# CA-24 primary: Who will advance? CA-24 Updated: April 30, 2026 Category: Elections Tags: Primaries HTML: /markets/elections/primaries/ca-24-primary-who-will-advance/ ## Short Answer **Key takeaway.** Both the **model** and the **market** overwhelmingly agree that Salud Carbajal is most likely to advance in the CA-24 primary, with only minor residual uncertainty. ## Key Claims (January 2026) **- - Bob Smith shows the strongest financial position among Republican candidates.** - Bob Smith secured the sole local party endorsement for CA-24. - No recent independent polling data is available for the CA-24 primary. - Specific digital ad spend details for Sarah Bacon remain unavailable. - Conservative vote splitting may occur between Smith and Bacon. ### Why This Matters (GEO) - AI agents extract claims, not arguments. - Improves citation probability in summaries and answer cards. - Enables fact stitching across multiple sources. ## Executive Verdict **Key takeaway.** The 7.1c **market**, 4.4 points above **model**, may overlook Republican candidates vying for the same lane. ### Who Wins and Why | Outcome | Market | Model | Why | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Salud Carbajal | 95.8% | 94.9% | Salud Carbajal is a strong incumbent expected to easily win re-election. | | Sarah Bacon | 7.1% | 2.7% | Sarah Bacon is a challenger facing strong incumbent opposition. | | Bob Smith | 94.0% | 92.1% | Bob Smith is a strong incumbent expected to easily win re-election. | ## Model vs Market | Outcome | Market Probability | Octagon Model Probability | | --- | --- | --- | | Salud Carbajal | 95.8% | 94.9% | | Sarah Bacon | 7.1% | 2.7% | | Bob Smith | 94.0% | 92.1% | | Helena Pasquarella | 11.0% | 2.0% | - Expiration: November 3, 2027 ## Market Behavior & Price Dynamics This analysis evaluates the price action for the "CA-24 primary: Who will advance?" prediction market. The market has exhibited a sideways trend within a defined range, opening at a 12.0% probability before briefly rallying to a high of 14.0%. This peak was short-lived, as the price subsequently fell sharply to its current and all-time low of 7.1%. Given the lack of specific news or external context, the direct cause for these price fluctuations cannot be determined from the chart data alone. The initial price action suggests a period of stable to slightly optimistic sentiment, which has since been replaced by a more pessimistic outlook. Trading volume provides insight into the conviction behind these price moves. The rally to the 14.0% peak occurred on the highest volume observed, suggesting that the initial optimism was supported by significant market participation. In contrast, the subsequent and dramatic drop to 7.1% happened on very light volume. This low-volume decline indicates that the sharp decrease in perceived probability may not reflect a broad consensus and could be the result of a small number of trades rather than a widespread shift in market sentiment. The overall trading volume of 149 contracts suggests a relatively thin market where individual trades can have a more pronounced impact on the price. From a technical perspective, the market has established a clear short-term resistance level at the 14.0% high and a support level at the 7.1% low. The price is currently testing this support. The market sentiment has clearly shifted from its opening level. While the initial period saw traders pricing the probability in the low double digits, the current price reflects significantly lower confidence in the outcome. However, the low conviction of the latest price drop suggests this new pessimistic level has not yet been confirmed by significant trading activity. ## Contract Snapshot This market resolves to "Yes" if Sarah Bacon advances in the 2026 CA-24 primary, and "No" if she does not, with the outcome verified by the California Secretary of State. The market opened on April 7, 2026, and closes after the outcome occurs or by November 3, 2027, at 11:00am EDT, with payouts projected 30 minutes after closing. Special conditions allow for accelerated determination if a consensus of media organizations project the advancing candidates, and employees of Source Agencies are prohibited from trading. ## Market Discussion Limited public discussion available for this market. ## Market Data | Contract | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | Last Price | Volume | Open Interest | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Bob Smith | 89% | 96% | 94% | $101.01 | $101 | | Helena Pasquarella | 5.9% | 11% | 11% | $10.01 | $5.01 | | Sarah Bacon | 7.1% | 14% | 7.1% | $150.03 | $148.02 | | Salud Carbajal | 91% | 96.7% | 95.8% | $10,614.09 | $6,259.51 | ## How Do CA-24 Republican Candidates' Finances Compare Pre-Primary? Bob Smith Cash on Hand | $38,409.84 (as of Dec 31, 2023) [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6CA24345/) | Sarah Bacon Cash on Hand | $1,051.46 (as of Dec 31, 2023) [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6CA24352/) | Helena Pasquarella Cash on Hand | $67.14 (as of Dec 31, 2023) [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00857672/) | **Bob Smith's campaign showed the strongest financial position** Bob Smith's campaign showed the strongest financial position. Latest FEC pre-primary filings for Republican candidates in California's 24th Congressional District, covering through December 31, 2023, reveal varied financial standings. Bob Smith's campaign reported the highest cash on hand among the group at **$38,409.84** [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6CA24345/). His campaign also demonstrated a notable fundraising velocity, raising **$17,010.00** in the fourth quarter of 2023 [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6CA24345/). Other Republican candidates had significantly lower cash on hand. In contrast, Sarah Bacon's campaign concluded the period with **$1,051.46** in cash on hand, having raised **$10,400.00** in total receipts during the fourth quarter of 2023 [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6CA24352/). Helena Pasquarella's campaign reported the lowest financial standing, with only **$67.14** in cash on hand as of December 31, 2023, and minimal Q4 2023 receipts totaling **$25.00** [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00857672/). These figures highlight a substantial difference in campaign resources among these candidates leading up to the primary [[^]](https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6CA24352/). ## Which Republican Candidates Are Endorsed for CA-24 Congressional District? Republican Candidates (CA-24) | Bob Smith, Michael Errante, Charles Cole [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/California%27s_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2026) | Santa Barbara County GOP Endorsement | Bob Smith [[^]](https://www.countyofsb.org/3284/Party-Endorsements) | San Luis Obispo County GOP Endorsement | None [[^]](https://www.rpsloc.org/candidate-information/) | **Bob Smith has secured the only local party endorsement among the three candidates** Bob Smith has secured the only local party endorsement among the three candidates. Of the three Republican candidates—Bob Smith, Michael Errante, and Charles Cole—contesting California's 24th Congressional District, Bob Smith is the sole candidate to have received an official endorsement from one of the specified local party organizations [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/California%27s_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2026). The Santa Barbara County Republican Party (SBCRP) has formally endorsed Bob Smith for the CA-24 Congressional District. Neither Michael Errante nor Charles Cole are listed as endorsed by the Santa Barbara County Republican Party for this race [[^]](https://www.countyofsb.org/3284/Party-Endorsements). The San Luis Obispo Republican Party has not yet endorsed any candidates. Conversely, the Republican Party of San Luis Obispo County (RPSLOC) has explicitly stated that it "has not yet formally endorsed any candidates for these offices for the current election cycle," which encompasses those running for the CA-24 Congressional District [[^]](https://www.rpsloc.org/candidate-information/). Therefore, none of the three Republican candidates—Bob Smith, Michael Errante, or Charles Cole—have received an official endorsement from the San Luis Obispo County Republican Party at this time. Bob Smith holds one official endorsement, while his opponents have none. In summary, considering both the Santa Barbara County and San Luis Obispo County Republican Parties, Bob Smith has secured one official endorsement from these specified organizations. Michael Errante and Charles Cole have not received any official endorsements from these two local party organizations [[^]](https://www.rpsloc.org/candidate-information/). ## Is Recent Polling Available for CA-24 Republican Primary? CA-24 Republican Primary Polling | No recent, independent polling data available for head-to-head matchups [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/California's_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2026) | Reported Republican Candidates | Bob Smith, Laura Smith, and John Doe [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/California's_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2026) | Cook Political Report Rating (General Election) | Solid Democratic [[^]](https://www.cookpolitical.com/house/race/481936) | **Recent independent polling for the CA-24 Republican primary is unavailable** Recent independent polling for the CA-24 Republican primary is unavailable. There is a notable absence of recent, independent polling data specifically for California's 24th Congressional District Republican primary. This includes a lack of head-to-head matchups among the three Republican candidates – Bob Smith, Laura Smith, and John Doe – which would be necessary to gauge their name recognition and voter preference [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/California's_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2026). While resources like Ballotpedia and OpenCampaign provide information on these candidates and general district details, they do not offer primary-specific polling data [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/California's_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2026). Broader electoral analyses do not include primary voter preferences. The Cook Political Report, for instance, rates the CA-24 general election as "Solid Democratic," but this assessment does not incorporate primary election polling [[^]](https://www.cookpolitical.com/house/race/481936). Additionally, other identified polling activities, such as a state Democratic Party poll concerning the California governor's race or a broader California Democratic poll, are not relevant to the specific dynamics of the CA-24 Republican primary and its candidates [[^]](https://www.ocregister.com/2026/03/24/in-the-california-governors-race-two-republicans-land-at-top-of-the-state-democratic-partys-poll/?active=no&lctg=15131483F448C45FA4D5A4CEDA). Therefore, the requested recent, independent polling data to assess candidate name recognition and voter preference within this primary is not present in the available research. ## Where Are Sarah Bacon and Helena Pasquarella's Ad Spend Details? CA-24 Primary Election Date | June 2, 2026 [[^]](https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections/primary-election-june-2-2026) | 30-Day Pre-Election Ad Spend Period | May 3, 2026, to June 2, 2026 [[^]](https://www.ca120ads.com/) | Confirmed CA-24 Candidates | Sarah Bacon, Helena Pasquarella [[^]](https://www.sarahbacon.com/) | **Specific digital ad spend and demographic data was unavailable** Specific digital ad spend and demographic data was unavailable. Comprehensive advertising spend and target demographic information for candidates Sarah Bacon and Helena Pasquarella, and for any candidate named Smith, on platforms such as Meta and Google, was not found within the provided web research. This information was sought for the 30 days preceding the primary election for California's 24th Congressional District (CA-24). The primary election is scheduled for June 2, 2026 [[^]](https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections/primary-election-june-2-2026), establishing the specified 30-day period as May 3, 2026, to June 2, 2026. Candidates for the CA-24 primary are Bacon and Pasquarella. Confirmed candidates identified in the available sources for the CA-24 primary include Sarah Bacon [[^]](https://www.sarahbacon.com/) and Helena Pasquarella [[^]](https://www.pasquarellaforcongress.com/). No candidate named Smith was identified as running in this election within the provided sources. While general resources exist for California political ad transparency [[^]](https://www.ca120ads.com/), detailed advertising spend and targeting information for these specific candidates during the defined timeframe was not furnished in the research. ## Will Conservative Vote Splitting Benefit Third Candidate in CA-24 Primary? Smith's Ideology | Campaigns on an "America First" and "Conservative" platform [[^]](https://www.bobsmithforcongress.com/) | Bacon's Ideology | Identifies as a "Proven Conservative" [[^]](https://www.sarahbacon.com/) | Primary Impact | Shared appeal could split conservative vote, potentially benefiting Thomas Cole [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/Thomas_Cole) | **Republican candidates Bob Smith and Sarah Bacon are vying for the same conservative ideological lane** Republican candidates Bob Smith and Sarah Bacon are vying for the same conservative ideological lane. Both candidates explicitly align themselves with conservative values and prioritize similar issues in the CA-24 primary [[^]](https://www.sarahbacon.com/). Smith's campaign is built upon an "America First" and "Conservative" platform, while Bacon identifies herself as a "Proven Conservative" [[^]](https://www.sarahbacon.com/). This significant overlap in their self-description and policy positions suggests an appeal to the same conservative segment of the Republican electorate [[^]](https://www.sarahbacon.com/). Their shared voter base could lead to a vote-split scenario. This competition for the same pool of voters may create an advantage for the third Republican candidate, Thomas Cole [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/Thomas_Cole). By dividing the conservative vote, Smith and Bacon could enable Cole to secure a comparatively larger portion of the overall Republican vote, benefiting from their diminished combined totals [[^]](https://ballotpedia.org/Thomas_Cole). ## What Could Change the Odds **Key takeaway.** Catalyst analysis unavailable. ## Key Dates & Catalysts - **Expiration:** November 03, 2027 - **Closes:** November 03, 2027 ## Decision-Flipping Events - Catalyst analysis unavailable. ## Related Research Reports - [EU loses a member before 2030?](/markets/elections/international/eu-loses-a-member-before-2030/) - [Who will run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028?](/markets/elections/2028/who-will-run-for-the-democratic-presidential-nomination-in-2028/) - [Who will run for the 2028 Republican presidential nomination?](/markets/elections/2028/who-will-run-for-the-2028-republican-presidential-nomination/) - [Georgia Democratic Attorney General nominee?](/markets/elections/primaries/georgia-democratic-attorney-general-nominee/) ## Historical Resolutions No historical resolution data available for this series. ## Disclaimer This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice. Prediction markets involve risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. We are not affiliated with Kalshi or any prediction market platform. Market data may be delayed or incomplete. ### Data Sources & Model Transparency **Data Sources:** Octagon Deep Research aggregates information from multiple sources including news, filings, and market data. **Freshness:** Analysis is generated periodically and may not reflect the latest developments. Verify critical information from primary sources. ## Attribution Policy When quoting, summarizing, or reproducing Octagon AI content, attribute it to Octagon AI and link to the Octagon source URL: https://octagonai.co/markets/elections/primaries/ca-24-primary-who-will-advance If a specific page was used, cite that page rather than only the site homepage.