | $3,488 | $2,205 |
| Friedrich Merz | 0% | 4% | 2% | $2,586 | $2,464 |
| Giorgia Meloni | 2% | 7% | 7% | $2,586 | $1,600 |
| Keir Starmer | 57% | 59% | 59% | $12,313 | $6,843 |
| Mark Carney | 0% | 2% | 2% | $2,673 | $1,955 |
| Sanae Takaichi | 0% | 5% | 1% | $5,271 | $2,123 |

## What Challenges Threaten Giorgia Meloni's Coalition Stability?

Referendum defeat | March 2026 [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/italys-meloni-faces-risky-choices-after-referendum-defeat-shakes-government-2026-03-24/) |
Critical fiscal challenge | 2026 fiscal crossroads [[^]](https://www.ainvest.com/news/meloni-fragile-coalition-vannacci-exit-2026-fiscal-crossroads-2602/) |
Lega's military spending stance | "Niet" to increased military spending [[^]](https://www.dagospia.com/politica/salvini-dis-arma-meloni-il-niet-lega-sull-aumento-delle-spese-militari-459824) |

**Giorgia Meloni's coalition faces increased fragility after a recent referendum defeat**

Giorgia Meloni's coalition faces increased fragility after a recent referendum defeat. The Prime Minister is considering "risky choices" following a significant March 2026 referendum defeat [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/italys-meloni-faces-risky-choices-after-referendum-defeat-shakes-government-2026-03-24/), which prompted a "restart" summit with Antonio Tajani of Forza Italia and Matteo Salvini of Lega [[^]](http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/governo/meloni-tajani-e-salvini-vertice-ripartenza-casa-premier-2644614.html). A critical challenge for the government is the upcoming 2026 fiscal crossroads, identified as a key point of potential instability [[^]](https://www.ainvest.com/news/meloni-fragile-coalition-vannacci-exit-2026-fiscal-crossroads-2602/). The government has also faced a budget setback, reportedly breaking EU rules and negatively impacting GDP forecasts, further complicating future financial decisions [[^]](https://www.svd.se/a/433ad9/budgetbakslag-for-meloni-bryter-mot-eu-regler).

Matteo Salvini's Lega party is experiencing significant internal divisions and leadership challenges. The party is described by some as "ripping apart," with tensions intensified by General Roberto Vannacci's strong electoral performance, which directly challenges Salvini's leadership and coalition stability [[^]](https://www.ainvest.com/news/meloni-fragile-coalition-vannacci-exit-2026-fiscal-crossroads-2602/). Salvini has publicly addressed these rifts, asserting the party's unity by stating, "The League is a family and a community, we're not a barracks" [[^]](https://www.agenzianova.com/en/news/Salvini--the-League-is-a-family-and-a-community--we-are-not-a-barracks./). On policy, Lega opposes increasing military spending, advocating for these funds to be redirected elsewhere, highlighting a key disagreement within the alliance [[^]](https://www.dagospia.com/politica/salvini-dis-arma-meloni-il-niet-lega-sull-aumento-delle-spese-militari-459824).

Forza Italia focuses on party renewal and strategic positioning after the referendum. Under Antonio Tajani, the party held a summit for revitalization discussions after the referendum defeat [[^]](https://www.iltempo.it/politica/2026/04/02/news/forza-italia-crisi-post-referendum-strategie-marina-berlusconi-antoni-tajani-vertice-leader-47105699/). Tajani publicly affirmed the party's democratic commitment, stating Forza Italia "bow[s] to the will of the people" regarding the referendum outcome [[^]](https://www.ansa.it/english/news/politics/2026/03/23/tajani-says-we-bow-to-the-will-of-the-people-we-did-everything-possible_09813978-42b1-4e03-aa79-25da39f643b9.html). Both Lega and Forza Italia are carefully positioning themselves in response to recent electoral results and ongoing policy debates, particularly concerning the upcoming 2026 budget and EU directives [[^]](https://www.ainvest.com/news/meloni-fragile-coalition-vannacci-exit-2026-fiscal-crossroads-2602/).

## Will National Rally Secure Absolute Majority in French Elections?

RN Ifop-Fiducial Projection | 220-250 seats [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2024_French_legislative_election) |
RN Harris Interactive Projection | 235-265 seats [[^]](https://www.boursier.com/actualites/reuters/legislatives-le-rn-remporterait-235-a-265-sieges-a-l-assemblee-sondage-toluna-harris-interactive-368043.html) |
Absolute Majority Threshold | 289 seats [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-far-right-rn-party-would-not-get-majority-parliament-harris-interactive-2024-07-03/) |

**National Rally seat projections fall short of an absolute majority**

National Rally seat projections fall short of an absolute majority.
The National Rally (RN) is widely projected to fall short of securing an absolute majority in the French legislative elections, which requires 289 seats. Forecasts from Ifop-Fiducial estimate the RN winning between 220 and 250 seats [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2024_French_legislative_election), while Harris Interactive projects a range of 235 to 265 seats [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-far-right-rn-party-would-not-get-majority-parliament-harris-interactive-2024-07-03/). These projections place the party below the threshold required to govern independently [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-far-right-rn-party-would-not-get-majority-parliament-harris-interactive-2024-07-03/).

Cohabitation with President Macron appears highly probable.
A "cohabitation" crisis, where the President and the parliamentary majority belong to opposing political parties, is therefore highly likely for Emmanuel Macron. Although a precise numerical **probability** for cohabitation is not available, current models strongly indicate that the National Rally will not achieve the necessary seats for an absolute majority [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-far-right-rn-party-would-not-get-majority-parliament-harris-interactive-2024-07-03/). This scenario would compel the formation of a government by a rival political bloc, thereby leading to a cohabitation period [[^]](https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/fr-politics-2025-crisis.htm).

## What was Donald Trump's New York conviction outcome and presidential incarceration remedies?

Trump's NY Conviction Outcome | Unconditional discharge issued on January 10, 2025 [[^]](https://www.npr.org/2025/01/10/nx-s1-5253927/trump-sentencing-new-york) |
Presidential Inability Process | 25th Amendment [[^]](https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2023/04/stronga-convict-in-chief-strong/) |
Presidential Misconduct Process | Impeachment under Article II, Section 4 [[^]](https://texaslawreview.org/prosecuting-and-punishing-our-presidents/) |

**Donald Trump's New York conviction concluded without incarceration**

Donald Trump's New York conviction concluded without incarceration. The sentencing occurred on January 10, 2025 [[^]](https://www.npr.org/2025/01/10/nx-s1-5253927/trump-sentencing-new-york), after the Supreme Court allowed it to proceed [[^]](https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-allows-trumps-new-york-criminal-sentencing-to-go-forward/). The court issued an unconditional discharge, a penalty-free sentence that does not involve incarceration, probation, or fines for this specific felony case [[^]](https://www.npr.org/2025/01/10/nx-s1-5253927/trump-sentencing-new-york). Therefore, the immediate concern of a sitting president facing incarceration for this conviction has been addressed by the imposed sentence [[^]](https://www.npr.org/2025/01/10/nx-s1-5253927/trump-sentencing-new-york).

The 25th Amendment addresses presidential inability to serve. Should a sitting president face potential incarceration in future hypothetical scenarios, the U.S. Constitution offers specific mechanisms for congressional action. The 25th Amendment outlines procedures for presidential disability or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the office [[^]](https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2023/04/stronga-convict-in-chief-strong/). Under Section 4, the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet (or another body designated by law) can declare the President unable to perform their duties, at which point the Vice President immediately assumes the powers and duties as Acting President [[^]](https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2023/04/stronga-convict-in-chief-strong/). If the President disputes this declaration, Congress must decide the issue, requiring a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to remove the President [[^]](https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2023/04/stronga-convict-in-chief-strong/).

Impeachment provides another constitutional pathway for removal. Additionally, Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution allows for the impeachment of a President for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" [[^]](https://texaslawreview.org/prosecuting-and-punishing-our-presidents/). This process involves a majority vote in the House to impeach and a two-thirds conviction vote in the Senate, which could ultimately lead to removal from office [[^]](https://texaslawreview.org/prosecuting-and-punishing-our-presidents/).

## What Challenges Has Keir Starmer's Leadership Faced So Far?

Leadership Honeymoon Period | Short or non-existent [[^]](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2l8ge86z7o) |
Key Policy Rebellion Area | Welfare reform [[^]](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99n798ye1zo) |
Outcome of Leadership Challenges | Backed by ministers, withstood challenges [[^]](https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/07/02/zfxb-j02.html) |

**Keir Starmer's leadership experienced an immediate and significant internal challenge**

Keir Starmer's leadership experienced an immediate and significant internal challenge. His tenure has been characterized by a notably brief or absent "honeymoon" period, as he faced immediate pressures such as tax warnings, riots, and general unrest from the outset [[^]](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2l8ge86z7o). A substantial internal disagreement emerged concerning welfare reform, culminating in a "benefits rebellion" within the Labour Party in July 2025 [[^]](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c99n798ye1zo). This specific policy area generated considerable opposition, with numerous Labour MPs voting against or supporting amendments that diverged from Starmer's proposed stance [[^]](https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/07/02/zfxb-j02.html).

Welfare reform triggered substantial disagreement, but Starmer's resilience prevented his unseating. Although the dissent on welfare reform was notable, the bill ultimately passed, demonstrating that while the rebellion was significant, it did not stop the legislation from being enacted [[^]](https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/07/02/zfxb-j02.html). Later, around February 2026, Starmer confronted more direct challenges to his leadership, including calls for his resignation from within the party [[^]](https://news.smh.com.au/world/europe/starmer-backed-by-ministers-after-rebels-go-public-to-tear-down-prime-minister-20260210-p5o0vn.html). However, he received support from his ministers and successfully navigated this turbulent period, showcasing his capacity to maintain essential backing and withstand attempts to remove him from power [[^]](https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/07/02/zfxb-j02.html). This pattern suggests Starmer has, thus far, proven robust in the face of internal pressures, though the risk of future challenges persists.

## What Catalysts Could Spark a Leadership Change for PM Kishida?

LDP Presidential Election | September 2024 [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Liberal_Democratic_Party_presidential_election) |
LDP Support Recovery | 43% by February 2026 [[^]](https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/politics/politics-government/20260220-312533/) |
Early Leadership Challenge Deadline | No explicit procedural deadline ahead of September 2024 [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Liberal_Democratic_Party_presidential_election) |

**The most immediate catalyst for a leadership change is the September 2024 LDP presidential election [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Liberal_Democratic_Party_presidential_election)**

The most immediate catalyst for a leadership change is the September 2024 LDP presidential election [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Liberal_Democratic_Party_presidential_election). While the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) support recovered to **43%** by February 2026, bouncing back from previous lows experienced under Prime Minister Fumio Kishida [[^]](https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/politics/politics-government/20260220-312533/), and retained a high approval rating post-election in early 2026 [[^]](https://beta.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/02/16/japan/politics/ldp-approval-rating/), a significant decline in his personal approval ratings could prompt internal party factions to field strong challengers during the upcoming election campaign.

No specific deadline for challenging Kishida ahead of the election is detailed. The provided sources do not explicitly detail a specific procedural deadline for factions to formally trigger a leadership challenge ahead of the scheduled September 2024 LDP presidential election [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Liberal_Democratic_Party_presidential_election). Such challenges typically involve gathering a requisite number of LDP Diet members to formally nominate a candidate during the official election period.

## What Could Change the Odds

**Key takeaway.** Catalyst analysis unavailable.

## Key Dates & Catalysts

- **Expiration:** January 01, 2045
- **Closes:** January 01, 2045

## Decision-Flipping Events

- Catalyst analysis unavailable.

## Related Research Reports

- [Which of these African leaders will leave office next?](/markets/politics/international/which-of-these-african-leaders-will-leave-office-next/)
- [Will Trump balance the budget?](/markets/politics/trump/will-trump-balance-the-budget/)
- [When will Pam Bondi depart as Attorney General?](/markets/politics/when-will-pam-bondi-depart-as-attorney-general/)
- [Who will leave Trump's Cabinet next?](/markets/politics/trump/who-will-leave-trump-s-cabinet-next/)

## Historical Resolutions

No historical resolution data available for this series.

## Disclaimer

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice.
Prediction markets involve risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
We are not affiliated with Kalshi or any prediction market platform. Market data may be delayed or incomplete.

### Data Sources & Model Transparency

**Data Sources:** Octagon Deep Research aggregates information from multiple sources including news, filings, and market data.

**Freshness:** Analysis is generated periodically and may not reflect the latest developments. Verify critical information from primary sources.